[情報] Kankou的日本戰車Q&A節譯

看板Wargaming作者hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)時間12年前 (2013/09/20 20:41)推噓12(12推 0噓 10→)

留言22則, 16人參與討論串1/1

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/20/japanese-qa-answers/ 完整版請自行看原文，我只挑我認為重要的問答翻譯，另外沒有具體回答的問題也不翻。 Answering: Daigensui (“the Mother of Japanese tanks”) :) 回答者Daigensui(原ID=Kankou)，SS開始稱她為日本戰車之母了XDDD Hello everyone, Yesterday, Daigensui promised to answer some questions and here are the results. Keep in mind that she can’t say everything, especially when it comes to ingame matters – due to agreements with WG. 從這邊可以側面確認WG應該是委託Kankou(和SoukouDragon?)進行日本戰車的相關研究，這些Q&A在保密協定範圍內。 1. Regarding Japanese tanks – what will be their specifics in World of Tanks? How will they differ from other branches? 問：與其他國家相比，日本戰車的特色是什麼？ Balancing isn’t really my jurisdiction, since I’m mostly working with the historical research area. Still, from what I’ve been hearing, generally we’ re looking at vehicles with good terrain passibility, good depression (-10° minimum except for a few exceptions), lower penetration but higher alpha when compared to same caliber guns, and possibly generally good camouflage. 我不負責遊戲平衡，我的主要工作範圍是歷史研究。就我所知，日本戰車會有良好的越野能力(譯註：受益於日本戰車履帶普遍有較低的接地壓力)、良好的俯角(少數例外之外都會有-10度)、與他國相比，同口徑砲會有較低的穿甲搭配較高的alpha傷害 (譯註：日本戰車砲彈彈頭裝藥量普遍較大，例如75mm一式徹甲彈的彈頭內裝的RDX炸藥和德國88mm砲彈大約相等)，此外可能有不錯的隱蔽性。 4. What will be the characteristics of the tier 10 medium tank, the STB1, compared to T-62A? 問：TXMT STB-1和T-62A相比，它的特色會在哪裡？ I would say it’s a 105 mm armored T-62A, with less armor in the hull and lower penetration in exchange for greater firepower. 我認為它是裝了105砲的T-62A，車體裝甲和穿甲能力較差，但是火力比較強。 6. It is widely know that Japanese classification of medium tanks differed from the standard of other nations. Therefore a Chi-Ha in the Japanese tree is a medium tank where in reality it was only a light tank compared to something like M4 or PzIV. Performance-wise, can we expect these tanks to be somewhere like fake mediums (at least the lower tree tanks) as the Crusader is balanced in the game? 問：一般認為日本對於中戰車的定義與其他國家不同，例如九七式被日本自己認定為中戰車，但是與其他國家戰車(M4/Pz.IV)相比只是輕戰車。就表現來說，如果我們假定這些日本中戰車是偽輕坦(像是十字軍那樣)，它們在遊戲中會平衡嗎？ It is difficult to say that the Japanese system was different from other standards, given how the vehicles were classified by standards of when they were developed. Just because later vehicles like M4 Sherman or Pz.Kpfw. IV used standards of their days does not mean Japanese standards were different. This is shown in the latter Chi-Nu/Chi-To/Chi-Ri. 基本上日本的戰車分類和其他國家沒有什麼差異，九七式以它的發展年代(1936)來說的確是中戰車，比它晚研發出來的戰車(譯註：因此噸位更重、火力與裝甲更好)被界定為中戰車並不代表日本有一套不同的標準。三式、四式、五式都可以證明。 7. Was there ever an autoloading, fully oscillating turret that the Japanese developed? 問：日本有開發過搖架式砲塔或是自動裝填裝置嗎？ Oscillating, no. Autoloading (in the sense of WoT’s autoloader), yes. 沒有搖架式，但是(以WoT的定義來說)有自動裝彈機。 10. Will in your opinion these tanks be implemented? 強者我朋友問的問題：以下的車輛會放入遊戲嗎？ 1.Type 89　八九式─會 2.Experiment Type 1 試製一式戰車─有可能，但是要更多資料 3.Type 5 Chi-Ri 2 五式二型─有可能(但是基於很多原因，有可能不會) 4.Type 61 Kai ( Or will we see the tier 9 ST-A1 gets 105mm? ) 六一式改(或者T9的STA會拿到L7？)─會 Yes, maybe (need more data), maybe (although skeptical for various reasons), yes 11. Will the STB feature hydro pneumatic suspension to give it its gun depression, or will it be done via buffing the depression of the gun itself – or will they leave it without compensation? 問：STB可以藉由可變液氣懸吊系統讓主砲可以壓更低，這個機制會引入遊戲中、直接把車體的俯角算進砲塔俯角、或是乾脆無視這個機制，讓STB只有砲塔俯角？ Can’t say about the suspension, since that’s a purely techical aspect which I have no notification of. However, regardless of it, I personally support a -6° depression for the turret, for both historical and balancing reasons. 無法回答，因為這是技術問題，我不知道內情。不過我個人認為只有砲塔的-6度就好，基於平衡與歷史兩方面的理由。 12. What will the Type 61′s penetration be like in the game? 問：61式的穿甲會是多少？ Assuming we go with the historical gun 90 mm Tank Gun Type 61 (and not the conceptual 105 mm upgunned Kai), it has been calculated to 217 mm. 如果以史實的61式90mm戰車砲(不管升級為105砲的61改計畫)為準，計算結果是217。 (譯註：強者我同學對這個數據略感懷疑，以同規格砲彈來說，61式主砲的砲口初速度大約是90mm M41的1.06倍，也就是大約1.12倍的動能。M41在遊戲中是173pen，61式除非把APC當一般彈打，不然應該沒辦法到217。) 15. In a previous FTR article, it was commented that the Japanese flag (white field, red circle) was not used in Japanese tanks (with one known exception), and so you (Daigensui) informed Wargaming. Now we can see in the trailer that all the Japanese tanks have this flag painted on their turrets. So, what’s gonna happen at the end? Which will be the symbol of the Japanese tanks? Still discussing things, although given how that’s done with a completely different department (which does its own things and I have trouble knowing what they are doing), I’m not sure how things will turn out. If nothing is changed, expect the Hinomaru to be the insignia. TLDR：沒出問題的話日本戰車會有日之丸塗裝。 (希望這次某個半島南半邊的玩家不要再集體出來鬧場了) 17. What shell types did the Japanese mostly use? As in, apart from the L7 clone on the tier10, will we be getting heat-gold or apcr-gold? 問：日本戰車主要用什麼彈種？TX的L7先不管，金彈會是APCR還是HEAT？ APHE with occasional AP shots and Ta-Tan (HEAT). APCR was not developed/used. APHE和某些AP和タ弾(HEAT)，日本沒有開發/使用APCR。 18. Is there any chance of national consumables? 問：有任何關於成員消耗品的消息嗎？ I have my candidates, but the decision is done by a different department (which personally I do not trust). 我有我自己偏好的消耗品（譯註：明治水果糖），但是這是某個我自己不信任的部門負責的(譯註：不知道WG會弄出什麼怪東西，八成是壽司或拉麵啥的..) 20. Are there any posible tanks for high tier premium? (7,8 tier) 問：有任何高階金幣車的候選車種嗎？ There is a Tier VIII medium premium candidate. 有一台T8MT。(譯註：有可能是チリII，不過不確定) 23. Will there be japanese arty? 問：有自走砲線嗎？ Obviously. 當然。 30. What is the average crew count on Japanese tanks? Do they often differ from each other in this aspect or are they pretty much uniform? 問：平均組員數量是幾人？會隨車階變動還是保持一定數量？ Early/small vehicles were four, late-war were five, postwar were four. 早期／輕型車輛是四人，二戰晚期五人，戰後四人。 34. What kind of elite configurations can we expect from the Japanese tanks? Will they be historical, or will they be “extrapolations” of fitting better guns that were never put in IRL, like the long 88 in a Tiger or the L/100 in the Panther? 問：日本戰車的菁英車數值會是史實設定，或是安裝史實上從來沒裝過的裝備，例如虎式的長88砲或是豹式的超級75砲那樣？ All of the initially released vehicles will have their historically mounted guns as their elite configuration, with the exception of Type 61 Kai (105 mm gun was planned, but cancelled with the start of the STB program). Side note: 8,8 cm KwK 43 L/71 was actually tested on Tiger. Germany didn’t start manufacturing that version since Tiger Ausf. B was coming up. 所有第一波釋出的車(61改例外，在61式上面安裝105砲的計畫因為STB開始發展而廢棄) 都會把史實裝備作為菁英設定。順便一提：虎式裝71倍徑砲也是史實設定且有做過實車試驗，只是因為開始生產虎王，因此KwK43虎式沒有生產。(譯註：請自己看Robert Doyle的著作。) 35. A while back SoukouDragon wrote an article about the CHi-Ri and mentioned that there were no plans to miunt the 88 L56 in it and the turret was so large in order to accommodate for an autoloaded 75 mm. The same article also mentiones the type 5 88mm gun that could fit into the turret. Did the devs ignore those options or is it possible we will see them on the Chi-Ri ingame? 問：之前SoukouDragon的文章有提到五式チリ並不打算安裝88mmL56，但是砲塔空間不僅足以容納自動裝填版的75mm砲，也可以安裝五式88mm砲。開發組會無視這個意見，還是我們會看到這些砲被裝到五式上？ The developers and I have decided not to use the gun unless it is required for balancing purposes. However, I’m pretty sure that a gun which is marginally better than the ingame 8,8 cm KwK 36 L/56 is not going to help against Tier IX vehicles. 製作組和我基本決定除非有平衡上的理由，不然不會把88砲裝上去。不過我很確定一門大約和88mm/L56差不多的砲對付T9車是沒用的。 -- Wild Player: "MM keeps kicking me in my fricking balls" My friend : "SerB:' Don't grow balls.' " -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.100.191

推

ken80117

09/20 20:53, , 1^F

09/20 20:53, 1^F

推

yuki2474

09/20 20:56, , 2^F

09/20 20:56, 2^F

推

abc12812

09/20 21:05, , 3^F

09/20 21:05, 3^F