[問題] 底線抽球如何才能不失誤或失誤很少??
Big 4在美網我除了Djo以外,其他都看,Nadal看最多。心中一直有個疑問,以一個底線
球員來說(其實其他type的或許也一樣),最基本的,抽球先求不失誤,再想辦法打出角度
讓對手回球變差,最後再攻擊。
我今天想討論的只是第一步驟,底線抽球不失誤~~
看到現在,Big3(Djo沒看)裡面,屬於UE(主動攻擊時發生失誤),Nadal最少。到底是什麼
原因,讓Nadal光第一步就可以做到這麼好??
我先說大家大概會說的一般部分: 專注力高,天份高+練習的很透徹。這部分也不想討論。
比較想討論的是技術部分:
大家都知道Nadal是西方式握拍(也有人說半西),上旋球是他也是這種握拍的特色,除了
閃正打對角比較偏平擊外,他的球都很旋。
問題來了,平擊失誤多(有人說Nalbandian)這可以理解,可是昨天AROD的比賽推文中有人
希望AROD可以都一點平擊,上旋讓他比較沒競爭力,在很多文章中也掉類似說法,AROD
近幾年抽球上旋變多,但也因為為了避免失誤改上旋,導致攻擊力下降不少(昨天還蠻明顯
的),一樣上旋,其他人為何對上Nadal UE就多呢??是因為Nadal抽球質量(學某
人說法)讓對手打他的球失誤變多??(對上Muller也一樣,Muller球野蠻旋的)
另外像Murray對上其他對手,UE當然少不意外,但是以防守為主的他,對上其他對手感覺
UE還是比Nadal對上其他對手時還多,是否Nadal在平常練習中,對施力VS球跑的距離已經
掌握的很好???
--
流浪在寒冬的黃昏,漫步在這大地上..
豪邁的把弓架在陳舊的小提琴弦上....
回首著曾經擁有的天荒地老...... 1701 Stradivari 一生珍藏
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 175.180.102.236
推
09/10 10:30, , 1F
09/10 10:30, 1F
推
09/10 10:32, , 2F
09/10 10:32, 2F
推
09/10 10:33, , 3F
09/10 10:33, 3F
→
09/10 10:33, , 4F
09/10 10:33, 4F
推
09/10 10:34, , 5F
09/10 10:34, 5F
→
09/10 10:35, , 6F
09/10 10:35, 6F
※ 編輯: sleeeve 來自: 175.180.102.236 (09/10 10:36)
→
09/10 10:36, , 7F
09/10 10:36, 7F
推
09/10 10:37, , 8F
09/10 10:37, 8F
→
09/10 10:38, , 9F
09/10 10:38, 9F
推
09/10 10:39, , 10F
09/10 10:39, 10F
推
09/10 10:42, , 11F
09/10 10:42, 11F
→
09/10 10:43, , 12F
09/10 10:43, 12F
推
09/10 10:47, , 13F
09/10 10:47, 13F
推
09/10 10:47, , 14F
09/10 10:47, 14F
→
09/10 10:49, , 15F
09/10 10:49, 15F
→
09/10 11:25, , 16F
09/10 11:25, 16F
→
09/10 11:26, , 17F
09/10 11:26, 17F
→
09/10 11:27, , 18F
09/10 11:27, 18F
→
09/10 11:27, , 19F
09/10 11:27, 19F
推
09/10 11:37, , 20F
09/10 11:37, 20F
推
09/10 11:54, , 21F
09/10 11:54, 21F
→
09/10 11:55, , 22F
09/10 11:55, 22F
推
09/10 11:56, , 23F
09/10 11:56, 23F
→
09/10 11:57, , 24F
09/10 11:57, 24F
推
09/10 11:59, , 25F
09/10 11:59, 25F
推
09/10 12:00, , 26F
09/10 12:00, 26F
推
09/10 12:04, , 27F
09/10 12:04, 27F
推
09/10 12:08, , 28F
09/10 12:08, 28F
推
09/10 12:51, , 29F
09/10 12:51, 29F
推
09/10 13:08, , 30F
09/10 13:08, 30F
→
09/10 13:09, , 31F
09/10 13:09, 31F
推
09/10 13:11, , 32F
09/10 13:11, 32F
推
09/10 13:14, , 33F
09/10 13:14, 33F
→
09/10 13:41, , 34F
09/10 13:41, 34F
→
09/10 13:44, , 35F
09/10 13:44, 35F
→
09/10 13:44, , 36F
09/10 13:44, 36F
推
09/10 13:56, , 37F
09/10 13:56, 37F
推
09/10 14:08, , 38F
09/10 14:08, 38F
推
09/10 14:10, , 39F
09/10 14:10, 39F
推
09/10 14:41, , 40F
09/10 14:41, 40F
→
09/10 14:42, , 41F
09/10 14:42, 41F
→
09/10 14:43, , 42F
09/10 14:43, 42F
推
09/10 14:43, , 43F
09/10 14:43, 43F
→
09/10 14:44, , 44F
09/10 14:44, 44F
→
09/10 14:45, , 45F
09/10 14:45, 45F
→
09/10 14:45, , 46F
09/10 14:45, 46F
推
09/10 14:56, , 47F
09/10 14:56, 47F
推
09/10 15:06, , 48F
09/10 15:06, 48F
推
09/10 15:11, , 49F
09/10 15:11, 49F
→
09/10 15:12, , 50F
09/10 15:12, 50F
→
09/10 15:15, , 51F
09/10 15:15, 51F
→
09/10 15:18, , 52F
09/10 15:18, 52F
推
09/10 15:23, , 53F
09/10 15:23, 53F
推
09/10 15:28, , 54F
09/10 15:28, 54F
→
09/10 15:32, , 55F
09/10 15:32, 55F
推
09/10 20:06, , 56F
09/10 20:06, 56F
→
09/10 20:08, , 57F
09/10 20:08, 57F
→
09/10 20:10, , 58F
09/10 20:10, 58F
→
09/10 20:12, , 59F
09/10 20:12, 59F
推
09/10 20:17, , 60F
09/10 20:17, 60F
推
09/10 20:37, , 61F
09/10 20:37, 61F
→
09/10 20:39, , 62F
09/10 20:39, 62F
→
09/10 21:12, , 63F
09/10 21:12, 63F
→
09/10 21:13, , 64F
09/10 21:13, 64F
→
09/10 21:15, , 65F
09/10 21:15, 65F
推
09/10 22:15, , 66F
09/10 22:15, 66F
→
09/10 22:16, , 67F
09/10 22:16, 67F