[情報] 7/15-16 Q&A

看板Wargaming作者hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)時間12年前 (2013/07/17 01:10)推噓10(10推 0噓 11→)

留言21則, 11人參與討論串1/1

這兩天Q&A很少，SerB和Storm同時消失的樣子。不知道是不是結伴去了哪個窮鄉僻壤的戰車博物館。 = NA這次的週間任務不錯，今天21場的額外收入是135000(拿了三次)，勝場14場。 = - German armor too thin at welds (meeting point) of upper and lower frontal armor? SerB considers it a conspiracy theory SerB認為德國戰車裝甲厚度在上下裝甲板銲接點太薄的說法純屬陰謀論 - BT-7 is not equipped with a historical 76mm gun ingame, because for that it would need 3rd turret – if it is ever added, SerB will think about it (and this concerns T-26 too) BT-7沒有裝史實的76砲，因為要裝那門砲必須在遊戲中放入第三個砲塔。如果說第三個砲塔真的放進遊戲，SerB會再考慮76砲的事情。 (T-26)是同一個狀況。 - this area in T110E3 is easily penetrable, it’s the commander’s copula: 110E3正面有個可以輕鬆打穿的地方，是車長觀測窗。 http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Wr4VJcS5a9k.jpg

- some player was moaning about AMX 13 105AM arty, that its gun is too weak for its tier, a developer (Marschig) says that by transferring it to tier 5, its MM spread has actually decreased than it was before 某個玩家在抱怨105AM的砲以一台T5來說太鳥，開發組的Marschig表示拉階之後的5階會面對的敵人比拉階前的4階來的弱，沒什麼好抱怨的。 - the thickness of the bottom armor of the tank is also historical (in other words: if a HE shell lands under the tank, the splash will encounter the bottom armor, which is practically non-existent. 戰車底部裝甲厚度也是史實設定。 (SS：也就是說如果把HE打到戰車下面，爆風計算會把底部裝甲算進去──即使戰車底部的裝甲水準幾乎可以忽略不計算。) - Komarin and Swamp are still bound to return at some point Komarin和Swamp還在施工中，請耐心等待。 -- 30 second countdown, someone types the master plan: "All the noobs rush the hill and the rest def" random guy: "What is def ?" "You, rush the hill..." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.143.14 ※ 編輯: hsinhanchu 來自: 36.231.143.14 (07/17 01:10)

推

acebruce

07/17 01:20, , 1^F

07/17 01:20, 1^F

推

willkommen

07/17 01:29, , 2^F

07/17 01:29, 2^F

→

willkommen

07/17 01:29, , 3^F

07/17 01:29, 3^F