[問題] 公開性侵犯身份是對受害者的二次傷害?已回收
最近碰到幾件類似的案件,讓我困惑不已。
犯人的特質不外乎口裡仁義道德,心中男盜女娼,擺出一副很有理想抱負的樣子吸引女生
,然後在相處的過程中各種性騷擾,甚至是性侵得逞,令人不齒。
可是讓人困惑的是,犯人所處的團體,總是對犯人多所包庇,不允許別人把發生性侵的事
情對外公,布理由不外乎是「這是兩個人的事,不關其他人的事」或是「我們已經有在處
理了,外人不要插嘴」甚至是「現在重提舊事,只是對受害者的二次傷害」。
更令人不解的是,這些團體多半是成天高喊女權啊、性別意識啊的進步團體。
而且,維護犯人最不遺餘力的,又恰恰是團體中的女性成員...。
不知道女孩們對這種事情是什麼看法呢?有沒有人有類似經驗可以分享?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.218.91
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1458640332.A.6D0.html
→
03/22 17:56, , 1F
03/22 17:56, 1F
→
03/22 17:57, , 2F
03/22 17:57, 2F
噓
03/22 17:58, , 3F
03/22 17:58, 3F
→
03/22 17:59, , 4F
03/22 17:59, 4F
→
03/22 17:59, , 5F
03/22 17:59, 5F
→
03/22 17:59, , 6F
03/22 17:59, 6F
→
03/22 17:59, , 7F
03/22 17:59, 7F
可是瑞凡,她們真的天天一起相處啊...。
(雖然被性侵的不是她們就是了)
推
03/22 18:00, , 8F
03/22 18:00, 8F
→
03/22 18:00, , 9F
03/22 18:00, 9F
噓
03/22 18:02, , 10F
03/22 18:02, 10F
→
03/22 18:02, , 11F
03/22 18:02, 11F
→
03/22 18:03, , 12F
03/22 18:03, 12F
→
03/22 18:04, , 13F
03/22 18:04, 13F
有不同嗎?文章是說明狀況,標題是點明我想要討論的東西啊~
噓
03/22 18:04, , 14F
03/22 18:04, 14F
推
03/22 18:15, , 15F
03/22 18:15, 15F
※ 編輯: ALTHAN (140.112.218.91), 03/22/2016 18:19:57
→
03/22 18:35, , 16F
03/22 18:35, 16F
噓
03/22 18:39, , 17F
03/22 18:39, 17F
→
03/22 18:40, , 18F
03/22 18:40, 18F
→
03/22 18:41, , 19F
03/22 18:41, 19F
→
03/22 18:41, , 20F
03/22 18:41, 20F
→
03/22 18:42, , 21F
03/22 18:42, 21F
推
03/22 19:54, , 22F
03/22 19:54, 22F
→
03/22 19:55, , 23F
03/22 19:55, 23F
→
03/22 20:42, , 24F
03/22 20:42, 24F
→
03/22 20:42, , 25F
03/22 20:42, 25F
→
03/22 20:42, , 26F
03/22 20:42, 26F
→
03/22 21:04, , 27F
03/22 21:04, 27F
→
03/22 22:58, , 28F
03/22 22:58, 28F
噓
03/22 23:22, , 29F
03/22 23:22, 29F
→
03/22 23:22, , 30F
03/22 23:22, 30F
噓
03/22 23:26, , 31F
03/22 23:26, 31F
→
03/22 23:26, , 32F
03/22 23:26, 32F
→
03/22 23:26, , 33F
03/22 23:26, 33F
→
03/22 23:26, , 34F
03/22 23:26, 34F
噓
03/30 13:11, , 35F
03/30 13:11, 35F