[討論] 為什麼台灣男孩印象中日女比台女好呢?消失
各位親愛的鄉民晚安:
小魯素來有選擇障礙,
常常在二選一的問題中常常猶豫不絕,
今天就遇到了一個奇怪的選擇問題,如下:
正妹台女與普妹日女,你選誰?
正當我猶豫的時候,有朋友建議小魯,
這應該去問八卦版肥宅最準,
所以小魯就去發文問了。
但推文一直性地推日女,而且對於選擇台女
露出一副不可置信的語氣。
這結果讓小魯感到訝異,難道台女的印象有
這麼差嗎?
所以想來女孩版請教各位先進大大,
有什麼原因導致台男的印象中日女比台女好?
P.S.不要戰我,我不是母豬教徒。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.82.192.173
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1505737400.A.BA1.html
→
09/18 20:24, , 1F
09/18 20:24, 1F
→
09/18 20:27, , 2F
09/18 20:27, 2F
理性誤戰
推
09/18 20:27, , 3F
09/18 20:27, 3F
推
09/18 20:28, , 4F
09/18 20:28, 4F
→
09/18 20:28, , 5F
09/18 20:28, 5F
我會說日文她會說中文,可以互相溝通的階段
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:29:41
→
09/18 20:29, , 6F
09/18 20:29, 6F
推
09/18 20:29, , 7F
09/18 20:29, 7F
母豬教徒大概會說外國的屌比較好吃這類的話吧
推
09/18 20:30, , 8F
09/18 20:30, 8F
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:30:47
推
09/18 20:30, , 9F
09/18 20:30, 9F
→
09/18 20:30, , 10F
09/18 20:30, 10F
我只是好奇,如果只是個人觀感那沒什麼好討論的,但是某版是一致性的貶低台女,讓我
感到不可思議,現實中台男也這樣嗎?
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:32:38
→
09/18 20:31, , 11F
09/18 20:31, 11F
→
09/18 20:31, , 12F
09/18 20:31, 12F
我男的,其實我也想選奶大的,但是奶都不大我就猶豫了
→
09/18 20:31, , 13F
09/18 20:31, 13F
→
09/18 20:32, , 14F
09/18 20:32, 14F
推
09/18 20:32, , 15F
09/18 20:32, 15F
我也有很會煮飯的台女朋友,但是大家都說台女越來越不會煮飯惹,所以這是台女劣勢的
地方嗎?
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:34:37
推
09/18 20:33, , 16F
09/18 20:33, 16F
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:35:27
推
09/18 20:37, , 17F
09/18 20:37, 17F
→
09/18 20:37, , 18F
09/18 20:37, 18F
→
09/18 20:38, , 19F
09/18 20:38, 19F
→
09/18 20:38, , 20F
09/18 20:38, 20F
樓下幫我回答你的問題了唷!
推
09/18 20:41, , 21F
09/18 20:41, 21F
推
09/18 20:41, , 22F
09/18 20:41, 22F
→
09/18 20:41, , 23F
09/18 20:41, 23F
不太懂你的意思,什麼是吃得很甘願?
推
09/18 20:41, , 24F
09/18 20:41, 24F
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:45:57
推
09/18 20:45, , 25F
09/18 20:45, 25F
嗨~肥宅你好呀
※ 編輯: chris40610 (115.82.192.173), 09/18/2017 20:47:39
→
09/18 20:47, , 26F
09/18 20:47, 26F
→
09/18 20:47, , 27F
09/18 20:47, 27F
還有 143 則推文
還有 4 段內文
噓
09/19 05:37, , 171F
09/19 05:37, 171F
→
09/19 05:37, , 172F
09/19 05:37, 172F
→
09/19 05:37, , 173F
09/19 05:37, 173F
→
09/19 05:37, , 174F
09/19 05:37, 174F
→
09/19 05:37, , 175F
09/19 05:37, 175F
→
09/19 05:38, , 176F
09/19 05:38, 176F
推
09/19 06:19, , 177F
09/19 06:19, 177F
噓
09/19 06:30, , 178F
09/19 06:30, 178F
→
09/19 06:30, , 179F
09/19 06:30, 179F
→
09/19 06:30, , 180F
09/19 06:30, 180F
→
09/19 06:30, , 181F
09/19 06:30, 181F
→
09/19 06:30, , 182F
09/19 06:30, 182F
→
09/19 07:24, , 183F
09/19 07:24, 183F
噓
09/19 07:39, , 184F
09/19 07:39, 184F
噓
09/19 07:42, , 185F
09/19 07:42, 185F
推
09/19 07:48, , 186F
09/19 07:48, 186F
→
09/19 07:48, , 187F
09/19 07:48, 187F
推
09/19 08:29, , 188F
09/19 08:29, 188F
噓
09/19 08:33, , 189F
09/19 08:33, 189F
→
09/19 08:33, , 190F
09/19 08:33, 190F
推
09/19 08:56, , 191F
09/19 08:56, 191F
噓
09/19 09:01, , 192F
09/19 09:01, 192F
推
09/19 09:05, , 193F
09/19 09:05, 193F
推
09/19 11:44, , 194F
09/19 11:44, 194F
→
09/19 11:44, , 195F
09/19 11:44, 195F
→
09/19 12:06, , 196F
09/19 12:06, 196F
→
09/19 12:07, , 197F
09/19 12:07, 197F
→
09/19 12:07, , 198F
09/19 12:07, 198F
→
09/19 12:13, , 199F
09/19 12:13, 199F
推
09/19 14:02, , 200F
09/19 14:02, 200F
推
09/20 12:32, , 201F
09/20 12:32, 201F
→
09/20 12:33, , 202F
09/20 12:33, 202F
→
09/20 12:36, , 203F
09/20 12:36, 203F
→
09/20 12:37, , 204F
09/20 12:37, 204F
→
09/20 12:38, , 205F
09/20 12:38, 205F
→
09/20 12:38, , 206F
09/20 12:38, 206F
→
09/20 12:39, , 207F
09/20 12:39, 207F
→
09/20 12:40, , 208F
09/20 12:40, 208F
→
09/20 12:41, , 209F
09/20 12:41, 209F
→
09/20 20:29, , 210F
09/20 20:29, 210F