an old professor's confusion

看板TigerBlue作者 (I love 馬刺)時間18年前 (2006/06/23 22:30), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
An Old Professor's Confusion Here comes a situation: A 60-year-old professor teaching philosophy at an academy recently finds out that most of the papers produced by his dear fellow students are impressively well-structured and organized. The papers were not only written professionally, but also gave lots of insights to the philosophy argument taught in the class. Besides, some students even came up with outstanding conclusions that are excellent enough to surprise the old professor. Unaware of the power of Google search, the professor didn't discover a crucial fact that his students did an active search on google, and patched up the work intended for the class by copying other professors' ideas found on the net. Even worse, some students borrowed the conclusion worked out by the experts in the field and made believe that those ideas are disguisedly their own. How can we help the professor to identify which one is authentically produced by his students, not the one copied from google search, in order to serve the real purpose of philosophy homework? 碰到這種事情那還不容易 就提出獎賞只要有人檢舉就給予高分優惠 妳給我抓到一個 學期莫加十分 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 不然就叫google關掉 管他去死 把學校宿舍網路鎖住 學中國大陸 大家都不給用 看誰倒楣 哈哈 XD 以上虎濫 以下是小弟想的解決方式 One of the best solutions is to build a check system, including three steps: First, request the students to list key words, main ideas and summaries of their papers. Second, identify some of them by random as their own through google search as well. Third, once being a suspect, a complete self-checking process is necessary before handing over every assignment. Otherwise, the other way is to develop a great amount of database in the professor’s computer. Google desktop is very convenient to check if there is any copy or partly copy from others. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.167.192.32

07/06 22:12, , 1F
辛苦你了 咕狗大神
07/06 22:12, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #14c_iBg8 (TigerBlue)