[討論] 有關天才的禮物法律攻防
看過天才的禮物覺得相當感人,
只是有個法律攻防的問題,
當瑪麗生父出現在法院上聲明願將監護權給外婆的時候,
黑人律師利用很精采的辯護方式證明生父根本不聞不問,
所以當場法官就同意生父的聲明不成立,也就是生父無監護權。
那問題來了,外婆伊芙蓮在知道黛安懷孕之後就不聞不問,她也是經校長通知後才知道瑪
麗是天才。同理可證她跟生父一樣不聞不問。
為什麼黑人律師不直接用這點直接解決這場官司呢?畢竟法官已經很爽快的判決生父無監
護權了阿?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.63.100.7
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1505442008.A.4CD.html
推
09/15 10:54, , 1F
09/15 10:54, 1F
→
09/15 10:54, , 2F
09/15 10:54, 2F
→
09/15 10:54, , 3F
09/15 10:54, 3F
→
09/15 10:55, , 4F
09/15 10:55, 4F
→
09/15 10:55, , 5F
09/15 10:55, 5F
推
09/15 11:26, , 6F
09/15 11:26, 6F
→
09/15 11:26, , 7F
09/15 11:26, 7F
→
09/15 11:27, , 8F
09/15 11:27, 8F
→
09/15 11:29, , 9F
09/15 11:29, 9F
→
09/15 11:29, , 10F
09/15 11:29, 10F
推
09/15 12:03, , 11F
09/15 12:03, 11F
→
09/15 12:03, , 12F
09/15 12:03, 12F
推
09/15 12:16, , 13F
09/15 12:16, 13F
→
09/15 12:16, , 14F
09/15 12:16, 14F