[問題] 請問這樣是誰問題較大?消失
今天因生理期不準,去看了婦產診所,結果院長用腹部超音波照到左側卵巢有長東西
,因為去年已經有過一次腹腔鏡手術,院長聽完後說可能是畸胎瘤,因此下午去了另一間
診所自費再照一次超音波,一開始也是用腹部超音波但照不清楚,所以改用陰道超音波,
發現原來是一般肌瘤,肌瘤我以前就知道了
因此心裡放了一顆大石頭,但問題出在先生回家,我把今天的過程跟他說,他詢問什麼是
陰道超音波,我跟他解釋後,他問了一句
‘’老公檢查有沒有被用壞‘’
‘’老公檢查有沒有被用壞‘’
‘’老公檢查有沒有被用壞‘’
然後我就爆氣了...
我認為他把我當玩具,醫師做正常的檢查應該是問有沒有被用受傷吧?
而他認為我小題大作,他講話根本沒那個意思,壞掉就是受傷
他認為我有病,自己把他的意思解讀成這樣
但我認為他講話為什麼這麼白目
請問大家,有誰另一半會講出這種話?
而講這種話的人正不正常?
謝謝大家
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.24.130.56
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1538482804.A.239.html
→
10/02 20:23, , 1F
10/02 20:23, 1F
推
10/02 20:26, , 2F
10/02 20:26, 2F
→
10/02 20:26, , 3F
10/02 20:26, 3F
→
10/02 20:26, , 4F
10/02 20:26, 4F
→
10/02 20:26, , 5F
10/02 20:26, 5F
推
10/02 20:27, , 6F
10/02 20:27, 6F
→
10/02 20:27, , 7F
10/02 20:27, 7F
→
10/02 20:28, , 8F
10/02 20:28, 8F
推
10/02 20:29, , 9F
10/02 20:29, 9F
→
10/02 20:29, , 10F
10/02 20:29, 10F
→
10/02 20:29, , 11F
10/02 20:29, 11F
→
10/02 20:30, , 12F
10/02 20:30, 12F
→
10/02 20:30, , 13F
10/02 20:30, 13F
→
10/02 20:30, , 14F
10/02 20:30, 14F
推
10/02 20:30, , 15F
10/02 20:30, 15F
→
10/02 20:31, , 16F
10/02 20:31, 16F
→
10/02 20:32, , 17F
10/02 20:32, 17F
→
10/02 20:32, , 18F
10/02 20:32, 18F
→
10/02 20:32, , 19F
10/02 20:32, 19F
→
10/02 20:33, , 20F
10/02 20:33, 20F
→
10/02 20:34, , 21F
10/02 20:34, 21F
→
10/02 20:34, , 22F
10/02 20:34, 22F
→
10/02 20:34, , 23F
10/02 20:34, 23F
→
10/02 20:34, , 24F
10/02 20:34, 24F
推
10/02 20:36, , 25F
10/02 20:36, 25F
推
10/02 20:36, , 26F
10/02 20:36, 26F
推
10/02 20:37, , 27F
10/02 20:37, 27F
推
10/02 20:37, , 28F
10/02 20:37, 28F
推
10/02 20:38, , 29F
10/02 20:38, 29F
推
10/02 20:39, , 30F
10/02 20:39, 30F
推
10/02 20:41, , 31F
10/02 20:41, 31F
→
10/02 20:42, , 32F
10/02 20:42, 32F
→
10/02 20:43, , 33F
10/02 20:43, 33F
→
10/02 20:43, , 34F
10/02 20:43, 34F
推
10/02 20:45, , 35F
10/02 20:45, 35F
推
10/02 20:45, , 36F
10/02 20:45, 36F
→
10/02 20:45, , 37F
10/02 20:45, 37F
推
10/02 20:49, , 38F
10/02 20:49, 38F
推
10/02 20:52, , 39F
10/02 20:52, 39F
還有 155 則推文
推
10/03 09:36, , 195F
10/03 09:36, 195F
推
10/03 09:37, , 196F
10/03 09:37, 196F
→
10/03 09:37, , 197F
10/03 09:37, 197F
→
10/03 09:37, , 198F
10/03 09:37, 198F
推
10/03 09:42, , 199F
10/03 09:42, 199F
→
10/03 09:43, , 200F
10/03 09:43, 200F
推
10/03 10:52, , 201F
10/03 10:52, 201F
推
10/03 11:18, , 202F
10/03 11:18, 202F
→
10/03 11:18, , 203F
10/03 11:18, 203F
→
10/03 11:18, , 204F
10/03 11:18, 204F
→
10/03 11:46, , 205F
10/03 11:46, 205F
推
10/03 11:56, , 206F
10/03 11:56, 206F
→
10/03 11:56, , 207F
10/03 11:56, 207F
推
10/03 12:06, , 208F
10/03 12:06, 208F
→
10/03 12:16, , 209F
10/03 12:16, 209F
推
10/03 12:42, , 210F
10/03 12:42, 210F
→
10/03 12:42, , 211F
10/03 12:42, 211F
→
10/03 12:42, , 212F
10/03 12:42, 212F
推
10/03 12:45, , 213F
10/03 12:45, 213F
→
10/03 12:45, , 214F
10/03 12:45, 214F
推
10/03 14:16, , 215F
10/03 14:16, 215F
噓
10/03 14:43, , 216F
10/03 14:43, 216F
推
10/03 14:50, , 217F
10/03 14:50, 217F
推
10/03 15:37, , 218F
10/03 15:37, 218F
→
10/03 15:38, , 219F
10/03 15:38, 219F
推
10/03 16:49, , 220F
10/03 16:49, 220F
推
10/03 18:48, , 221F
10/03 18:48, 221F
推
10/03 18:49, , 222F
10/03 18:49, 222F
噓
10/03 20:58, , 223F
10/03 20:58, 223F
推
10/03 21:41, , 224F
10/03 21:41, 224F
推
10/03 21:46, , 225F
10/03 21:46, 225F
→
10/03 21:48, , 226F
10/03 21:48, 226F
→
10/04 02:52, , 227F
10/04 02:52, 227F
→
10/04 09:36, , 228F
10/04 09:36, 228F
→
10/04 09:38, , 229F
10/04 09:38, 229F
→
10/04 09:41, , 230F
10/04 09:41, 230F
→
10/04 09:41, , 231F
10/04 09:41, 231F
→
10/04 09:44, , 232F
10/04 09:44, 232F
推
10/04 09:54, , 233F
10/04 09:54, 233F
推
10/04 10:44, , 234F
10/04 10:44, 234F