Re: [閒聊] 抑鬱的景勝?
看板WarringState作者PrinceKanto (PrinceKanto)時間9年前 (2016/05/04 22:15)推噓38(38推 0噓 66→)留言104則, 22人參與討論串1/1
※ 引述《BerITh (經典款大龜頭葛格)》之銘言:
: 最近在看真田丸
: 對於上山景勝這個腳色突然覺得很有趣
: 這位繼任上杉謙信的男子,似乎從來沒揚眉吐氣的一刻?
: 自御館之亂後繼任為家督面對一連串的打擊
: 在柴田勝家不斷的侵略失去越中
: 後來不得以臣服秀吉,被移封到會津
: 在這齣戲裡也老是一副苦瓜臉模樣
: 這不快樂的景勝...似乎很艱苦的經營著家業啊..
小弟之前是看MOD的大河劇"天地人",
劇情演得讓小弟感覺(純粹是觀影心得而已),直江兼續對豐臣家的外交關係做得太好
,直江兼續跟石田三成交情實在是好到誇張,讓上杉景勝坐上五大老位置,領俸祿一百
二十萬石。
上杉景勝真的是蠻苦瓜的武將大名人生啊!前期是活在御屋形上杉謙信的陰影下,後期
又有直江兼續這個譽滿天下到功高震主的首席家老,人活得這樣能快樂的起來嗎?
天地人這部戲裡面有幾段上杉景勝,印象很深刻,上來請益大家!
一段是豐臣秀吉死後,德川家康藉端藉事整肅石田三成,直江兼續在上杉景勝抱不平時
,上杉景勝竟然回答說:你也別太保護石田三成了,太為他說話會失去正確判斷
歷史上,上杉景勝有試圖去疏遠直江兼續與石田三成的關係嗎?
另外一段是,小山評定後,東軍退兵轉往西邊,直江兼續等一干家臣堅持追擊東軍將必
勝,但上杉景勝堅持反對所以作罷。
歷史上,不追擊東軍是上杉景勝自己做的決定嗎?
倘若真的追擊撤退中的東軍,依照當時的局勢,上杉軍會大勝嗎?
(這齣戲把德川家康描寫得太壞又太弱,所以小弟很好奇若站在客觀的立場上,上杉家
追擊東軍真得會有勝算嗎?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.118.96.136
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WarringState/M.1462371320.A.D7D.html
※ 編輯: PrinceKanto (122.118.96.136), 05/04/2016 22:18:39
推
05/04 22:37, , 1F
05/04 22:37, 1F
→
05/04 22:37, , 2F
05/04 22:37, 2F
→
05/04 22:37, , 3F
05/04 22:37, 3F
推
05/04 22:39, , 4F
05/04 22:39, 4F
推
05/04 22:41, , 5F
05/04 22:41, 5F
→
05/04 22:42, , 6F
05/04 22:42, 6F
→
05/04 22:42, , 7F
05/04 22:42, 7F
→
05/04 22:43, , 8F
05/04 22:43, 8F
→
05/04 22:43, , 9F
05/04 22:43, 9F
推
05/04 22:45, , 10F
05/04 22:45, 10F
推
05/04 22:45, , 11F
05/04 22:45, 11F
→
05/04 22:46, , 12F
05/04 22:46, 12F
→
05/04 22:46, , 13F
05/04 22:46, 13F
→
05/04 22:46, , 14F
05/04 22:46, 14F
→
05/04 22:46, , 15F
05/04 22:46, 15F
→
05/04 22:52, , 16F
05/04 22:52, 16F
推
05/04 22:56, , 17F
05/04 22:56, 17F
推
05/04 22:56, , 18F
05/04 22:56, 18F
→
05/04 22:57, , 19F
05/04 22:57, 19F
→
05/04 22:59, , 20F
05/04 22:59, 20F
→
05/04 22:59, , 21F
05/04 22:59, 21F
→
05/04 23:02, , 22F
05/04 23:02, 22F
推
05/04 23:03, , 23F
05/04 23:03, 23F
→
05/04 23:03, , 24F
05/04 23:03, 24F
→
05/04 23:06, , 25F
05/04 23:06, 25F
→
05/04 23:07, , 26F
05/04 23:07, 26F
→
05/04 23:07, , 27F
05/04 23:07, 27F
推
05/04 23:08, , 28F
05/04 23:08, 28F
→
05/04 23:08, , 29F
05/04 23:08, 29F
→
05/04 23:09, , 30F
05/04 23:09, 30F
推
05/04 23:12, , 31F
05/04 23:12, 31F

→
05/04 23:14, , 32F
05/04 23:14, 32F
推
05/04 23:19, , 33F
05/04 23:19, 33F
推
05/04 23:35, , 34F
05/04 23:35, 34F
→
05/04 23:36, , 35F
05/04 23:36, 35F
→
05/04 23:37, , 36F
05/04 23:37, 36F
→
05/04 23:37, , 37F
05/04 23:37, 37F
推
05/04 23:38, , 38F
05/04 23:38, 38F
→
05/04 23:49, , 39F
05/04 23:49, 39F
還有 25 則推文
推
05/05 14:37, , 65F
05/05 14:37, 65F
推
05/05 15:31, , 66F
05/05 15:31, 66F
→
05/05 15:31, , 67F
05/05 15:31, 67F
推
05/05 16:22, , 68F
05/05 16:22, 68F
推
05/05 16:24, , 69F
05/05 16:24, 69F
推
05/05 16:46, , 70F
05/05 16:46, 70F
推
05/05 17:04, , 71F
05/05 17:04, 71F
→
05/05 17:09, , 72F
05/05 17:09, 72F
→
05/05 17:11, , 73F
05/05 17:11, 73F
→
05/05 17:11, , 74F
05/05 17:11, 74F
→
05/05 17:12, , 75F
05/05 17:12, 75F
→
05/05 17:13, , 76F
05/05 17:13, 76F
→
05/05 17:15, , 77F
05/05 17:15, 77F
→
05/05 17:16, , 78F
05/05 17:16, 78F
推
05/05 17:26, , 79F
05/05 17:26, 79F
→
05/05 17:27, , 80F
05/05 17:27, 80F
→
05/05 17:29, , 81F
05/05 17:29, 81F
→
05/05 17:29, , 82F
05/05 17:29, 82F
推
05/05 17:41, , 83F
05/05 17:41, 83F
推
05/05 18:06, , 84F
05/05 18:06, 84F
→
05/05 18:06, , 85F
05/05 18:06, 85F
→
05/05 18:06, , 86F
05/05 18:06, 86F
推
05/05 19:24, , 87F
05/05 19:24, 87F
→
05/05 19:24, , 88F
05/05 19:24, 88F
推
05/05 19:36, , 89F
05/05 19:36, 89F
→
05/05 19:37, , 90F
05/05 19:37, 90F
推
05/05 20:09, , 91F
05/05 20:09, 91F
→
05/05 20:42, , 92F
05/05 20:42, 92F
推
05/05 21:15, , 93F
05/05 21:15, 93F
推
05/05 23:55, , 94F
05/05 23:55, 94F
→
05/06 00:23, , 95F
05/06 00:23, 95F
推
05/06 00:30, , 96F
05/06 00:30, 96F
推
05/06 01:25, , 97F
05/06 01:25, 97F
推
05/06 01:49, , 98F
05/06 01:49, 98F
→
05/06 01:49, , 99F
05/06 01:49, 99F
推
05/06 09:37, , 100F
05/06 09:37, 100F
→
05/06 12:56, , 101F
05/06 12:56, 101F
→
05/06 13:31, , 102F
05/06 13:31, 102F
→
05/06 14:04, , 103F
05/06 14:04, 103F
推
05/14 11:42, , 104F
05/14 11:42, 104F