[測試]
跳遠買飯的判罰標準，NBA裁判在推特做出解釋
(1/5) We’ve received lots of questions about these types of “pump and draw
” plays. The next series of tweets will explain the interpretation and how
these plays are adjudicated during games.
我們收到了很多關於假動作之後製造犯規的質疑，接下來的一系列推文我們將解釋和展
示這些吹罰是怎麼判出來的。
(2/5) First, let’s focus on the defender. Notice how Andrew leaves his feet
and is moving towards Luka. Any time a defender leaves his feet and jumps f
rom A to B TOWARDS a shooter, he is at risk of committing a foul. This type
of movement by a defender is illegal.
http://i.imgur.com/KUaPU0b.jpg
首先我們注意看防守的人(Wiggins)，他的雙腳離開了地面、跳向了Luka。任何時候，只
要是防守者的雙腳離開地面、朝著投籃人從A點跳向B點，他就會處在犯規的危險之中，
這種動作對於防守的人來說是違規的。
(3/5) Now let’s take a look at what Luka does. While Luka does clearly jump
towards Andrew to ensure contact is made, it is not illegal for a shooter t
o jump directly towards the rim, as Luka is doing here.
http://i.imgur.com/ZOD6Y5i.jpg
現在讓我們看看Luka做了什麼，Luka明顯跳向了Wiggins，以確保兩人的碰撞能夠發生。
投籃人朝著籃框的方向跳，是不違反規規的，就像Luka在這裡做的那樣。
(4/5) With Andrew in an ILLEGAL position, and Luka using a LEGAL basketball
move, when they make contact the onus is on the defender and the contact is
correctly deemed a defensive foul.
http://i.imgur.com/8NGRkXW.jpg
由於Wiggins處於一個非法的位置，而Luka使用了一個合法的籃球動作，當他們接觸到對
方時，責任在防守者身上，這種接觸被正確地視為防守犯規。
(5/5) Finally, Andrew getting a foot back to the floor does not absolve him
of his illegal movement. His momentum is still taking him forward when the c
ontact occurs, and this is still considered an illegal position by a defende
r.
http://i.imgur.com/CNbzwtZ.jpg
最後，雖然Wiggins有收斂的動作，但是慣性仍然帶著他向前，這依然被認定為防守人侵
佔了空間。
https://twitter.com/OfficialNBARefs/status/1370460527550472192?s=19
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.136.203.247 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Test/M.1615605913.A.F2B.html
討論串 (同標題文章)