Re: [討論] 快40歲大叔的性慾討論
很認真的看完整串討論文
原本真的以為有這種困擾的只有少數人
沒想到有一樣困擾的朋友,居然這麼多
我32,結婚快四年,兩個小孩(雙胞胎)
四年來,跟老婆恩愛次數...... 2次...
原因不外乎跟大多數一樣,
老婆帶了整天小孩,沒性趣
有自己的時間,當然要快追劇,也沒時間理我
我自己的處理方式,也就是等他們睡了
躲在廁所打手槍...
所以我的手機裡A片也是一大堆
有時候也會回味以前,
還沒結婚前老婆傳的性感照來懷念
(不用跟我伸圖,這私人典藏)
也曾想過找個茶魚來鬆一下
不過都因故沒成行就是了
偷偷意淫同事、客戶,目前就很滿足了
是說,真的很想問一下
這些已經"性冷感"的你(妳),
對另一半,是比較能接受
1.精神出軌,但不偷吃的
2.肉體出軌,但堅持精神不外遇?
如果都無法接受的,有啥其他建議?
總不能自己冷感...還要另一半陪你(妳)守活寡吧!?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.218.97.121
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/sex/M.1474036715.A.A89.html
推
09/16 22:39, , 1F
09/16 22:39, 1F
推
09/16 22:40, , 2F
09/16 22:40, 2F
→
09/16 22:40, , 3F
09/16 22:40, 3F
→
09/16 22:42, , 4F
09/16 22:42, 4F
→
09/16 22:42, , 5F
09/16 22:42, 5F
推
09/16 22:46, , 6F
09/16 22:46, 6F
→
09/16 22:47, , 7F
09/16 22:47, 7F
→
09/16 22:50, , 8F
09/16 22:50, 8F
→
09/16 22:51, , 9F
09/16 22:51, 9F
推
09/16 22:52, , 10F
09/16 22:52, 10F
→
09/16 22:52, , 11F
09/16 22:52, 11F
推
09/16 22:53, , 12F
09/16 22:53, 12F
→
09/16 22:53, , 13F
09/16 22:53, 13F
推
09/16 22:53, , 14F
09/16 22:53, 14F
→
09/16 22:53, , 15F
09/16 22:53, 15F
推
09/16 23:00, , 16F
09/16 23:00, 16F
→
09/16 23:00, , 17F
09/16 23:00, 17F
→
09/16 23:00, , 18F
09/16 23:00, 18F
→
09/16 23:01, , 19F
09/16 23:01, 19F
→
09/16 23:01, , 20F
09/16 23:01, 20F
→
09/16 23:02, , 21F
09/16 23:02, 21F
推
09/16 23:02, , 22F
09/16 23:02, 22F
→
09/16 23:03, , 23F
09/16 23:03, 23F
推
09/16 23:05, , 24F
09/16 23:05, 24F
→
09/16 23:09, , 25F
09/16 23:09, 25F
→
09/16 23:15, , 26F
09/16 23:15, 26F
→
09/16 23:17, , 27F
09/16 23:17, 27F
推
09/16 23:28, , 28F
09/16 23:28, 28F
推
09/16 23:29, , 29F
09/16 23:29, 29F
噓
09/16 23:29, , 30F
09/16 23:29, 30F
→
09/16 23:30, , 31F
09/16 23:30, 31F
→
09/16 23:30, , 32F
09/16 23:30, 32F
推
09/16 23:30, , 33F
09/16 23:30, 33F
→
09/16 23:31, , 34F
09/16 23:31, 34F
推
09/16 23:33, , 35F
09/16 23:33, 35F
→
09/16 23:33, , 36F
09/16 23:33, 36F
推
09/16 23:41, , 37F
09/16 23:41, 37F
→
09/16 23:43, , 38F
09/16 23:43, 38F
→
09/16 23:43, , 39F
09/16 23:43, 39F
推
09/17 00:09, , 40F
09/17 00:09, 40F
推
09/17 00:45, , 41F
09/17 00:45, 41F
推
09/17 00:48, , 42F
09/17 00:48, 42F
→
09/17 00:48, , 43F
09/17 00:48, 43F
推
09/17 00:50, , 44F
09/17 00:50, 44F
推
09/17 01:10, , 45F
09/17 01:10, 45F
→
09/17 01:10, , 46F
09/17 01:10, 46F
推
09/17 02:19, , 47F
09/17 02:19, 47F
推
09/17 06:48, , 48F
09/17 06:48, 48F
推
09/17 07:43, , 49F
09/17 07:43, 49F
推
09/17 08:38, , 50F
09/17 08:38, 50F
推
09/17 08:45, , 51F
09/17 08:45, 51F
→
09/17 09:43, , 52F
09/17 09:43, 52F
推
09/17 12:06, , 53F
09/17 12:06, 53F
→
09/17 12:07, , 54F
09/17 12:07, 54F
→
09/17 12:07, , 55F
09/17 12:07, 55F
推
09/17 12:19, , 56F
09/17 12:19, 56F
→
09/17 12:23, , 57F
09/17 12:23, 57F
推
09/17 12:23, , 58F
09/17 12:23, 58F
推
09/17 19:26, , 59F
09/17 19:26, 59F
→
09/17 19:26, , 60F
09/17 19:26, 60F
→
09/17 19:26, , 61F
09/17 19:26, 61F
→
09/17 19:28, , 62F
09/17 19:28, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 19 之 41 篇):
討論
26
42
討論
-7
24
討論
394
491
討論
12
41
討論
100
185
討論
25
35
討論
10
31