[新車] 勁豪125/RAY125/X sense V4
《是否已閱讀置底文章『[新車] 2012主流車種比較』》
Yes
《是否至車行看過實車》
Yes
《欲比較之品牌及車種》
(1) 勁豪125
(2) RAY 125
(3) X sense V4 125
(4)
(5)
《車主需求》
1 男,身高174體重64,大學還有兩年畢業
2 之前都騎女友的RSZ100雙載(50kg),覺得很讚,所以馬力,舒適性有升級就好,看到很多人說勁豪馬力很弱,希望比RSZ強就好
3 車子爸媽出錢,但是以後耗材油錢靠自己,好像勁豪真的很省油?
4 騎過RSZ100和G5 150,希望大小重量在這兩者之間
5 置物空間希望大,看起來是勁豪>sense>RAY
6 用途就市區通勤,一個禮拜一次來回30KM的家教
7 兩年後畢業未來不知道需求如何
8 外型喜好:這三款都有霧面色很喜歡但,Xsense>勁豪>RAY
9 不改車,希望外觀比較不需要保養,不知道霧面色會不會比較容易損傷?
10 便宜一點比較不怕虐待他
《預算範圍》
80k以下
《補充說明》
第一次來這個版謝謝大家
-----
Sent from JPTT on my LGE LG-D838.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.172.189.69
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/biker/M.1475337274.A.309.html
推
10/01 23:59, , 1F
10/01 23:59, 1F
剛看了一下 好像不錯欸= = 可是這廠牌跟三大廠比 穩定性如何? 維修方便嗎?
→
10/01 23:59, , 2F
10/01 23:59, 2F
可是勁豪1公升比其他125能多騎10km?
推
10/02 00:00, , 3F
10/02 00:00, 3F
推
10/02 00:08, , 4F
10/02 00:08, 4F
RAY是好像看到很多人說耗油很差X
→
10/02 00:08, , 5F
10/02 00:08, 5F
→
10/02 00:10, , 6F
10/02 00:10, 6F
這點版上很長酸XDD
※ 編輯: nike319546 (218.173.159.127), 10/02/2016 00:19:18
推
10/02 00:23, , 7F
10/02 00:23, 7F
※ 編輯: nike319546 (223.138.229.81), 10/02/2016 00:27:45
→
10/02 00:27, , 8F
10/02 00:27, 8F
路上好像有看到,謝謝~
推
10/02 00:34, , 9F
10/02 00:34, 9F
→
10/02 00:34, , 10F
10/02 00:34, 10F
→
10/02 00:34, , 11F
10/02 00:34, 11F
→
10/02 00:34, , 12F
10/02 00:34, 12F
→
10/02 00:34, , 13F
10/02 00:34, 13F
→
10/02 00:34, , 14F
10/02 00:34, 14F
→
10/02 00:34, , 15F
10/02 00:34, 15F
→
10/02 00:34, , 16F
10/02 00:34, 16F
→
10/02 00:35, , 17F
10/02 00:35, 17F
→
10/02 00:35, , 18F
10/02 00:35, 18F
→
10/02 00:35, , 19F
10/02 00:35, 19F
NEX流口水了
→
10/02 02:15, , 20F
10/02 02:15, 20F
推
10/02 02:15, , 21F
10/02 02:15, 21F
→
10/02 02:15, , 22F
10/02 02:15, 22F
推
10/02 09:23, , 23F
10/02 09:23, 23F
外型不喜歡@@
推
10/02 09:48, , 24F
10/02 09:48, 24F
有點大台,跟RAY又差不多
推
10/02 11:20, , 25F
10/02 11:20, 25F
→
10/02 11:20, , 26F
10/02 11:20, 26F
→
10/02 11:20, , 27F
10/02 11:20, 27F
有不是飛旋的嗎?
→
10/02 11:20, , 28F
10/02 11:20, 28F
推
10/02 11:36, , 29F
10/02 11:36, 29F
馬力RSZ100對我就很夠了
→
10/02 11:36, , 30F
10/02 11:36, 30F
→
10/02 11:36, , 31F
10/02 11:36, 31F
→
10/02 11:37, , 32F
10/02 11:37, 32F
※ 編輯: nike319546 (218.173.159.127), 10/02/2016 11:44:02
推
10/02 11:48, , 33F
10/02 11:48, 33F
→
10/02 11:49, , 34F
10/02 11:49, 34F
推
10/02 11:57, , 35F
10/02 11:57, 35F
→
10/02 11:57, , 36F
10/02 11:57, 36F
→
10/02 11:57, , 37F
10/02 11:57, 37F
推
10/02 14:42, , 38F
10/02 14:42, 38F
→
10/02 15:20, , 39F
10/02 15:20, 39F
推
10/02 15:58, , 40F
10/02 15:58, 40F
推
10/02 17:34, , 41F
10/02 17:34, 41F
推
10/02 18:56, , 42F
10/02 18:56, 42F
→
10/02 18:56, , 43F
10/02 18:56, 43F
推
10/02 19:00, , 44F
10/02 19:00, 44F
→
10/02 19:02, , 45F
10/02 19:02, 45F
推
10/02 23:07, , 46F
10/02 23:07, 46F
推
10/03 00:29, , 47F
10/03 00:29, 47F
推
10/03 03:18, , 48F
10/03 03:18, 48F
→
10/03 03:18, , 49F
10/03 03:18, 49F
→
10/03 09:10, , 50F
10/03 09:10, 50F
推
10/03 09:46, , 51F
10/03 09:46, 51F
推
10/03 17:39, , 52F
10/03 17:39, 52F
推
10/04 10:50, , 53F
10/04 10:50, 53F
推
10/04 11:41, , 54F
10/04 11:41, 54F
推
10/06 02:34, , 55F
10/06 02:34, 55F
→
10/06 02:34, , 56F
10/06 02:34, 56F
推
10/06 02:36, , 57F
10/06 02:36, 57F
→
10/06 02:36, , 58F
10/06 02:36, 58F
推
10/10 09:45, , 59F
10/10 09:45, 59F