[閒聊] 某美國網紅:美國需要更長更重的聯結車,增加運輸效率
這個網紅說
「美國需要長度更長載重量更大的卡車,以提高載貨效率,也能降低運輸成本和物價」
「美國從雷根在1980年代放寬全國各州的拖車(不包含拖車頭)最大合法總重量上限到
80000磅,之後就已經有40多年沒更改道路運輸相關法規,讓卡車可以拖更長的拖車和載更
多更重的貨物」
「瑞典芬蘭已經通過新法律,允許長度更長(70公尺),總重量120噸的卡車上路,美國呢?」
我也覺得川普應該考慮簽署行政命令.讓美國各州能允許長度更長載重量更大的聯結車上路
--
「何というかな。ああ、生まれて来てよかった、そう思うことが何べんかあるだろう
。そのために生きてんじゃねえか。そのうちお前にもそういう時が来るよ、な？ まぁ
、がんばれ」。
男はつらいよ 39作目 寅次郎物語
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.24.74.62 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1746844646.A.CA8.html
→
05/10 10:41,
1周前
, 1F
05/10 10:41, 1F
推
05/10 10:45,
1周前
, 2F
05/10 10:45, 2F
→
05/10 10:47,
1周前
, 3F
05/10 10:47, 3F
→
05/10 10:47,
1周前
, 4F
05/10 10:47, 4F
→
05/10 10:50,
1周前
, 5F
05/10 10:50, 5F
推
05/10 11:20,
1周前
, 6F
05/10 11:20, 6F
推
05/10 11:52,
1周前
, 7F
05/10 11:52, 7F
→
05/10 11:58,
1周前
, 8F
05/10 11:58, 8F
推
05/10 12:00,
1周前
, 9F
05/10 12:00, 9F
推
05/10 12:21,
1周前
, 10F
05/10 12:21, 10F
推
05/10 12:22,
1周前
, 11F
05/10 12:22, 11F
→
05/10 12:22,
1周前
, 12F
05/10 12:22, 12F
推
05/10 12:27,
1周前
, 13F
05/10 12:27, 13F
→
05/10 12:27,
1周前
, 14F
05/10 12:27, 14F
推
05/10 12:38,
1周前
, 15F
05/10 12:38, 15F
這篇下面還有一段回文好狠
One VERY crucial detail was missing: US trucks are poorly made and designed.
They are 20 years behind the rest of the world. Driver comfort in EU trucks
is on another level, cabin noise is decimated. They maintenance cycles are
longer, they have cleaner emissions while using less moving parts to do it,
engines have more power, better fuel efficiency and they run cleaner because
they have better tolerances. There is no real magic in the engines: they are
just BETTER MADE! And US regulations do not allow those trucks to be used
because they are simpler in design. USA demands a certain way of doing things
that is archaic and make the engines run dirtier and provide less power and
wear out sooner.
Just looking at the frame alone, US truck industry install all the air lines
etc and then just sprays paint all over EVERYTHING. It is the cheapest way to
build it. It means unpainted surfaces are left behind, and all your
connectors are caked in paint. Doing it the hard way, painting it and then
installing everything is more expensive. Absolutely NO truck buyer accepts
that in Europe. In USA? They have no choice. You can not see that anywhere in
the world anymore, it is really something that belongs to the 80s. US semi
truck industry is fully insular, you can't import. This is what is going to
happen to every US industry with tariffs. They will stop innovating when
their entire market is just USA and they have captive audience: you don't
have a choice. So.. why would they put any money on research and development?
以下用Google翻譯:
「缺少一個非常關鍵的細節：美國卡車的製造和設計都很糟糕。他們比世界其他地區落後
20年。歐盟卡車的駕駛舒適度達到了另一個水平，駕駛室噪音也大大降低。它們的維護週
期更長，排放更清潔，同時使用的運動部件更少，引擎功率更大，燃油效率更高，並且由
於具有更好的耐受性，因此運行更清潔。引擎並沒有真正的魔力：它們只是做得更好！美
國法規不允許使用這些卡車，因為它們的設計更簡單。美國要求採用某種過時的做事方式
，使引擎運轉更髒，提供的動力更少，磨損更快。
僅看車架，美國卡車工業安裝了所有空氣管路等，然後在所有東西上噴漆。這是最便宜的
建造方式。這意味著未塗漆的表面會被留下，並且所有連接器都會沾上油漆。比較困難的
方法是，先噴漆，然後安裝所有東西，成本更高。在歐洲，絕對沒有卡車買家接受這一點
。在美國？他們別無選擇。在世界任何地方你都看不到了，這確實是屬於80年代的東西。
美國半卡車產業完全孤立，無法進口。這就是每個受到關稅影響的美國產業都會發生的情
況。當他們的整個市場都在美國並且他們擁有忠實的受眾時，他們將停止創新：你別無選
擇。那麼……他們為什麼要在研發上投入資金呢？」
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
看來美國的商用車比起美國的汽車/重機,跟世界潮流的脫節更大,更沒競爭力
推
05/10 12:47,
1周前
, 16F
05/10 12:47, 16F
→
05/10 12:49,
1周前
, 17F
05/10 12:49, 17F
推
05/10 12:56,
1周前
, 18F
05/10 12:56, 18F
推
05/10 13:18,
1周前
, 19F
05/10 13:18, 19F
推
05/10 13:56,
1周前
, 20F
05/10 13:56, 20F
→
05/10 14:19,
1周前
, 21F
05/10 14:19, 21F
→
05/10 14:19,
1周前
, 22F
05/10 14:19, 22F
推
05/10 14:43,
1周前
, 23F
05/10 14:43, 23F
→
05/10 14:43,
1周前
, 24F
05/10 14:43, 24F
推
05/10 14:47,
1周前
, 25F
05/10 14:47, 25F
→
05/10 15:56,
1周前
, 26F
05/10 15:56, 26F
推
05/10 16:01,
1周前
, 27F
05/10 16:01, 27F
→
05/10 16:01,
1周前
, 28F
05/10 16:01, 28F
推
05/10 16:08,
1周前
, 29F
05/10 16:08, 29F
→
05/10 16:23,
1周前
, 30F
05/10 16:23, 30F
推
05/10 17:04,
1周前
, 31F
05/10 17:04, 31F
推
05/10 21:10,
1周前
, 32F
05/10 21:10, 32F
→
05/10 23:48,
1周前
, 33F
05/10 23:48, 33F
※ 編輯: yamatobar (114.24.74.62 臺灣), 05/11/2025 01:04:22
→
05/11 04:05,
1周前
, 34F
05/11 04:05, 34F
→
05/11 13:40,
1周前
, 35F
05/11 13:40, 35F
→
05/11 13:40,
1周前
, 36F
05/11 13:40, 36F
推
05/11 19:46,
1周前
, 37F
05/11 19:46, 37F
→
05/13 10:56,
1周前
, 38F
05/13 10:56, 38F