[情報] 1/8 9 Q&A
- you end up on one map too often? “Conspiracy!” (SS: Conspiracy my ass,
ever since Christmas half of my battles are fucking Erlenberg, I hate that
map already)
為啥常常進同一張地圖？「這是陰謀！」（SS: 陰你大頭啦，我從聖誕節以來有一半的
戰鬥都是進天殺的 Erlenberg，我已經厭惡這張地圖了）
- it’s possible non-European (Brazilian, Argentinian) tanks that don’t fit
any branch will appear in the game (Q: “How will you implement them?” A: “
Electronically” (SS: as in, “bits and bytes”))
塞不進科技樹的非歐洲戰車（巴西、阿根廷）還是有可能出現在遊戲中（「怎麼放？」
「用電子式的方法」（SS: 其實意思是「慢慢出」））
（譯：大量贈送的禮品車的好來源？話說這笑話真冷…）
- it’s possible more autoloader branches will come (Q: “Which nations will
they be for?” A: “For those that need it”)
可能還有更多有自動裝填的車（「會是那個國家的？」「有自動裝填機的國家」）
（譯：我還盼望著獵豹w/自動裝填88）
- vehicle tier does not influence choice of the maps you are getting (SS:
apart from the cases where maps are limited to low tiers only)
車階高低不會影響進哪張地圖（SS: 除了低階車限定的地圖之外。）
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/08/8-1-2013/
- both penetration and damage of shells are decided separately and
independently, that’s the reason why high-pen shells don’t do more damage
to targets with thin armor
- SerB states that it’s not true that when hitting thin armor, a shell
retains more of its kinetic energy and thus it does more damage
傷害和穿深是分開計算的，所以高穿深砲彈打在較薄的裝甲上不會產生較高傷害。
SerB 表示「因為砲彈穿透較薄裝甲時剩餘的動能較大，所以造成的傷害較大」並不正確
- SerB states that the bot-detecting system is working
正在做偵測「bot」的系統
（譯：個人感覺機器人代練的情況還不大嚴重啊？不過有備無患）
- not everything will be destructable in the new physics system (SS: for
example bridges won’t be)
新物理系統中並非所有東西都可被摧毀（SS: 例如說，橋不能炸）
- IS-6 has not become the most numerous tier 8 heavy tank after the New Year
event
經過新年任務後，IS-6 並沒有變成數量最多的八階重坦。
- LT role on city maps, according to SerB: “recon, scouting and raiding the
rear”
在城市地圖中輕坦的角色是「偵查、開光和側襲」，SerB 說。
- in historical battles, the vehicles fighting Tiger II will be just like in
real life: T-34/85, SU-100, IS and ISU-152 (“as many as it is necessery”)
史實戰鬥中，能對上虎王的車有 T-34/85、SU-100、IS 和 ISU-152。
- there will not be “multi-stage” historical battles (SS: as in, players
starting on lower tiers and spawning with higher tier vehicles)
不會有『多階段』史實戰鬥（SS: 讓玩家從低階車一路打到高階車）
- Soviet vehicles without 122mm guns fighting Tiger II’s and Ferdinands in
historical battles? “Oskin managed to do it somehow even without a 122mm gun
”
史實戰鬥中祖國得在沒有傳家122砲的情況下面對虎王和肥迪南？「當年 Oskin 辦到了」
（譯：Alexander Oskin 用 T-34/85 擊毀三輛虎王另擊傷一輛）
- improving sky textures has low priority
改善天空品質的優先度很低
- fire mechanics apparently won’t be changed
不會改動火災機制
- Q: “What’s with the draws in team battles?” A: “Fight to win then, we
do not mind”
「團隊戰鬥怎麼會搞成有平手的結果？」「那想辦法獲勝吧，沒人攔你。」
- there will be quick (one click) crew moving between tanks and there will
also be an option to quickly retrain the entire crew to a new vehicle
會做一鍵轉移/重訓組員的功能。
- Type 59 is worse than T-34-2 “by the fact the T-34-2 has the top gun and
some others too, like mobility”
59式比 T-34-2 差，「因為 T-34-2 有頂砲，而且其他方面像是機動也較佳。」
- according to Storm, tank drifting is realistic
戰車甩尾的動作符合現實
- invisible walls do not exist practically anywhere on the maps according to
Storm, apart from extreme cases like the castle on the Himmelsdorf map
地圖中沒有隱形的牆，Himmelsdorf 中的城堡是例外。
- Storm stated it’s possible that a tank will be able to move somehow even
when it loses one track, he has been convinced by seeing documents that it’s
possible
Storm 說，以後可能會把被斷履的戰車改成仍有能力移動，文獻記載說服了他。
新地圖的原型：
http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/421052_original.jpg
對了，位於 Taktikal Press 的 WG 辦公室被 FSB 踹門，起因是某個白痴舉報那裡在生
產打算在 Sochi 奧運上發動恐怖攻擊所使用的有毒果汁。
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/09/9-1-2014/
--
In church, they say to forgive!
Forgiveness is between them and God;
it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.169.100
推
01/10 03:05, , 1F
01/10 03:05, 1F
推
01/10 03:08, , 2F
01/10 03:08, 2F
推
01/10 03:16, , 3F
01/10 03:16, 3F
→
01/10 04:52, , 4F
01/10 04:52, 4F
推
01/10 06:32, , 5F
01/10 06:32, 5F
推
01/10 07:01, , 6F
01/10 07:01, 6F
→
01/10 07:01, , 7F
01/10 07:01, 7F
我總場數不到200，進了5次新地圖
→
01/10 07:02, , 8F
01/10 07:02, 8F
→
01/10 07:03, , 9F
01/10 07:03, 9F
→
01/10 07:03, , 10F
01/10 07:03, 10F
→
01/10 07:05, , 11F
01/10 07:05, 11F
→
01/10 07:05, , 12F
01/10 07:05, 12F
MM娘沒這麼勤勞
推
01/10 07:08, , 13F
01/10 07:08, 13F
→
01/10 07:08, , 14F
01/10 07:08, 14F
推
01/10 07:44, , 15F
01/10 07:44, 15F
→
01/10 08:01, , 16F
01/10 08:01, 16F
推
01/10 08:34, , 17F
01/10 08:34, 17F
太破壞平衡了
推
01/10 08:41, , 18F
01/10 08:41, 18F
推
01/10 08:54, , 19F
01/10 08:54, 19F
→
01/10 09:32, , 20F
01/10 09:32, 20F
推
01/10 09:44, , 21F
01/10 09:44, 21F
→
01/10 09:45, , 22F
01/10 09:45, 22F
推
01/10 10:18, , 23F
01/10 10:18, 23F
推
01/10 10:19, , 24F
01/10 10:19, 24F
推
01/10 10:45, , 25F
01/10 10:45, 25F
→
01/10 11:15, , 26F
01/10 11:15, 26F
推
01/10 11:19, , 27F
01/10 11:19, 27F
→
01/10 11:21, , 28F
01/10 11:21, 28F
→
01/10 11:37, , 29F
01/10 11:37, 29F
推
01/10 11:42, , 30F
01/10 11:42, 30F
推
01/10 11:51, , 31F
01/10 11:51, 31F
推
01/10 13:04, , 32F
01/10 13:04, 32F
→
01/10 14:00, , 33F
01/10 14:00, 33F
→
01/10 14:00, , 34F
01/10 14:00, 34F
推
01/10 14:02, , 35F
01/10 14:02, 35F
應該辦不到「原地」迴旋；絕對無法走直線且操控性幾乎為零
推
01/10 14:55, , 36F
01/10 14:55, 36F
→
01/10 14:56, , 37F
01/10 14:56, 37F
只靠一邊履帶硬拖，接地輪應該也滾的動吧？但是速度大減且完全無法操縱方向
至於履帶全掉之前的可操控的行駛距離取決於履帶斷在哪；WG應該不會搞的這麼詳細吧
推
01/10 15:03, , 38F
01/10 15:03, 38F
※ 編輯: WillieHuang 來自: 42.75.101.96 (01/10 16:59)
推
01/10 17:01, , 39F
01/10 17:01, 39F
→
01/10 17:02, , 40F
01/10 17:02, 40F
→
01/10 17:02, , 41F
01/10 17:02, 41F
→
01/10 17:19, , 42F
01/10 17:19, 42F
蘇聯BT系：BT-2、BT-7
A-20 是最後一台輪履兩用戰車；它和只能用履帶的 A-32 一同參加蘇芬戰爭
因為輪式無法滿足越野需求，最後蘇聯將 A-32 改良後成為大名鼎鼎的 T-34
美國：T7 Combat Car
英國：Tetrarch、Alecto
這兩輛是系出同門，後者是由前者的改良版（LT Mk.Ⅷ）的車體改裝的
五階以上沒半輛可免疫斷履的車
推
01/10 18:25, , 43F
01/10 18:25, 43F
推
01/10 18:28, , 44F
01/10 18:28, 44F
推
01/10 19:01, , 45F
01/10 19:01, 45F
→
01/10 19:02, , 46F
01/10 19:02, 46F
本來就不是這樣設計的，亂用會壞很正常
我比較好奇的是，沒了履帶，動力輪又碰不到地面的狀況下要怎麼動？
※ 編輯: WillieHuang 來自: 223.143.160.226 (01/10 22:09)
→
01/10 22:34, , 47F
01/10 22:34, 47F
→
01/10 22:35, , 48F
01/10 22:35, 48F
推
01/11 13:04, , 49F
01/11 13:04, 49F
推
01/11 13:07, , 50F
01/11 13:07, 50F
→
01/11 13:07, , 51F
01/11 13:07, 51F
推
01/12 16:44, , 52F
01/12 16:44, 52F
推
01/14 03:07, , 53F
01/14 03:07, 53F