[測試] 已刪文

看板Test作者 (冥狗)時間3年前 (2022/05/03 13:21), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4474/7455 (看更多)
Curry:如果是別人那樣去犯規會是1級還是2級? I don’t know what the explanation was,” Curry said. “It really doesn’t matte r in terms of how we feel about it. But [the] good thing about what we do, and h opefully what Draymond can do, is just put it behind him. Continue to be himself , play his game, impact the game like he knows how to do. Curry:我不知道他們如何看待那次犯規,但我們的觀點似乎一點都不重要。我們所能做好 的是,希望Green把這件事拋諸腦後,繼續做他自己打比賽,照他的方式影響比賽。 Looking back at the play, many Warriors fans -- and even NBA players like Damian Lillard and Trae Young -- believed the ejection wasn’t warranted and only asse ssed because it was Green committing the foul. 回頭看那個回合,包括Lillard、Trae Young都相信不應該那樣吹罰,只因為他是Green,所 以裁判才吹罰二級惡犯。 Curry seemed to agree. “We’ll never know, but if someone else does that exact same foul -- is it a [F lagrant 1]? Is it a [Flagrant 2]? Whatever it is,” he said. “That’s the mind games you can play with yourself. Curry:我們永遠都不會知道,如果是別人這樣去犯規,那會是一級惡意犯規嗎?是二級嗎 ?不管那會是什麼,你可以自己去想想。 “Because it’s him, because of just the way he plays the game can influence the way you read a call. That’s the unfortunate part.” 只因為那是他,因為他的打球方式可以影響你做出判罰的方式。這就是不幸的地方。 https://pse.is/437had -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.136.149.199 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Test/M.1651555294.A.D05.html
文章代碼(AID): #1YSBlUq5 (Test)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4474 之 7455 篇):
測試
7小時前, 01/13
測試
1天前, 01/12
測試
2天前, 01/11
測試
4天前, 01/09
測試
1周前, 01/06
測試
1
2
1周前, 01/05
測試
1周前, 01/04
測試
1周前, 01/03
測試
測試
1周前, 01/02
文章代碼(AID): #1YSBlUq5 (Test)