[請益] 大減班造成後母班不該處理嗎?
今年高雄市大減班,據我所知本校很多導師準備離開
這樣很多人要去接後母班
教育局這樣讓人無法安心教學,想留的被超走
沒被超額的要當後母班導師
萬一後母導師明年又被抄走
一個班換三任導師很好嗎?
為何不速降班級人數,教育局不需煩惱超額、不必產生後母班
又可以開教甄讓教師流動
為何要搞得國中教育像一攤死水
然後市內介聘越來越難調
這不是真正教育吧
為何不比照國小非總量管制學校降低班級人數呢
為了省錢這樣好嗎
一堆閒置教室要養蚊子嗎?
高雄市這幾年國中還開了好幾百個教甄缺
現在來煩惱超額不覺得可笑嗎
有小孩的老師想調家近點也不可得
可不可以好好思考教育政策啊?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.172.226.170
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Teacher/M.1429273227.A.703.html
推
04/17 20:30, , 1F
04/17 20:30, 1F
→
04/17 20:31, , 2F
04/17 20:31, 2F
推
04/17 20:35, , 3F
04/17 20:35, 3F
→
04/17 20:36, , 4F
04/17 20:36, 4F
推
04/17 20:37, , 5F
04/17 20:37, 5F
→
04/17 20:37, , 6F
04/17 20:37, 6F
推
04/17 20:38, , 7F
04/17 20:38, 7F
→
04/17 20:39, , 8F
04/17 20:39, 8F
→
04/17 20:40, , 9F
04/17 20:40, 9F
→
04/17 20:49, , 10F
04/17 20:49, 10F
→
04/17 20:52, , 11F
04/17 20:52, 11F
→
04/17 20:53, , 12F
04/17 20:53, 12F
→
04/17 20:53, , 13F
04/17 20:53, 13F
→
04/17 20:54, , 14F
04/17 20:54, 14F
→
04/17 20:54, , 15F
04/17 20:54, 15F
→
04/17 20:55, , 16F
04/17 20:55, 16F
→
04/17 20:56, , 17F
04/17 20:56, 17F
→
04/17 20:56, , 18F
04/17 20:56, 18F
→
04/17 21:02, , 19F
04/17 21:02, 19F
→
04/17 21:02, , 20F
04/17 21:02, 20F
→
04/17 21:03, , 21F
04/17 21:03, 21F
→
04/17 21:11, , 22F
04/17 21:11, 22F
→
04/17 22:33, , 23F
04/17 22:33, 23F
噓
04/17 22:53, , 24F
04/17 22:53, 24F
→
04/17 22:54, , 25F
04/17 22:54, 25F
→
04/17 23:09, , 26F
04/17 23:09, 26F
推
04/17 23:49, , 27F
04/17 23:49, 27F
→
04/17 23:49, , 28F
04/17 23:49, 28F
→
04/17 23:49, , 29F
04/17 23:49, 29F
推
04/18 12:01, , 30F
04/18 12:01, 30F
→
04/18 12:01, , 31F
04/18 12:01, 31F
推
04/18 15:42, , 32F
04/18 15:42, 32F
→
04/18 16:14, , 33F
04/18 16:14, 33F
→
04/18 20:32, , 34F
04/18 20:32, 34F
推
04/18 21:10, , 35F
04/18 21:10, 35F
推
04/18 21:11, , 36F
04/18 21:11, 36F
→
04/18 21:11, , 37F
04/18 21:11, 37F
→
04/18 21:12, , 38F
04/18 21:12, 38F
→
04/18 22:46, , 39F
04/18 22:46, 39F
推
04/20 08:37, , 40F
04/20 08:37, 40F
→
04/20 08:37, , 41F
04/20 08:37, 41F
→
04/20 08:38, , 42F
04/20 08:38, 42F