[情報] 6/10 Q&A
WoWP刷起來比想像中的累,到處都有人在倒數場數就算了,還得隨時提防那種滿腦子
場數的人整架飛機撞上來.........
首先是開發組Vallter的問答
- woman crewmembers and kill barrel rings are unlikely to be ever implemented
女性組員和擊破數塗裝不打算做
- as mentioned in earlier posts, Superpershing rebalance is still being
discussed, at this moment there is no plan for SP penetration buff
超潘最新進度:暫時沒打算buff穿甲力,討論中
- premium consumable price will likely stay as it is now, that 10k on test
server is for test purpose only
金幣消耗品價格應該不會動,PT上面的數據是測試用。
- 8.8 will not bring US vehicle branch (SS: as it was speculated earlier),
but there will be something interesting in it
8.8不會是美國線,但是會有好玩的東西
- Waffenträger E-100 gun being 150mm L/68? “No comment, but you will like it
” (SS: earlier, it was confirmed it won’t be the 210mm gun, so there are
various options, including 150mm L/68 or 128mm FlaK 45)
WTE-100會有150mm L68嗎?
「不予置評,反正你會喜歡」(目前確認不會是210,所以可能是150L68或是自動裝填(?)的
128mm )
- Firefly will be implemented after other tanks, that were promised earlier
螢火蟲會出,但是要等
- Garage battles most likely won’t come in 2013
車庫模式今年大概不會出現
- Superpershing historically had a GAF V8 engine (450-500hp), it’s not SP
that is underpowered, it’s M26 that is unhistorically buffed
超潘史實引擎是GAF V8,並不是超潘的機動力被定太低(史實就是那麼慢),是M26拿到
不符合史實的高性能引擎。
- you will be able to sell Superpershing for gold after it gets changed, so
players have the opportunity to try it out
如果相信WG的話就去買台超潘玩吧,反正以後可以賣。
- at this moment, the visual camo system (you can buy only one of each type)
will stay as it is
視覺迷彩效果(只能買一種)暫時不變動
Vallter explains camouflage:
Camouflage bonus as a result of using camo net and camouflage was multiplied
on the camouflage value of the given tank. This resulted in the situation
when the tank with good camouflage (i.e. tanks of average size) enjoyed more
advantages – for instance, if camouflageof the tank was 30% (relative value)
and together with the camo net it made the following 30% * 1.25 = 37.5% –
7.5% difference. At the same time tanks with bad camouflage (i.e. tanks of a
big size) this effect was very insignificant. – when the tank had 5%
camouflage, together with camo net it made 5% * 1.25 = 6.25% – 1.25%
difference. The coefficient from camo net and camouflage itself was equal for
all vehicles – 1.25 and 1.05 respectively.
Bonus to camouflage from camo net and camouflage will now (starting from 8.6)
be added to the camoflage value of that tank. In other words, camouflage and
camo net use will provide a fixed bonus to the vehicle’s camouflage, which
doesn’t depend on tank’s parameter but depending on the type of the
vehicle. Due to the fact that during summarizing, old camo net and camouflage
coefficients (+25% and +5%) would have influenced more – for instance, for
the tank with 30%camouflage and camo net the overall rate would have been 30%
+ 25% = 55%, their value has been degraded and distinguished by types of
vehicles – SPG and HT acquire a small bonus, LT and MT – average bonus, and
TDs – a big bonus (the camo net bonus is still bigger than simply a bonus
from camouflage – i.e. bonus from camo net for SPGs and HT is greater than
bonus from camouflage for TDs).
大意:現行的隱蔽系統是相乘(基本值*偽裝網*迷彩),基本值受車的尺寸影響,
大車的效果不好。
8.6會改為相加(基本值+偽裝網+迷彩),基本值改為受車種影響,TD>LT=MT>HT=SPG
Regular Q&A:
Q&A部分
- tracks have various armor thickness, which doesn’t directly depend on
vehicle weight and type of the vehicle
履帶有不同的裝甲厚度,這個數字和車重/車種不直接相關
- toughness of tracks (SS: and it’s not clear, whether hitpoints, armor, or
simply module thickness are meant here, even to the player asking) is 3 times
bigger in the center of the tracks module than on its edges, it’s connected
with the fact that a loss of one supporting wheel is not as critical as a
loss of a roadwheel)
履帶中央的強度(不知道問的是模組血量、裝甲強度還是單純的物體深度)是邊緣的三倍
,原因是路輪受損比頂支輪受損嚴重得多。
- the reason of 50 meter automatic detection distance is somewhat realistic:
at this distance, the infantry supporting the tanks can hear another tank and
warn the tank crew. However, as SerB states: “want realism? join the army”
50m強制開光是因為伴隨步兵在這個距離可以聽到其他戰車且警告友方。
不過SerB還是表示「追求真實,國軍人才招募中心歡迎您」。
- there will be no infantry in WoT, because it would raise the game age
restriction
不會有步兵,因為加步兵會讓遊戲分級變動。
- apparently (SS: and this is based on one Russian blog post), chat rules are
practically not enforced on test server. A player tried to report some other
players for advertising some botting or fake gold seller, got told that
Support doesn’t deal with tickets regarding test server, SerB stated only
that developers don’t deal with this
PT似乎不會管制遊戲中交談內容,有玩家回報有些人在廣告掛機、詐騙之類的,客服
回應「不處理測試服的內容」,SerB表示是「開發組不管這些事」。
- developers, even the big boss (V.Kisly) pay for gold
開發組都掏錢買黃金,大頭也這樣。
- the purpose of test server is not for players to test all the vehicles (SS:
SerB replies on whine that other vehicles than arties are practically
impossible to test)
SerB回應某玩家抱怨測試服除了SPG之外根本沒得混:「測試服不是給你拿來玩爽爽的」
- SerB states that stats such as these are possible even without botting
(102k battles, 48 W/R)
SerB表示不靠掛機是有可能達成102K場48% (大概是幾個人輪班打吧...)
- apparently, there were cases, where some developers were banned from the
game and forums too, for breaking the rules
有些開發組成員似乎因為違反規則也被ban(論壇和遊戲都是)
- there is a theory on RU forums that in the 2nd German TD line, the tier 10
TD will be the Jpz E-100, in the first line it will be replaced by Jagdmaus.
SerB: “No comment” (SS: that would be truly retarded, as performance-wise,
those vehicles were very close to each other. And yes, there was a Jagdmaus
project.)
RU有個謠傳是JPE-100會被拉到WT線去,空位由獵鼠取代。
SerB表示:「懶得理你」。
(SS:這個點子超蠢,獵鼠和JPE在定位上太相近了。另外沒錯,真的有獵鼠計劃)
- will some high-caliber guns be nerfed somehow in connection with their
increased accuracy in 0.8.6? “If needed.”
「大口徑砲會因為8.6的精度提升而被nerf回來嗎?」
「有必要的話(潛台詞:有沒有必要我們講了算)」
--
- Q: "All tier 10 heavies lost their meaning!"
- A: "Checked your stats, shrugged, didn't read further"
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 36.231.149.88
→
06/11 02:24, , 1F
06/11 02:24, 1F
推
06/11 02:26, , 2F
06/11 02:26, 2F
推
06/11 02:32, , 3F
06/11 02:32, 3F
→
06/11 02:42, , 4F
06/11 02:42, 4F
推
06/11 03:04, , 5F
06/11 03:04, 5F
推
06/11 03:05, , 6F
06/11 03:05, 6F
推
06/11 03:08, , 7F
06/11 03:08, 7F
推
06/11 03:12, , 8F
06/11 03:12, 8F
→
06/11 03:13, , 9F
06/11 03:13, 9F
→
06/11 03:17, , 10F
06/11 03:17, 10F
→
06/11 03:19, , 11F
06/11 03:19, 11F
推
06/11 03:21, , 12F
06/11 03:21, 12F
推
06/11 03:50, , 13F
06/11 03:50, 13F
推
06/11 04:02, , 14F
06/11 04:02, 14F
→
06/11 04:02, , 15F
06/11 04:02, 15F
推
06/11 04:15, , 16F
06/11 04:15, 16F
→
06/11 04:15, , 17F
06/11 04:15, 17F
→
06/11 04:28, , 18F
06/11 04:28, 18F
→
06/11 04:29, , 19F
06/11 04:29, 19F
推
06/11 04:30, , 20F
06/11 04:30, 20F
推
06/11 08:01, , 21F
06/11 08:01, 21F
→
06/11 08:01, , 22F
06/11 08:01, 22F
→
06/11 08:01, , 23F
06/11 08:01, 23F
→
06/11 08:05, , 24F
06/11 08:05, 24F
推
06/11 08:07, , 25F
06/11 08:07, 25F
推
06/11 08:12, , 26F
06/11 08:12, 26F
推
06/11 09:31, , 27F
06/11 09:31, 27F
→
06/11 09:31, , 28F
06/11 09:31, 28F
→
06/11 09:32, , 29F
06/11 09:32, 29F
→
06/11 09:33, , 30F
06/11 09:33, 30F
推
06/11 10:04, , 31F
06/11 10:04, 31F
推
06/11 10:14, , 32F
06/11 10:14, 32F
→
06/11 10:14, , 33F
06/11 10:14, 33F
→
06/11 10:26, , 34F
06/11 10:26, 34F
推
06/11 10:32, , 35F
06/11 10:32, 35F
推
06/11 10:34, , 36F
06/11 10:34, 36F
推
06/11 10:38, , 37F
06/11 10:38, 37F
→
06/11 10:42, , 38F
06/11 10:42, 38F
推
06/11 10:45, , 39F
06/11 10:45, 39F
推
06/11 12:38, , 40F
06/11 12:38, 40F
推
06/11 14:28, , 41F
06/11 14:28, 41F
推
06/11 14:59, , 42F
06/11 14:59, 42F
推
06/11 14:59, , 43F
06/11 14:59, 43F
→
06/11 14:59, , 44F
06/11 14:59, 44F