[問題] 全新未拆機要求驗保固合理嗎?
請問一下如面交「全新未拆官網貨」的手機,
要求對方拆開必須是未開過機未開通過是否合理,
有可能官網買的貨會是有開過機開通過的嗎?
謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.71.218.8
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1447073922.A.62D.html
推
11/09 21:04, , 1F
11/09 21:04, 1F
→
11/09 21:08, , 2F
11/09 21:08, 2F
→
11/09 21:09, , 3F
11/09 21:09, 3F
→
11/09 21:14, , 4F
11/09 21:14, 4F
→
11/09 21:29, , 5F
11/09 21:29, 5F
→
11/09 21:29, , 6F
11/09 21:29, 6F
→
11/09 21:33, , 7F
11/09 21:33, 7F
推
11/09 21:35, , 8F
11/09 21:35, 8F
→
11/09 21:40, , 9F
11/09 21:40, 9F
推
11/09 21:44, , 10F
11/09 21:44, 10F
→
11/09 21:47, , 11F
11/09 21:47, 11F
推
11/09 22:19, , 12F
11/09 22:19, 12F
推
11/09 22:30, , 13F
11/09 22:30, 13F
→
11/09 22:31, , 14F
11/09 22:31, 14F
推
11/09 23:00, , 15F
11/09 23:00, 15F
→
11/09 23:00, , 16F
11/09 23:00, 16F
→
11/09 23:00, , 17F
11/09 23:00, 17F
推
11/09 23:35, , 18F
11/09 23:35, 18F
→
11/09 23:35, , 19F
11/09 23:35, 19F
→
11/10 00:06, , 20F
11/10 00:06, 20F
推
11/10 02:20, , 21F
11/10 02:20, 21F
→
11/10 02:30, , 22F
11/10 02:30, 22F
推
11/10 02:54, , 23F
11/10 02:54, 23F
→
11/10 10:59, , 24F
11/10 10:59, 24F