[情報] Storm's Q&A

看板Wargaming作者WillieHuang (Willie)時間9年前 (2015/06/17 22:35)推噓18(18推 0噓 48→)

留言66則, 20人參與討論串1/1

連兩篇長篇…很累但值得 wwww - According to Storm the known Russian videomaker Murazor is "producing crap as usual" (Murazor made a video where he criticized WG for not implementing the Xbox One graphics to the PC version of WoT); Storm 表示 Murazor 他「按照慣例又在屁話了」（Murazor 是俄國知名網路影片製作人。他發了一部影片批評說 WG 不把 WoT XB One 版的畫質移植到 PC 版上） - Storm "does not promise" significant graphic improvements in WoT this year: "we are focused on something else"; Storm「不保證」今年 WoT 會有大規模的畫質進化；「我們在努力其他東西」 - Storm does not remember discussing the option to use the same crew for 2-3 tanks, it is not planned; Storm 不記得有討論過 2～3 台車共用組員的想法；這不在計畫內 - Havok: "when it's done it's done"; Havok 『WIDID』 - IS-3 is more popular than KV-1 on RU server; 俄服中 IS-3 比 KV-1 還熱門 - It's possible that KV-1 in HD will come this year; KV-1 可能在今年 HD 化 - Storm cannot estimate how realistic would it be to export the Xbox One client to 64bit Windows; Storm 無法估計將 XB One 版移植到 64位元 WIN 上的可行性 - Storm is not happy that "unfortunately many people spend time corellating Wargaming promises and failures: it's a Big Office problem"; 略 - KV-5 buff? Storm states that he saw its statistics half a year ago and he doubts anything changed since then. If it was buffed, it would be imbalanced. - KV-5 is doing fine statistically and is in top one third in effectiveness on its tier; - Currently, KV-5 is not imbalanced, it is "seriously the same as other premiums"; KV-5 不會 buff；他的表現數據在其階級中排在前1/3 - According to Storm, PC World of Tanks will have better graphics than Xbox One version and it will not take forever; Storm 表示 PC 版的畫面將會比 XB One 版還要好，不會無限延宕 - Storm is looking forward to Fallout 4; Storm 很期待《異塵餘生4》（譯者：上古少女帶槍版 wwwwww） - Q: "When do you plan to switch IS-6?" A: "Why switch it?"; 對於更換 IS-6 有啥計畫？A:「為啥要換？」 - Storm on HD models: "HD tank models are difficult to produce. They have to be realistic. They get fixed many times over, they get reworked and switched many times between the outsourcer and the customer. HD houses and stones are simplier to model by several orders of magnitude. I think that they will come faster." 「HD 車輛很難做。需要符合實際；要多次修正；在客戶和外包商之間來回修改好幾次。 HD 房子和石頭的建模要簡單多了。我認為它們的進度會比較快。」 - Jagdtiger 88 and Tiger II are both already being reworked to HD; 88獵虎和虎王已經 HD 化 - Developers wanted to make the HD models realistic from the very start but Storm admits it might have been easier to do them from the start; 開發人員從一開始就想讓 HD 模型符合現實，但 Storm 承認剛開始的時候比較不嚴謹 - HD T34 is also being developed; T34 正在 HD 化 - Developers do not plan to switch Bigworld to another engine, they plan to develop it further; 沒計畫更換遊戲引擎 - "Almost nothing is left" of the original Bigworld graphics engine, everything was reworked and improved; 原始的 BW 引擎「幾乎沒有剩下了」，所有部分都曾被重製或改進過 - New modes, improved matchmaker, artillery rebalance and new features - Storm: "Three things of this list are being worked on right now"; 新模式、MM娘改進、自走砲重平衡及新功能；Storm:「目前正在處理上列三件事」 - There "is no way back" when it comes to HD models, developers cannot leave one half with low quality; HD 化「已經不能回頭了」；不可能叫剩下3/4的車繼續用低畫質 - Storm confirms that WG is working both on new graphics and MM improvement; WG 正在處理新的繪圖和分房改進 - Storm on why Xbox One WoT will have 400 HD tanks straight away: "The content requirements there are lower and their tanks will have lower quality than our HD tanks. They reworked the tanks to HD regardless of historical references, they simply added more polygons to existing models. We are reworking them by completely reassembling the reference pack for each vehicle. Maybe our variant is not the right one but it is what it is." XB One 版一開始就有400輛 HD 化車輛，Storm 表示：「他們對內容的要求較低，模型品質也比 PC 版差。他們的重製只是將舊模型的多邊形數量提升，沒有參照史實的參考資料 PC 版每台車輛都是完全比照參考資料重製。或許我們的方法不對，但是事情就是這樣。」 - T-54 turret will not be reworked further; 不會更動 T-54 的砲塔 - There are plans to rework the T-54 HD model because it seems to be inferior to other HD models in quality; 預計將 HD T-54 再重製過，因為他和其他 HD 模型比起來品質較差 - Storm states that whether to rework everything at once or to spread content over multiple patches is one of the most complicated questions; 要一次搞定所有東西，還是分散在各次更新中一步步改進；Storm 表示這是最困難的問題 - Storm states that multiturret mechanism is mostly pointless as usually it is so that one turret has a powerful gun and the rest has some peashooters and Storm doesn't know what good they are for anyway. Multiturret mechanism is overrated according to him but it will be implemented at some point in the future nonetheless. Storm 表示『多砲塔機制』幾乎沒有意義，因為通常只有一個砲塔搭載具威力的主砲，而剩下的只是小牙籤，Storm 不知道它們要來做啥。他說『多砲塔機制』的價值被高估了，但還是會在未來的某個時間點實裝它。 - Additionally, multiturret mechanism needs a large rewrite of a huge chunk of base code. There are like 10 multiturret vehicles suitable for the game and most of the additional guns cannot seriously influence gameplay, that's why it was postponed. 承上，『多砲塔機制』需要大規模重寫基礎程式碼。大概有10台多砲塔戰車能塞進 WoT 中。而絕大多數的副砲都無法對遊戲性產生重大影響，所以它被擱置。 - WG has "many ideas" about perk and skill rework, including a complete crew system overhaul; WG 對技能重製有「許多想法」，包括重製整個組員系統 - Storm is playing a lot of internal testing sessions, he has little time to play random battles; Storm 參加很多內部測試，能玩隨機戰鬥的時間少 - Storm agrees that the current situation is that bloggers and videomakers are agitating their readers into pointlessly attacking Wargaming and its employees. Storm: "WG accepts criticism normally - but criticism, not shit throwing"; Storm 認同目前的狀況是部落客和網路影片製作者會煽動讀者胡亂攻擊 WG 及其員工。 Storm：「WG 接受批評；批評，但不是抹黑。」（譯者：隔壁 WT？且聽 Jingles 怎麼說 https://youtu.be/7Qj1KG8EDaU

25:57） - Storm on why is is sometimes vulgar to players: "you get the same answers as the questions you ask"; 為啥有時會對玩家粗口？Storm:「你問什麼問題，我就怎麼回答」 - There are no "bonuses" (in RNG or elsewhere) in the game for experienced players. 有經驗的玩家並不會因為老，就得到『好處』（RNG 或其他） http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/06/storms-q.html -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.213.249 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Wargaming/M.1434551744.A.A51.html

推

AzureArcana

06/17 22:44, , 1^F

06/17 22:44, 1^F

推

goldensnitch

06/17 22:57, , 2^F

06/17 22:57, 2^F

→

shaunten

06/17 23:08, , 3^F

06/17 23:08, 3^F