[討論] 這樣是誰錯阿?
最近再旁邊多了個三圍滿有防兵的廢村
只有兩個貴族的我就打過去了
~ 第一波 ~
Luck (from attacker's point of view)
-21.7% ....衰
Morale: 100%
Attacker: wang761107
Village: w.a.r-king (692|264) K26
Quantity: 347 547 8000 0 2500 0 200 0 1
Losses: 140 221 3230 0 1009 0 81 0 0
Defender: unknown
Village: racist (693|263) K26
Quantity: 2199 3296 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Losses: 2199 3296 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Haul: 59.015 59.015 59.015 177045/177045
Damage by rams: The wall has been damaged and downgraded from level 20 to level 6
Change of Loyalty Loyalty loss from 100 to 65
~ 第二波 ~
he attacker has won
Luck (from attacker's point of view)
-9.3%
Morale: 100%
Attacker: wang761107
Village: w.a.r-king (692|264) K26
Quantity: 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 1
Losses: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Defender: unknown
Village: wang 8 (693|263) K26
Quantity: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Losses: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Haul: 363 363 364 1090/1090
Change of Loyalty Loyalty loss from 65 to 30
兩次都運氣不好但是忠誠都降35^^
就在兩波回來的路上(一格...半小時距離)
就在另一邊的同盟竟然把他打下來...(一樣半小時距離)
都損失了近60萬資源卻看到這樣 (懷疑他也是有support少量兵)
就火了
管他三七二十一
等兵回來後就全部轟過去!
想說大不了說不小心的賠隻貴族
結果...
~第三波~
The attacker has won
Luck (from attacker's point of view)
6.9%
Morale: 100%
Attacker: wang761107
Village: w.a.r-king (692|264) K26
Quantity: 405 326 4813 0 1514 0 119 0 1
Losses: 88 71 1047 0 329 0 26 0 0
Defender: Odino78
Village: wang 8 (693|263) K26
Quantity: 1884 255 2806 563 1 512 13 16 0
Losses: 1884 255 2806 563 1 512 13 16 0
Defender's troops, that were in transit
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Haul: 0/144210
Damage by rams: The wall has been damaged and downgraded from level 7 to level 0
Change of Loyalty Loyalty loss from 26 to -7
這種情形我需要賠他其他兵嗎...
我是覺得自己損失很大
竟然在貴族回程路上被陰走...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.240.7
→
03/08 08:22, , 1F
03/08 08:22, 1F
→
03/08 08:26, , 2F
03/08 08:26, 2F
推
03/08 08:50, , 3F
03/08 08:50, 3F
推
03/08 08:59, , 4F
03/08 08:59, 4F
→
03/08 09:20, , 5F
03/08 09:20, 5F
→
03/08 09:20, , 6F
03/08 09:20, 6F
推
03/08 09:55, , 7F
03/08 09:55, 7F
推
03/08 10:37, , 8F
03/08 10:37, 8F
→
03/08 10:38, , 9F
03/08 10:38, 9F
→
03/08 10:38, , 10F
03/08 10:38, 10F
→
03/08 10:39, , 11F
03/08 10:39, 11F
推
03/08 12:39, , 12F
03/08 12:39, 12F
推
03/08 16:39, , 13F
03/08 16:39, 13F
→
03/08 16:40, , 14F
03/08 16:40, 14F
推
03/08 17:00, , 15F
03/08 17:00, 15F
→
03/08 17:31, , 16F
03/08 17:31, 16F
推
03/08 18:34, , 17F
03/08 18:34, 17F
推
03/08 18:51, , 18F
03/08 18:51, 18F
推
03/08 19:46, , 19F
03/08 19:46, 19F
推
03/08 20:38, , 20F
03/08 20:38, 20F
推
03/08 21:11, , 21F
03/08 21:11, 21F
→
03/08 22:28, , 22F
03/08 22:28, 22F
推
03/09 00:13, , 23F
03/09 00:13, 23F