[討論]待遇=N基本上等於沒寫,薪水透明化不好嗎?
我知道長久以來大家的習慣都是將面試公司的薪水待遇寫N,也就任意數。
但不解的是,這樣做有甚麼意義嗎? 除了保護面試公司的薪資水平不外洩外,
也給了讓人無從比較的感覺。
我覺得直接將薪資水平公開後,對即將面試的人大約應該開多少也比較有個底。
現在的薪資水平的低落,一部份造成的原因也許是過於保護公司的薪資狀況的緣故。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.68.36.62
推
09/19 10:30, , 1F
09/19 10:30, 1F
→
09/19 10:31, , 2F
09/19 10:31, 2F
推
09/19 10:41, , 3F
09/19 10:41, 3F
推
09/19 10:51, , 4F
09/19 10:51, 4F
→
09/19 10:56, , 5F
09/19 10:56, 5F
推
09/19 10:58, , 6F
09/19 10:58, 6F
→
09/19 11:10, , 7F
09/19 11:10, 7F
→
09/19 11:11, , 8F
09/19 11:11, 8F
→
09/19 11:19, , 9F
09/19 11:19, 9F
推
09/19 11:30, , 10F
09/19 11:30, 10F
→
09/19 11:30, , 11F
09/19 11:30, 11F
推
09/19 11:54, , 12F
09/19 11:54, 12F
→
09/19 11:57, , 13F
09/19 11:57, 13F
推
09/19 12:10, , 14F
09/19 12:10, 14F
推
09/19 12:13, , 15F
09/19 12:13, 15F
→
09/19 12:31, , 16F
09/19 12:31, 16F
推
09/19 12:43, , 17F
09/19 12:43, 17F
→
09/19 12:43, , 18F
09/19 12:43, 18F
→
09/19 12:43, , 19F
09/19 12:43, 19F
→
09/19 12:47, , 20F
09/19 12:47, 20F
推
09/19 12:58, , 21F
09/19 12:58, 21F
→
09/19 13:32, , 22F
09/19 13:32, 22F
→
09/19 13:33, , 23F
09/19 13:33, 23F
推
09/19 13:35, , 24F
09/19 13:35, 24F
推
09/19 13:42, , 25F
09/19 13:42, 25F
→
09/19 13:44, , 26F
09/19 13:44, 26F
→
09/19 13:46, , 27F
09/19 13:46, 27F
→
09/19 13:48, , 28F
09/19 13:48, 28F
→
09/19 14:19, , 29F
09/19 14:19, 29F
推
09/19 14:28, , 30F
09/19 14:28, 30F
→
09/19 15:30, , 31F
09/19 15:30, 31F
公開也沒甚麼,我日商半導體FAE,年資約6年,年薪約85萬。在台北吃不飽但也餓不死。
推
09/19 15:40, , 32F
09/19 15:40, 32F
※ 編輯: shun1101 來自: 210.68.36.62 (09/19 15:46)
推
09/19 16:04, , 33F
09/19 16:04, 33F
推
09/19 16:15, , 34F
09/19 16:15, 34F
推
09/19 16:23, , 35F
09/19 16:23, 35F
推
09/19 16:27, , 36F
09/19 16:27, 36F
→
09/19 16:28, , 37F
09/19 16:28, 37F
推
09/19 18:30, , 38F
09/19 18:30, 38F
推
09/19 18:44, , 39F
09/19 18:44, 39F
→
09/19 18:44, , 40F
09/19 18:44, 40F
→
09/19 18:56, , 41F
09/19 18:56, 41F
推
09/19 19:04, , 42F
09/19 19:04, 42F
推
09/19 19:27, , 43F
09/19 19:27, 43F
→
09/19 20:09, , 44F
09/19 20:09, 44F
→
09/19 20:18, , 45F
09/19 20:18, 45F
推
09/19 20:30, , 46F
09/19 20:30, 46F
推
09/19 21:07, , 47F
09/19 21:07, 47F
→
09/19 21:08, , 48F
09/19 21:08, 48F
→
09/19 21:25, , 49F
09/19 21:25, 49F
→
09/19 21:30, , 50F
09/19 21:30, 50F
推
09/19 21:43, , 51F
09/19 21:43, 51F
推
09/19 21:49, , 52F
09/19 21:49, 52F
推
09/19 23:00, , 53F
09/19 23:00, 53F
推
09/20 00:05, , 54F
09/20 00:05, 54F
噓
09/20 00:28, , 55F
09/20 00:28, 55F
→
09/20 00:28, , 56F
09/20 00:28, 56F
推
09/20 00:59, , 57F
09/20 00:59, 57F
→
09/20 02:19, , 58F
09/20 02:19, 58F
→
09/20 08:28, , 59F
09/20 08:28, 59F
→
09/20 08:29, , 60F
09/20 08:29, 60F
推
09/20 12:33, , 61F
09/20 12:33, 61F
推
09/20 13:05, , 62F
09/20 13:05, 62F
→
09/20 21:42, , 63F
09/20 21:42, 63F
噓
09/20 22:03, , 64F
09/20 22:03, 64F
噓
09/21 16:58, , 65F
09/21 16:58, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):