[問題] 請幫我看看是否有更好的翻譯方法?

看板translator作者 (秋天.Rome)時間17年前 (2007/03/25 16:05), 編輯推噓4(402)
留言6則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
英翻中 原文如下 : It is impossible define an exact moment when anthropology begins, but anthropological ideas emerged long before the establishment of the discipline. Crucial to the understanding of what was to come were notions of natural law and the social contract, as formulated in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.Though these ideas have long since been jettisoned by most social scientists,they marks a baseline for debate about the nature of society. Eighteenth-century anthropological concerns included feral children, the "Orang Outang",and notions of "savege life". Ethnography as we know it did not then exist. Montesquieu and Rousseau are both today claimed as founders of social science, and the sociological tradition descended from the former has parallels with the anthropological one. One view of the founding of anthropology is that it stems from the debate between the polygenists and the monogenists of the early nineteenth century. All anthropology today inherits the monogenist premise that humankind is one species. --> 今天,所有的人類學家都承襲了人類同源論的假設,即人類是ㄧ個物種。 就是最後一句話翻得很奇怪 請各位幫忙 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.226.47

03/25 19:56, , 1F
所有人類學家都承襲 一源論「人類是單ㄧ物種」的大前題
03/25 19:56, 1F

03/26 01:08, , 2F
今日所有的人類學家,皆承襲人類同源論的假設,
03/26 01:08, 2F

03/26 01:13, , 3F
也就是認為人類是單一物種
03/26 01:13, 3F

03/26 01:14, , 4F
其實把標點符號位置調整一下就很好啦
03/26 01:14, 4F

03/26 19:21, , 5F
推二樓
03/26 19:21, 5F

03/27 20:21, , 6F
人類學家不是anthropologist?
03/27 20:21, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #161Yrdw0 (translator)