[請問] 死語/滅亡語言的問題
最近在看關於古百越語的資料,
有文章提到古百越語已經是死語
(wiki上又叫滅亡語言/滅絕語言)
當中是這樣定義的
"已經不再有人以之作為母語的語言"
以這定義來說,仍有人會講,
但不是作為母語的可能存在嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 45.76.209.182
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ask/M.1487587172.A.A08.html
→
02/20 18:41, , 1F
02/20 18:41, 1F
→
02/20 18:43, , 2F
02/20 18:43, 2F
→
02/20 18:48, , 3F
02/20 18:48, 3F
→
02/20 18:48, , 4F
02/20 18:48, 4F
→
02/20 18:49, , 5F
02/20 18:49, 5F
→
02/20 18:50, , 6F
02/20 18:50, 6F
→
02/20 18:50, , 7F
02/20 18:50, 7F
→
02/20 18:50, , 8F
02/20 18:50, 8F
推
02/20 19:04, , 9F
02/20 19:04, 9F
推
02/20 19:06, , 10F
02/20 19:06, 10F
→
02/20 19:08, , 11F
02/20 19:08, 11F
→
02/20 19:08, , 12F
02/20 19:08, 12F
→
02/20 19:09, , 13F
02/20 19:09, 13F
→
02/20 19:09, , 14F
02/20 19:09, 14F
→
02/20 19:10, , 15F
02/20 19:10, 15F
→
02/20 19:10, , 16F
02/20 19:10, 16F
→
02/20 19:10, , 17F
02/20 19:10, 17F
→
02/20 19:11, , 18F
02/20 19:11, 18F
→
02/20 19:12, , 19F
02/20 19:12, 19F
→
02/20 19:12, , 20F
02/20 19:12, 20F
→
02/20 19:13, , 21F
02/20 19:13, 21F
→
02/20 19:13, , 22F
02/20 19:13, 22F
→
02/20 19:13, , 23F
02/20 19:13, 23F
→
02/20 19:13, , 24F
02/20 19:13, 24F
→
02/20 19:14, , 25F
02/20 19:14, 25F
→
02/20 19:15, , 26F
02/20 19:15, 26F
→
02/20 19:15, , 27F
02/20 19:15, 27F
→
02/20 19:17, , 28F
02/20 19:17, 28F
→
02/20 19:17, , 29F
02/20 19:17, 29F
→
02/20 19:18, , 30F
02/20 19:18, 30F
→
02/20 19:18, , 31F
02/20 19:18, 31F
→
02/20 19:18, , 32F
02/20 19:18, 32F