[討論] 是不是沒有超能力的英雄導演比較好詮釋?
如提
雖然美國英雄電影 已經席捲是電影界很久了
可是很特別的是
不管是DC 還是M社
"電影上"最紅的超級英雄 幾乎多不是有超能力系列的超能英雄
例如
M社最紅的 鋼鐵人 美國隊長(都沒超能力)
卻比雷神索爾 或浩克還要紅
在DC也是 蝙蝠俠電影的人氣 比其他DC有超級能力的英雄還紅
雖然也是例外拉(如X戰警 蜘蛛人)
但嚴格來說 感覺沒超能力的英雄電影 導演是不是比較好發揮?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.221.209
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1459601791.A.091.html
→
04/02 20:59, , 1F
04/02 20:59, 1F
→
04/02 21:00, , 2F
04/02 21:00, 2F
推
04/02 21:00, , 3F
04/02 21:00, 3F
已經說有例外拉
※ 編輯: than09138 (36.235.221.209), 04/02/2016 21:01:00
→
04/02 21:00, , 4F
04/02 21:00, 4F
你講的 我內文都說例外了= =...
※ 編輯: than09138 (36.235.221.209), 04/02/2016 21:01:22
推
04/02 21:02, , 5F
04/02 21:02, 5F
→
04/02 21:02, , 6F
04/02 21:02, 6F
→
04/02 21:02, , 7F
04/02 21:02, 7F
推
04/02 21:03, , 8F
04/02 21:03, 8F
→
04/02 21:03, , 9F
04/02 21:03, 9F
→
04/02 21:03, , 10F
04/02 21:03, 10F
推
04/02 21:04, , 11F
04/02 21:04, 11F
→
04/02 21:05, , 12F
04/02 21:05, 12F
→
04/02 21:05, , 13F
04/02 21:05, 13F
→
04/02 21:06, , 14F
04/02 21:06, 14F
→
04/02 21:06, , 15F
04/02 21:06, 15F
→
04/02 21:07, , 16F
04/02 21:07, 16F
→
04/02 21:08, , 17F
04/02 21:08, 17F
→
04/02 21:08, , 18F
04/02 21:08, 18F
推
04/02 21:11, , 19F
04/02 21:11, 19F
→
04/02 21:11, , 20F
04/02 21:11, 20F
推
04/02 21:11, , 21F
04/02 21:11, 21F
→
04/02 21:11, , 22F
04/02 21:11, 22F
→
04/02 21:12, , 23F
04/02 21:12, 23F
可惜那些版權 幾乎沒人肯放回給m社
m社當初賣掉真可惜xd
→
04/02 21:13, , 24F
04/02 21:13, 24F
※ 編輯: than09138 (36.235.221.209), 04/02/2016 21:15:05
推
04/02 21:19, , 25F
04/02 21:19, 25F
推
04/02 21:21, , 26F
04/02 21:21, 26F
推
04/02 21:21, , 27F
04/02 21:21, 27F
→
04/02 21:23, , 28F
04/02 21:23, 28F
→
04/02 21:23, , 29F
04/02 21:23, 29F
推
04/02 21:23, , 30F
04/02 21:23, 30F
推
04/02 21:26, , 31F
04/02 21:26, 31F
→
04/02 21:26, , 32F
04/02 21:26, 32F
→
04/02 21:28, , 33F
04/02 21:28, 33F
→
04/02 21:28, , 34F
04/02 21:28, 34F
推
04/02 21:29, , 35F
04/02 21:29, 35F
還有 21 則推文
→
04/02 23:36, , 57F
04/02 23:36, 57F
→
04/02 23:37, , 58F
04/02 23:37, 58F
→
04/02 23:41, , 59F
04/02 23:41, 59F
推
04/02 23:41, , 60F
04/02 23:41, 60F
推
04/02 23:41, , 61F
04/02 23:41, 61F
→
04/02 23:41, , 62F
04/02 23:41, 62F
→
04/02 23:42, , 63F
04/02 23:42, 63F
→
04/02 23:42, , 64F
04/02 23:42, 64F
→
04/02 23:53, , 65F
04/02 23:53, 65F
推
04/03 00:02, , 66F
04/03 00:02, 66F
推
04/03 00:11, , 67F
04/03 00:11, 67F
→
04/03 00:11, , 68F
04/03 00:11, 68F
→
04/03 00:12, , 69F
04/03 00:12, 69F
推
04/03 00:15, , 70F
04/03 00:15, 70F
→
04/03 01:15, , 71F
04/03 01:15, 71F
推
04/03 01:41, , 72F
04/03 01:41, 72F
推
04/03 01:46, , 73F
04/03 01:46, 73F
→
04/03 01:46, , 74F
04/03 01:46, 74F
推
04/03 01:49, , 75F
04/03 01:49, 75F
→
04/03 01:49, , 76F
04/03 01:49, 76F
噓
04/03 10:18, , 77F
04/03 10:18, 77F
推
04/03 10:20, , 78F
04/03 10:20, 78F
推
04/03 12:27, , 79F
04/03 12:27, 79F
推
04/03 13:24, , 80F
04/03 13:24, 80F
推
04/03 13:55, , 81F
04/03 13:55, 81F
→
04/03 13:55, , 82F
04/03 13:55, 82F
→
04/03 14:54, , 83F
04/03 14:54, 83F
→
04/03 14:55, , 84F
04/03 14:55, 84F
→
04/03 14:56, , 85F
04/03 14:56, 85F
→
04/03 14:56, , 86F
04/03 14:56, 86F
推
04/04 00:44, , 87F
04/04 00:44, 87F
推
04/04 00:47, , 88F
04/04 00:47, 88F
→
04/04 00:47, , 89F
04/04 00:47, 89F
→
04/04 00:48, , 90F
04/04 00:48, 90F
→
04/04 00:48, , 91F
04/04 00:48, 91F
推
04/04 00:55, , 92F
04/04 00:55, 92F
推
04/04 11:01, , 93F
04/04 11:01, 93F
→
04/04 11:01, , 94F
04/04 11:01, 94F
→
04/12 20:28, , 95F
04/12 20:28, 95F
→
04/12 20:29, , 96F
04/12 20:29, 96F