個人覺得WHO FCTC公布的報告其實寫的蠻中肯的，為什麼到了反菸團體的手上，
解讀可以偏差到如此程度，台灣電子煙產業需要平衡報導的聲音！
疑問：董氏基金會為何沒將 2016 FCTC 世界卫生组织 烟草控制框架公约報告放在官網上。
ABILITY OF ENDS/ENNDS TO AID SMOKERS TO QUIT SMOKING ：
16. The scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of ENDS/ENNDS as a
smoking cessation aid is scant and of low certainty, making it difficult
to draw credible inferences. A 2014 review59 based on two randomized clinical trials (RCTs)
concluded that although the analyzed ENDS had a similar, although low, efficacy for quitting smoking,
the overall quality of the evidence was low60. The WHO-commissioned review reached similar conclusions
about the RCTs’ quality of evidence and efficacy.
17. Longitudinal studies are more abundant and better reflect “real world” conditions of use than RCTs,
but present more methodological concerns. Two reviews of these studies suggest that the use of ENDS may reduce the chances of quitting smoking61,4 .
However, the evidence is of very low certainty. Although most longitudinal studies found no cessation benefit or a diminished cessation benefit associated with use of ENDS,
a few studies62,63 found that the use of third generation ENDS under specific conditions of frequency of use may have cessation benefits.
This needs to be further explored before reaching any final conclusions.
In summary, given the scarcity and low quality of scientific evidence, it cannot be determined whether ENDS may help most smokers to quit or prevent them from doing so.
英文原文連結：
http://www.who.int/fctc/cop/cop7/FCTC_COP_7_11_EN.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
中文簡易報告連結：
http://www.who.int/fctc/mediacentre/media-briefings/m-b-ENDS-ENNDS-zh.pdf?ua=1
最後,今年（2017）這麼多對於Vaping正面的文獻報告，現在只能先撐著別被毀掉，
剩下就看2018年的 WHO FCTC會議怎麼說電子煙了。
下台一鞠躬
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.238.37
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/VAPE/M.1504623132.A.85A.html
推
09/06 13:53, , 1F
09/06 13:53, 1F
推
09/06 16:08, , 2F
09/06 16:08, 2F
→
09/06 16:08, , 3F
09/06 16:08, 3F
推
09/07 11:42, , 4F
09/07 11:42, 4F
推
09/08 19:26, , 5F
09/08 19:26, 5F