[其他] 床墊汙損 房東要求原價賠償 是否合理?
爬過關於床墊的文章
看到大部分人的意見 都是偏向"房客不需賠償床墊汙損"
大概有這些說法:
「需在契約中要求使用床罩,否則不能要求房客賠償」
「床墊睡人本來就會髒,汙損屬於自然損壞」
但我遇到的房東 認為使用床罩屬於常識
且契約有規定要恢復原狀 因此汙損的床墊 不算是原狀
他說有汙損的床墊 沒人敢租 所以要換新的 要從押金扣新床墊的錢
而我想他也不是故意要扣錢 因為他說願意幫我把床墊載到我的新住處
或許他是真的認為 有人用過床墊 沒人敢用吧~
我想問的重點是
1.多數人的租屋觀念中 在契約沒規定需使用床罩下 房客是否該有自覺使用床罩?
2.若走法律途徑 在契約沒規定需用床罩下 通常司法會判定汙損屬於自然損壞嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 115.165.218.3
→
06/28 21:22, , 1F
06/28 21:22, 1F
→
06/28 21:23, , 2F
06/28 21:23, 2F
→
06/28 21:24, , 3F
06/28 21:24, 3F
→
06/28 21:24, , 4F
06/28 21:24, 4F
→
06/28 21:25, , 5F
06/28 21:25, 5F
→
06/28 21:27, , 6F
06/28 21:27, 6F
→
06/28 21:27, , 7F
06/28 21:27, 7F
→
06/28 21:28, , 8F
06/28 21:28, 8F
→
06/28 21:28, , 9F
06/28 21:28, 9F
推
06/28 21:46, , 10F
06/28 21:46, 10F
推
06/28 21:52, , 11F
06/28 21:52, 11F
→
06/28 22:35, , 12F
06/28 22:35, 12F
→
06/28 22:36, , 13F
06/28 22:36, 13F
→
06/28 22:36, , 14F
06/28 22:36, 14F
→
06/28 22:37, , 15F
06/28 22:37, 15F
→
06/28 22:38, , 16F
06/28 22:38, 16F
推
06/28 23:37, , 17F
06/28 23:37, 17F
→
06/28 23:59, , 18F
06/28 23:59, 18F
推
06/29 00:12, , 19F
06/29 00:12, 19F
→
06/29 02:03, , 20F
06/29 02:03, 20F
→
06/29 02:04, , 21F
06/29 02:04, 21F
→
06/29 02:04, , 22F
06/29 02:04, 22F
→
06/29 02:05, , 23F
06/29 02:05, 23F
→
06/29 02:41, , 24F
06/29 02:41, 24F
→
06/29 02:42, , 25F
06/29 02:42, 25F
→
06/29 02:43, , 26F
06/29 02:43, 26F
→
06/29 02:44, , 27F
06/29 02:44, 27F
→
06/29 02:45, , 28F
06/29 02:45, 28F
→
06/29 02:45, , 29F
06/29 02:45, 29F
→
06/29 02:50, , 30F
06/29 02:50, 30F
→
06/29 02:51, , 31F
06/29 02:51, 31F
→
06/29 02:52, , 32F
06/29 02:52, 32F
→
06/29 02:52, , 33F
06/29 02:52, 33F
→
06/29 02:53, , 34F
06/29 02:53, 34F
→
06/29 02:54, , 35F
06/29 02:54, 35F
→
06/29 03:01, , 36F
06/29 03:01, 36F
推
06/29 05:35, , 37F
06/29 05:35, 37F
→
06/29 05:36, , 38F
06/29 05:36, 38F
推
06/29 05:39, , 39F
06/29 05:39, 39F
推
06/29 10:17, , 40F
06/29 10:17, 40F
推
06/29 11:57, , 41F
06/29 11:57, 41F
→
06/29 12:46, , 42F
06/29 12:46, 42F
→
06/29 12:47, , 43F
06/29 12:47, 43F
→
06/29 12:47, , 44F
06/29 12:47, 44F