[討論] Intel m3-6Y30 vs atom Z8700

看板nb-shopping作者 (jones)時間8年前 (2016/04/14 11:19), 8年前編輯推噓10(10推 0噓 35→)
留言45則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
最近在考慮買surface 3還是miix700 當然先比較他的處理器 從下面網站的評比，m3贏z8700蠻多的 http://goo.gl/2sKtZv 但是為什麼常看別人都不太推薦m3 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.3.105 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/nb-shopping/M.1460603954.A.172.html ※ 編輯: ghost1006 (101.15.3.105), 04/14/2016 11:19:36
推
04/14 11:24, , 1F
因為平常是跟i5比才遜色許多，m還是大勝atom哦
04/14 11:24, 1F
推
04/14 12:26, , 2F
比克就算打不過賽亞人也是能屌打飲茶好嗎
04/14 12:26, 2F
推
04/14 12:29, , 3F
最近也在考慮SURFACE pro4 m3跟i5 不知m3在熱跟耗電上
04/14 12:29, 3F
→
04/14 12:29, , 4F
的表現如何~
04/14 12:29, 4F
→
04/14 12:57, , 5F
樓上 預算夠就i5
04/14 12:57, 5F
→
04/14 13:44, , 6F
04/14 13:44, 6F
→
04/14 13:44, , 7F
04/14 13:44, 7F
推
04/14 14:02, , 8F
謝謝大大無私分享
04/14 14:02, 8F
推
04/14 17:06, , 9F
04/14 17:06, 9F
→
04/14 17:07, , 10F
效能差了近30%
04/14 17:07, 10F
推
04/14 17:12, , 11F
不過Z87 TDP 4W, m3 TDP 7W
04/14 17:12, 11F
→
04/14 20:13, , 12F
樓上你這網站沒參考價值，綜合Cinebench R10、R11.5、
04/14 20:13, 12F
→
04/14 20:14, , 13F
R15，m3-6Y30 有 1.7~2.2 倍的 Z87 效能
04/14 20:14, 13F
→
04/14 20:15, , 14F
30% 實在是差太少了很有問題
04/14 20:15, 14F
→
04/14 20:16, , 15F
多看看notebookcheck和furmark還有tom's吧
04/14 20:16, 15F
→
04/14 20:16, , 16F
futuremark* 打錯
04/14 20:16, 16F
推
04/14 20:39, , 17F
上面那個notebookcheck的verdict是比較推m3而不是i5
04/14 20:39, 17F
→
04/14 20:39, , 18F
It seems that the entry-level model of the series
04/14 20:39, 18F
→
04/14 20:39, , 19F
with the Intel Core m3 is the best overall packa
04/14 20:39, 19F
→
04/14 20:39, , 20F
ge. The i5 model is more powerful, but the batter
04/14 20:39, 20F
→
04/14 20:39, , 21F
y runtimes take a serious hit.
04/14 20:39, 21F
→
04/14 20:43, , 22F
那應該是舊的verdict針對剛出來i5版本只有六個小時的續
04/14 20:43, 22F
→
04/14 20:43, , 23F
航所做的評論，你可以看到他電池測試是經過兩次更新的
04/14 20:43, 23F
→
04/14 20:43, , 24F
m3他們大推 There is no question that this is far
04/14 20:43, 24F
→
04/14 20:43, , 25F
and away the best rendition of the Surface conce
04/14 20:43, 25F
→
04/14 20:43, , 26F
pt to date—and the first one that, despite limit
04/14 20:43, 26F
→
04/14 20:43, , 27F
ations inherent to its design, might legitimately
04/14 20:43, 27F
→
04/14 20:43, , 28F
be considered as a suitable replacement for a co
04/14 20:43, 28F
→
04/14 20:43, , 29F
nventional laptop.
04/14 20:43, 29F
→
04/14 20:44, , 30F
當然啦 i5 版本有風扇續航力依然是遜於 m3
04/14 20:44, 30F
→
04/14 20:45, , 31F
我是覺得兩者都夠好了，看你需要怎麼樣的特性
04/14 20:45, 31F
→
04/14 20:45, , 32F
看要效能好一點還是續航好一點
04/14 20:45, 32F
推
04/14 20:47, , 33F
我一直覺得奇怪 很多人說m3不推 可是評測網站的說法
04/14 20:47, 33F
→
04/14 20:47, , 34F
看到大都是偏向好評
04/14 20:47, 34F
→
04/14 20:47, , 35F
core M 不推你去看 UX305 就知道了
04/14 20:47, 35F
→
04/14 20:49, , 36F
還有 SP4 的 core M 是可以用，因為不知道MS怎麼弄得
04/14 20:49, 36F
→
04/14 20:49, , 37F
他的散熱還算OK，其他家你去看就知道各種降頻
04/14 20:49, 37F
推
04/14 20:57, , 38F
搞不好有風扇阿
04/14 20:57, 38F
→
04/14 21:04, , 39F
NOPEE，你去菇狗surface pro 4 m3 teardown第一個就是了
04/14 21:04, 39F
→
04/14 21:05, , 40F
銅管是很硬朗啦，只是真的沒風扇還能不降頻讓我很訝異
04/14 21:05, 40F
→
04/14 21:16, , 41F
好強喔!!!!!! 看來手機可以來塞7.5W了(誤)
04/14 21:16, 41F
推
04/15 03:43, , 42F
我原本是用SURFACE3 Z8700效能真的差了點
04/15 03:43, 42F
→
04/15 03:43, , 43F
PRO3的I5版本當平板拿在手上又覺得燙手且耗電太快
04/15 03:43, 43F
→
04/15 03:46, , 44F
所以才會考慮PRO4的M3版本 (想著無風扇應該不會太燙XD)
04/15 03:46, 44F
→
07/05 12:37, , 45F
但不管怎樣i5u真的運算能力會比較好...
07/05 12:37, 45F
‣ 更多 ghost1006 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1N3mmo5o (nb-shopping)