[討論] 是對Fed的標準比較奇特 還是太過悲觀? 亦或者這就是現實?
今天這場決賽五盤大戰
說Fed打的好嘛,也沒有(發球鳥爆)
說打的差嘛,也不算(面對納豆,反拍竟然回神了..)
誰都看的出來這場比賽對Fed的重要性
不僅是要挑戰追平生涯第14個大滿貫,成為史上最佳球員
他在賽前也說了,如果能在今晚擊敗納豆
那會是對他信心的一種很大的建設
也會讓他覺得自己還有機會在法網奪冠
他已經27歲了,真的是剩沒幾年
嗯,或許很多人說的沒錯
在法網贏不了的情況下,連自己拿手的澳網和溫布頓都丟了
正值巔峰的納豆的確成為了27歲的Fed一道難以跨越的高牆
其實輸給別人倒還無所謂
但納豆現在是如日中天的真正球王
四大滿貫他已有能力奪其三
將來Fed要再想拿下任何一座大滿貫都勢必會遭遇到他的嚴峻考驗
嗯,這樣看起來的確是很悲觀
可是很多人是不是也忘記了
這個被認為日暮西山,走下坡、退化、無法再奪下一座大滿貫的人
在狀況最差的去年四大滿貫,取得了1次四強、2亞1冠的成績
而剛剛他輸掉的那場,也是硬生生打了五盤才落敗的澳網冠軍戰
他的狀況勝過去年,美網至今也還是連霸者
說一個擁有這樣表現的世界第二再也拿不到大滿貫會不會誇張了點?
普天之下只怕再也沒有一個世界第二會被講得如此不堪
而這個世界第二還可能在生涯結束後被認為是史上最佳的球員..
就算納豆從今以後的大滿貫都一定能殺入決賽,也不代表Fed就一定會輸吧(倒)
去年Djo澳網先是橫掃Fed,再轟掉松尬
很多人也說他的時代來了...結果呢-.-
一些太過肯定或樂觀悲觀的預測都是沒意義的
乖乖看球吧...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.6.149
推
02/02 01:13, , 1F
02/02 01:13, 1F
推
02/02 01:13, , 2F
02/02 01:13, 2F
→
02/02 01:13, , 3F
02/02 01:13, 3F
推
02/02 01:14, , 4F
02/02 01:14, 4F
→
02/02 01:14, , 5F
02/02 01:14, 5F
推
02/02 01:14, , 6F
02/02 01:14, 6F
→
02/02 01:15, , 7F
02/02 01:15, 7F
→
02/02 01:15, , 8F
02/02 01:15, 8F
→
02/02 01:16, , 9F
02/02 01:16, 9F
→
02/02 01:16, , 10F
02/02 01:16, 10F
→
02/02 01:16, , 11F
02/02 01:16, 11F
→
02/02 01:16, , 12F
02/02 01:16, 12F
→
02/02 01:17, , 13F
02/02 01:17, 13F
推
02/02 01:17, , 14F
02/02 01:17, 14F
→
02/02 01:17, , 15F
02/02 01:17, 15F
推
02/02 01:17, , 16F
02/02 01:17, 16F
→
02/02 01:18, , 17F
02/02 01:18, 17F
推
02/02 01:18, , 18F
02/02 01:18, 18F
→
02/02 01:19, , 19F
02/02 01:19, 19F
推
02/02 01:20, , 20F
02/02 01:20, 20F
推
02/02 01:20, , 21F
02/02 01:20, 21F
→
02/02 01:20, , 22F
02/02 01:20, 22F
→
02/02 01:21, , 23F
02/02 01:21, 23F
推
02/02 01:21, , 24F
02/02 01:21, 24F
→
02/02 01:22, , 25F
02/02 01:22, 25F
→
02/02 01:22, , 26F
02/02 01:22, 26F
推
02/02 01:22, , 27F
02/02 01:22, 27F
→
02/02 01:22, , 28F
02/02 01:22, 28F
→
02/02 01:23, , 29F
02/02 01:23, 29F
→
02/02 01:23, , 30F
02/02 01:23, 30F
推
02/02 01:23, , 31F
02/02 01:23, 31F
→
02/02 01:23, , 32F
02/02 01:23, 32F
推
02/02 01:23, , 33F
02/02 01:23, 33F
→
02/02 01:24, , 34F
02/02 01:24, 34F
→
02/02 01:24, , 35F
02/02 01:24, 35F
→
02/02 01:25, , 36F
02/02 01:25, 36F
→
02/02 01:25, , 37F
02/02 01:25, 37F
→
02/02 01:26, , 38F
02/02 01:26, 38F
推
02/02 01:26, , 39F
02/02 01:26, 39F
→
02/02 01:27, , 40F
02/02 01:27, 40F
→
02/02 01:27, , 41F
02/02 01:27, 41F
推
02/02 01:27, , 42F
02/02 01:27, 42F
→
02/02 01:28, , 43F
02/02 01:28, 43F
→
02/02 01:28, , 44F
02/02 01:28, 44F
→
02/02 01:28, , 45F
02/02 01:28, 45F
推
02/02 01:29, , 46F
02/02 01:29, 46F
→
02/02 01:30, , 47F
02/02 01:30, 47F
→
02/02 01:30, , 48F
02/02 01:30, 48F
→
02/02 01:30, , 49F
02/02 01:30, 49F
→
02/02 01:31, , 50F
02/02 01:31, 50F
推
02/02 01:32, , 51F
02/02 01:32, 51F
推
02/02 01:33, , 52F
02/02 01:33, 52F
→
02/02 01:33, , 53F
02/02 01:33, 53F
→
02/02 01:33, , 54F
02/02 01:33, 54F
推
02/02 01:34, , 55F
02/02 01:34, 55F
推
02/02 01:48, , 56F
02/02 01:48, 56F
推
02/02 01:55, , 57F
02/02 01:55, 57F
推
02/02 02:01, , 58F
02/02 02:01, 58F
推
02/02 02:10, , 59F
02/02 02:10, 59F
推
02/02 02:12, , 60F
02/02 02:12, 60F
推
02/02 02:23, , 61F
02/02 02:23, 61F
→
02/02 02:24, , 62F
02/02 02:24, 62F
→
02/02 02:25, , 63F
02/02 02:25, 63F
推
02/02 02:26, , 64F
02/02 02:26, 64F
推
02/02 02:48, , 65F
02/02 02:48, 65F
推
02/02 03:02, , 66F
02/02 03:02, 66F
→
02/02 06:16, , 67F
02/02 06:16, 67F
推
02/02 09:23, , 68F
02/02 09:23, 68F
→
02/02 09:24, , 69F
02/02 09:24, 69F
推
02/02 13:28, , 70F
02/02 13:28, 70F
→
02/02 13:28, , 71F
02/02 13:28, 71F
推
02/02 20:53, , 72F
02/02 20:53, 72F
→
02/02 20:54, , 73F
02/02 20:54, 73F
→
02/02 20:55, , 74F
02/02 20:55, 74F
→
02/02 20:56, , 75F
02/02 20:56, 75F
→
02/02 20:57, , 76F
02/02 20:57, 76F
→
02/02 20:58, , 77F
02/02 20:58, 77F
→
02/02 22:09, , 78F
02/02 22:09, 78F