[請益] 科技業副理職缺offer vs 海關
如題,想聽聽版友的看法,謝謝.
單位 design house A vs 海關
職位 產品專案副理 辦事員
產業 網通IC
年薪 (N+27)*14+? (43200)*14+輪班津貼
33歲了,目前在基隆關當海關,本來是想繼續念書準備考三等
但因緣際會,目前有一間design house(恕我不講公司名稱,講了就很容易認..)
開了一個專案副理的缺給我,公司近幾年不賺錢,但也不會倒,目前面試還沒走完,
後面還有聯發科的面試跟義隆電二輪面談...只是這間公司需回復
而目前須提離職的時間點了,想聽聽版友看法,謝謝.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.34.196
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1504322916.A.E7F.html
※ 編輯: aoaay (223.137.34.196), 09/02/2017 11:30:00
推
09/02 11:30, , 1F
09/02 11:30, 1F
推
09/02 11:31, , 2F
09/02 11:31, 2F
推
09/02 11:33, , 3F
09/02 11:33, 3F
推
09/02 11:33, , 4F
09/02 11:33, 4F
→
09/02 11:34, , 5F
09/02 11:34, 5F
推
09/02 11:36, , 6F
09/02 11:36, 6F
推
09/02 11:37, , 7F
09/02 11:37, 7F
→
09/02 11:37, , 8F
09/02 11:37, 8F
→
09/02 11:37, , 9F
09/02 11:37, 9F
推
09/02 11:38, , 10F
09/02 11:38, 10F
→
09/02 11:39, , 11F
09/02 11:39, 11F
→
09/02 11:39, , 12F
09/02 11:39, 12F
→
09/02 11:39, , 13F
09/02 11:39, 13F
→
09/02 11:40, , 14F
09/02 11:40, 14F
→
09/02 11:40, , 15F
09/02 11:40, 15F
→
09/02 11:40, , 16F
09/02 11:40, 16F
推
09/02 11:40, , 17F
09/02 11:40, 17F
推
09/02 11:41, , 18F
09/02 11:41, 18F
推
09/02 11:41, , 19F
09/02 11:41, 19F
→
09/02 11:41, , 20F
09/02 11:41, 20F
推
09/02 11:42, , 21F
09/02 11:42, 21F
→
09/02 11:43, , 22F
09/02 11:43, 22F
推
09/02 11:43, , 23F
09/02 11:43, 23F
推
09/02 11:43, , 24F
09/02 11:43, 24F
→
09/02 11:44, , 25F
09/02 11:44, 25F
→
09/02 11:44, , 26F
09/02 11:44, 26F
→
09/02 11:44, , 27F
09/02 11:44, 27F
推
09/02 11:47, , 28F
09/02 11:47, 28F
推
09/02 11:48, , 29F
09/02 11:48, 29F
推
09/02 11:49, , 30F
09/02 11:49, 30F
推
09/02 11:51, , 31F
09/02 11:51, 31F
→
09/02 11:53, , 32F
09/02 11:53, 32F
→
09/02 11:53, , 33F
09/02 11:53, 33F
推
09/02 11:54, , 34F
09/02 11:54, 34F
→
09/02 11:54, , 35F
09/02 11:54, 35F
→
09/02 11:55, , 36F
09/02 11:55, 36F
推
09/02 12:01, , 37F
09/02 12:01, 37F
→
09/02 12:02, , 38F
09/02 12:02, 38F
→
09/02 12:02, , 39F
09/02 12:02, 39F
還有 44 則推文
→
09/02 17:04, , 84F
09/02 17:04, 84F
推
09/02 17:44, , 85F
09/02 17:44, 85F
推
09/02 18:09, , 86F
09/02 18:09, 86F
→
09/02 18:18, , 87F
09/02 18:18, 87F
噓
09/02 18:24, , 88F
09/02 18:24, 88F
→
09/02 18:41, , 89F
09/02 18:41, 89F
推
09/02 18:43, , 90F
09/02 18:43, 90F
→
09/02 19:05, , 91F
09/02 19:05, 91F
→
09/02 19:09, , 92F
09/02 19:09, 92F
推
09/02 19:42, , 93F
09/02 19:42, 93F
→
09/02 19:50, , 94F
09/02 19:50, 94F
推
09/02 19:51, , 95F
09/02 19:51, 95F
推
09/02 20:03, , 96F
09/02 20:03, 96F
推
09/02 20:24, , 97F
09/02 20:24, 97F
噓
09/02 20:45, , 98F
09/02 20:45, 98F
推
09/02 21:05, , 99F
09/02 21:05, 99F
→
09/02 21:05, , 100F
09/02 21:05, 100F
推
09/03 00:35, , 101F
09/03 00:35, 101F
→
09/03 00:35, , 102F
09/03 00:35, 102F
→
09/03 02:00, , 103F
09/03 02:00, 103F
推
09/03 02:02, , 104F
09/03 02:02, 104F
推
09/03 09:48, , 105F
09/03 09:48, 105F
推
09/03 10:29, , 106F
09/03 10:29, 106F
→
09/03 10:30, , 107F
09/03 10:30, 107F
推
09/03 13:33, , 108F
09/03 13:33, 108F
推
09/03 21:31, , 109F
09/03 21:31, 109F
推
09/03 22:20, , 110F
09/03 22:20, 110F
→
09/03 22:20, , 111F
09/03 22:20, 111F
→
09/03 22:21, , 112F
09/03 22:21, 112F
→
09/03 22:22, , 113F
09/03 22:22, 113F
→
09/03 22:22, , 114F
09/03 22:22, 114F
推
09/04 08:47, , 115F
09/04 08:47, 115F
噓
09/04 09:11, , 116F
09/04 09:11, 116F
推
09/04 09:37, , 117F
09/04 09:37, 117F
推
09/04 11:50, , 118F
09/04 11:50, 118F
→
09/04 11:51, , 119F
09/04 11:51, 119F
→
09/04 11:52, , 120F
09/04 11:52, 120F
→
09/04 11:54, , 121F
09/04 11:54, 121F
→
09/04 11:54, , 122F
09/04 11:54, 122F
推
09/04 12:40, , 123F
09/04 12:40, 123F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):