[問題] 國考真的有濫缺嗎?已回收
新聞PO
國考持續退燒且「冷吱吱」。民國一○一年報名人數近八十萬人,創歷年新高。但之後各
項考試報名人數下降,去年只剩五十萬人;三年來銳減近卅萬人,是近九年來新低。
九十五年之前,國考報名人數一年不到五十萬。九十六年、九十七年金融海嘯後,國考帶
動轉業潮,不少失業中年人從高科技產業轉戰公職。此外,九十九年五都升格有用人需求
,開缺增加,分三年補足,都是報名人數大增的主因。
九十六年增為近五十三萬,九十七年成長到近六十萬,一路飆升到一○一年的近八十萬人
,創下歷史新高。其中五十一萬八千多人報考公職,史上第二多;另外有廿七萬多人報名
領隊導遊等專技證照考試,人數也創新高。
但之後各項考試開始退燒。一○二年一口氣掉了十萬,降到近六十九萬;一○三年再驟降
十五萬,只剩五十三萬多人。到去年已趨緩和,小降三萬多,剩下五十萬二千多人,是自
九十六年來新低。.....
但是看到這篇新聞跟台大碩士進清潔隊比 還有之前新北正妹公務員
以及理想結婚對象是公務員...
感覺公務員仍然是現在社會 C/P值最高的工作 那為何會退燒?
像之前的電子新貴一樣 大家都搶進竹科 台積電...
但是又有人說國考考上也是有雷缺 所以到底進公家穩 還是進民間或是國營?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.70.89.107
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1456067586.A.142.html
推
02/21 23:16, , 1F
02/21 23:16, 1F
→
02/21 23:16, , 2F
02/21 23:16, 2F
→
02/21 23:18, , 3F
02/21 23:18, 3F
推
02/21 23:21, , 4F
02/21 23:21, 4F
推
02/21 23:23, , 5F
02/21 23:23, 5F
推
02/21 23:26, , 6F
02/21 23:26, 6F
→
02/21 23:28, , 7F
02/21 23:28, 7F
→
02/21 23:28, , 8F
02/21 23:28, 8F
推
02/21 23:29, , 9F
02/21 23:29, 9F
→
02/21 23:29, , 10F
02/21 23:29, 10F
→
02/21 23:29, , 11F
02/21 23:29, 11F
→
02/21 23:31, , 12F
02/21 23:31, 12F
推
02/21 23:31, , 13F
02/21 23:31, 13F
推
02/21 23:33, , 14F
02/21 23:33, 14F
推
02/21 23:35, , 15F
02/21 23:35, 15F
→
02/21 23:35, , 16F
02/21 23:35, 16F
推
02/21 23:39, , 17F
02/21 23:39, 17F
推
02/21 23:55, , 18F
02/21 23:55, 18F
→
02/21 23:56, , 19F
02/21 23:56, 19F
→
02/21 23:56, , 20F
02/21 23:56, 20F
→
02/21 23:57, , 21F
02/21 23:57, 21F
推
02/21 23:57, , 22F
02/21 23:57, 22F
爽缺應該舉薦吧? 會弄出來考的應該都是人要的爛缺?
推
02/22 00:08, , 23F
02/22 00:08, 23F
→
02/22 00:08, , 24F
02/22 00:08, 24F
推
02/22 00:20, , 25F
02/22 00:20, 25F
推
02/22 00:28, , 26F
02/22 00:28, 26F
推
02/22 00:39, , 27F
02/22 00:39, 27F
推
02/22 00:50, , 28F
02/22 00:50, 28F
推
02/22 00:59, , 29F
02/22 00:59, 29F
推
02/22 01:21, , 30F
02/22 01:21, 30F
推
02/22 01:31, , 31F
02/22 01:31, 31F
→
02/22 01:32, , 32F
02/22 01:32, 32F
→
02/22 01:33, , 33F
02/22 01:33, 33F
推
02/22 01:34, , 34F
02/22 01:34, 34F
→
02/22 01:34, , 35F
02/22 01:34, 35F
推
02/22 01:36, , 36F
02/22 01:36, 36F
推
02/22 01:38, , 37F
02/22 01:38, 37F
→
02/22 01:38, , 38F
02/22 01:38, 38F
→
02/22 01:38, , 39F
02/22 01:38, 39F
推
02/22 01:40, , 40F
02/22 01:40, 40F
→
02/22 01:40, , 41F
02/22 01:40, 41F
推
02/22 07:01, , 42F
02/22 07:01, 42F
推
02/22 08:13, , 43F
02/22 08:13, 43F
推
02/22 08:45, , 44F
02/22 08:45, 44F
推
02/22 08:57, , 45F
02/22 08:57, 45F
推
02/22 08:59, , 46F
02/22 08:59, 46F
→
02/22 08:59, , 47F
02/22 08:59, 47F
推
02/22 09:47, , 48F
02/22 09:47, 48F
→
02/22 09:47, , 49F
02/22 09:47, 49F
→
02/22 10:10, , 50F
02/22 10:10, 50F
推
02/22 10:43, , 51F
02/22 10:43, 51F
推
02/22 11:06, , 52F
02/22 11:06, 52F
推
02/22 11:09, , 53F
02/22 11:09, 53F
負磁場是甚麼??? 不董? 那爽缺跟屎缺 都不會在簡章上 只能靠關係?
※ 編輯: auser1777 (211.72.13.109), 02/22/2016 11:28:02
→
02/22 11:38, , 54F
02/22 11:38, 54F
→
02/22 11:38, , 55F
02/22 11:38, 55F
→
02/22 11:39, , 56F
02/22 11:39, 56F
→
02/22 11:43, , 57F
02/22 11:43, 57F
推
02/22 11:43, , 58F
02/22 11:43, 58F
→
02/22 14:00, , 59F
02/22 14:00, 59F
→
02/22 14:01, , 60F
02/22 14:01, 60F
→
02/22 14:01, , 61F
02/22 14:01, 61F
推
02/22 14:21, , 62F
02/22 14:21, 62F
→
02/22 14:21, , 63F
02/22 14:21, 63F
→
02/22 14:56, , 64F
02/22 14:56, 64F
→
02/22 14:57, , 65F
02/22 14:57, 65F
推
02/22 21:42, , 66F
02/22 21:42, 66F