[情報] Nadal Clinches Year-End No.1 4 1st time

看板Tennis作者 (Smallju就是我)時間15年前 (2008/10/19 15:27), 編輯推噓24(24041)
留言65則, 11人參與, 最新討論串1/1
原文:http://www.atptennis.com/1/en/2008news/nadalno1.asp 大意是: 豆豆確定成為年終球王(在當了160週的第二名後) 史上第三位左手持拍球王 也是第15位曾登上年終球王的 同時更是西班牙籍第一位年終球王 後面提了一些今年的戰績: 1980年繼Borg以後首位連拿法網溫網的選手 夏季32連勝(今年截至目前為止80+勝10敗) 2座大滿貫 3+座AMS(共12座) 1座奧運男單金牌 NADAL CLINCHES YEAR-END No. 1 Madrid, Spain October 18, 2008 Nadal Clinches Year-End No. 1 For First Time Spaniard Rafael Nadal is guaranteed to finish this season as the No. 1 player in the South African Airways ATP Rankings, ending Roger Federer's four-year reign. After Federer’s semifinal loss to Andy Murray in the Mutua Madrilena Masters Madrid semifinals on Saturday, Nadal is guaranteed to claim the No. 1 year-end position. The 22-year-old Mallorca native is the first left-hander to finish No. 1 since John McEnroe in 1984 and the third lefty in the 36-year history of the ATP Rankings. McEnroe was No. 1 from 1981-84 and Jimmy Connors finished No. 1 from 1974-78. Nadal is the 15th different year-end No. 1 and the first Spaniard to finish the season as the top player in the world. Prior to this season Nadal finished No. 2 the past three years. Nadal took over No. 1 on August 18 after ranking No. 2 for a record 160 consecutive weeks (since July 25, 2005). Federer held the top position for a record 237 straight weeks from Feb. 2, 2004 to Aug. 17, 2008. Nadal said: "To become No. 1 during the year was one of my goals and it is important to have achieved it. Moreover, if you finish the year as No. 1 it is even more special. I am also very happy to bring something more to Spanish sport, something for Spanish history and for our great tennis tradition." Rafa's Detailed 2008 Match Record Nadal leads the ATP circuit with eight titles and an 80-10 match record in 2008. In July, he became the first man since Bjorn Borg in 1980 to win the Roland Garros and Wimbledon double after dethroning five-time champion Federer in a five-set epic at the All England Club. Nadal followed by clinching his 12th career ATP Masters Series title, and third of the season, at the Rogers Cup in Toronto. He won 32 consecutive matches before falling to World No. 3 Novak Djokovic in the Cincinnati semifinals. He also won a gold medal in singles at the Beijing Olympics. Nadal is one of four players to have so far qualified for the circuit-ending Tennis Masters Cup Shanghai, beginning November 9. Federer, Djokovic and Murray are the other qualifiers. Four singles berths remain up for grabs with just over two weeks of the regular ATP season to play. 恭喜納豆 在努力了4年後 ※ 編輯: Joego 來自: 122.116.169.144 (10/19 15:29)

10/19 16:22, , 1F
可喜可賀... 堅持了這麼久終於阿.
10/19 16:22, 1F

10/19 18:22, , 2F
這樣Sampras的年終球王六連霸短期內不會有人挑戰了
10/19 18:22, 2F

10/19 18:26, , 3F
雖然年數不及 但似乎Federer在這四年內的統治性是更強的
10/19 18:26, 3F

10/19 18:53, , 4F
同意樓上,那幾年幾乎是天下無敵。不過也可能是因為對手
10/19 18:53, 4F

10/19 18:54, , 5F
夠強,老的老,小的小,不穩的不穩(沙皇),跟他年齡較
10/19 18:54, 5F

10/19 18:54, , 6F
接近的才華不夠。
10/19 18:54, 6F

10/19 18:54, , 7F
Sampras在93年溫布頓到94年羅馬紅土,96年美網到97年辛辛那提
10/19 18:54, 7F

10/19 18:55, , 8F
對啊 雖然我很不服氣 但是一年三座大滿貫 真的很威
10/19 18:55, 8F

10/19 18:55, , 9F
95年一整年的強度也是很高,別低估了
10/19 18:55, 9F

10/19 18:55, , 10F
我還是很看好FEDERER 在2年內突破山大王的紀錄
10/19 18:55, 10F

10/19 18:57, , 11F
不穩的還有劇場天王
10/19 18:57, 11F

10/19 19:00, , 12F
97年要不是Korda擋路,之後又連拿下巴黎,大滿貫杯跟年終賽冠軍
10/19 19:00, 12F

10/19 19:24, , 13F
我沒有要低估的意思 我只是覺得F這個連續四年幾乎沒有低檔
10/19 19:24, 13F

10/19 19:25, , 14F
山大王的豐功偉業豈是我能低估的?
10/19 19:25, 14F

10/19 19:27, , 15F
當一個選手獨霸的時候,就被說對手強度不夠,這對同時代
10/19 19:27, 15F

10/19 19:28, , 16F
的選手而言,真是一件很無奈的事 ...
10/19 19:28, 16F

10/19 19:29, , 17F
要獨霸ATP 4年,付出的努力真的是很難想像的巨大 ~
10/19 19:29, 17F

10/19 19:39, , 18F
還有保分的壓力 那可真的不簡單~
10/19 19:39, 18F

10/19 20:02, , 19F
山大王那時候的對手有阿格西,庫瑞爾。費神有.......?
10/19 20:02, 19F

10/19 20:03, , 20F
有Nadal XD. 另外其實Courier對Sampras戰績很慘烈
10/19 20:03, 20F

10/19 20:11, , 21F
Federer同期的球王有Safin,Hewwit,Roddick,乃至後期的
10/19 20:11, 21F

10/19 20:12, , 22F
新球王Nadal,所以君的意思是這些人都不成熟,不夠與你說
10/19 20:12, 22F

10/19 20:13, , 23F
的那些人匹配囉?這樣是不是太武斷了呢?
10/19 20:13, 23F

10/19 20:16, , 24F
Hewwit好歹也是80周球王~最年輕球王~生涯前期根本把費打
10/19 20:16, 24F

10/19 20:16, , 25F
假的~納班也是啊
10/19 20:16, 25F

10/19 21:08, , 26F
老張早期也是把阿山哥打假的
10/19 21:08, 26F

10/19 21:10, , 27F
Courier正拍很強大,但反拍跟截擊弱.跟06年前的Roddick像
10/19 21:10, 27F

10/19 21:11, , 28F
兩人在弱點暴露後被球王吃這點也有像到
10/19 21:11, 28F

10/19 21:52, , 29F
我想C君純論稱霸期吧 以F大這四年來看 LH AR的對戰很慘
10/19 21:52, 29F

10/19 21:54, , 30F
不過講這些都無損於目前PS還是六連霸年終球王紀錄的事實
10/19 21:54, 30F

10/19 21:55, , 31F
Safin常輸給不該輸的人,Hewwit跟張有點像,至於Roddick...
10/19 21:55, 31F

10/19 21:56, , 32F
雖然我蠻喜歡他的,但是他真的離那些人還有些距離
10/19 21:56, 32F

10/19 21:58, , 33F
而且我之前已經說了,是也許,不是絕對。
10/19 21:58, 33F

10/19 22:13, , 34F
Pete的紀錄很偉大啊,講這些只是不希望其他球員的努力
10/19 22:13, 34F

10/19 22:13, , 35F
被忽視而已。
10/19 22:13, 35F

10/19 22:17, , 36F
是也許或是絕對,或者等Rogi生涯結束再來論定吧~
10/19 22:17, 36F

10/19 22:25, , 37F
可能我中文差了些,不太懂你的重點是什麼。不過,基本上拿
10/19 22:25, 37F

10/19 22:26, , 38F
不同時期的人來做比較是很詭異的事。長江後浪推前浪,不管
10/19 22:26, 38F

10/19 22:27, , 39F
前期的人再怎麼強,他們總要謝幕。這不是因為他們打不好,
10/19 22:27, 39F

10/19 22:28, , 40F
而是因為在運動競賽中,體力佔了一個很重要的因素。
10/19 22:28, 40F

10/19 22:34, , 41F
所以要如何把不同時期的球員做比賽,然後得到一個結論,某
10/19 22:34, 41F

10/19 22:35, , 42F
時期的球員比不上某時期的球員,這實在太難取信於人。
10/19 22:35, 42F

10/19 22:51, , 43F
抱歉喔!我還是認為其實是可以的。但是我也說了是也許不是
10/19 22:51, 43F

10/19 22:51, , 44F
絕對。
10/19 22:51, 44F

10/19 22:53, , 45F
成就可以比較 但是實力的話應該沒有那個基準點讓你比
10/19 22:53, 45F

10/19 22:54, , 46F
過去的人很偉大,但那是屬於那個時代的偉大,去看看二十年
10/19 22:54, 46F

10/19 22:54, , 47F
10/19 22:54, 47F

10/19 22:55, , 48F
前那些選手打網球的影片,真的可以打贏現在的選手嗎?
10/19 22:55, 48F

10/19 22:55, , 49F
人的身體素質本來就會越來越好,技術戰術也會越發展越多。
10/19 22:55, 49F

10/19 22:55, , 50F
當然阿 但是你覺得那公平嗎?訓練的差別 球拍的差別
10/19 22:55, 50F

10/19 22:55, , 51F
這樣比較未免太不公平了,訓練環境球拍科技都不一樣 ...
10/19 22:55, 51F

10/19 22:56, , 52F
那種比較是沒意義的 真正有意義的是成就上的比較
10/19 22:56, 52F

10/19 22:57, , 53F
按照這個邏輯,現在的球員用木拍用過去的訓練
10/19 22:57, 53F

10/19 22:57, , 54F
打得贏過去的選手嗎?不同時空背景很難比較的 ...
10/19 22:57, 54F

10/19 22:58, , 55F
齊頭式平等嗎???立足點平等的比較才有意義是不是啊?
10/19 22:58, 55F

10/19 23:00, , 56F
也許就是"也許",才有可以討論的空間吧!!
10/19 23:00, 56F

10/19 23:01, , 57F
這種討論是討論不出結果的吧.......
10/19 23:01, 57F

10/19 23:02, , 58F
可是這樣很沒有科學實證的精神!
10/19 23:02, 58F

10/19 23:03, , 59F
看有沒有誰有興趣以這個假設為前提,發展出一篇論文究,
10/19 23:03, 59F

10/19 23:04, , 60F
也許會很有價值喔!
10/19 23:04, 60F

10/19 23:05, , 61F
這個要怎麼實驗啊?= =...
10/19 23:05, 61F

10/19 23:09, , 62F
質性研究,發問卷還是訪談,如何?
10/19 23:09, 62F

10/19 23:11, , 63F
要先弄一台時光機才行~XDDDDDD
10/19 23:11, 63F

10/19 23:25, , 64F
Laver跟Federer到底誰強呢?
10/19 23:25, 64F

10/20 09:44, , 65F
10/20 09:44, 65F
文章代碼(AID): #18-k5vVY (Tennis)