[閒聊] 台中市公車真的虧錢嗎?已回收
坦白講我一點也不相信
台中公車業者已經是全台灣公車業者最幸福的
本來8公里免費,現在變10公里免費,的確會使成本增加
但如台中市交通局長講的,只是少賺,不可能賠錢
司機薪水減少是業者將成本增加的部份轉嫁給司機
也有很多人只做1,2站就下車的,反正免錢
我不太相信公車業者會虧錢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.14.60.203
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TaichungBun/M.1464784434.A.C64.html
推
06/01 20:35, , 1F
06/01 20:35, 1F
※ 編輯: winall (119.14.60.203), 06/01/2016 20:36:06
→
06/01 20:36, , 2F
06/01 20:36, 2F
→
06/01 20:36, , 3F
06/01 20:36, 3F
所以我說台中公車業者很幸福了
如果通通不補助,一定比10公里收入還少
很多人因為免費,5站內都會搭,也有1站也在搭的
但如果通通不補助,台中公車可能會倒幾家
→
06/01 20:37, , 4F
06/01 20:37, 4F
※ 編輯: winall (119.14.60.203), 06/01/2016 20:39:21
噓
06/01 20:38, , 5F
06/01 20:38, 5F
推
06/01 20:38, , 6F
06/01 20:38, 6F
噓
06/01 20:39, , 7F
06/01 20:39, 7F
→
06/01 20:40, , 8F
06/01 20:40, 8F
推
06/01 20:40, , 9F
06/01 20:40, 9F
噓
06/01 20:43, , 10F
06/01 20:43, 10F
推
06/01 20:45, , 11F
06/01 20:45, 11F
我不是台中人,但每次去台中,我一定搭公車,不管幾站都會搭
而且我一天搭10幾次(反正不用錢),每次補助20元,就補助200多元了
有補助真的替業者多很多收入
相反的,我去其他縣市可能就不搭公車,會租機車
噓
06/01 20:46, , 12F
06/01 20:46, 12F
噓
06/01 20:46, , 13F
06/01 20:46, 13F
推
06/01 20:47, , 14F
06/01 20:47, 14F
→
06/01 20:47, , 15F
06/01 20:47, 15F
→
06/01 20:47, , 16F
06/01 20:47, 16F
※ 編輯: winall (119.14.60.203), 06/01/2016 20:50:02
→
06/01 20:49, , 17F
06/01 20:49, 17F
推
06/01 20:50, , 18F
06/01 20:50, 18F
推
06/01 20:50, , 19F
06/01 20:50, 19F
→
06/01 20:50, , 20F
06/01 20:50, 20F
→
06/01 20:50, , 21F
06/01 20:50, 21F
推
06/01 20:51, , 22F
06/01 20:51, 22F
→
06/01 20:51, , 23F
06/01 20:51, 23F
推
06/01 20:54, , 24F
06/01 20:54, 24F
推
06/01 20:54, , 25F
06/01 20:54, 25F
→
06/01 20:55, , 26F
06/01 20:55, 26F
→
06/01 20:56, , 27F
06/01 20:56, 27F
推
06/01 21:07, , 28F
06/01 21:07, 28F
→
06/01 21:08, , 29F
06/01 21:08, 29F
→
06/01 21:09, , 30F
06/01 21:09, 30F
→
06/01 21:09, , 31F
06/01 21:09, 31F
→
06/01 21:13, , 32F
06/01 21:13, 32F
噓
06/01 21:14, , 33F
06/01 21:14, 33F
→
06/01 21:14, , 34F
06/01 21:14, 34F
還有 76 則推文
→
06/01 22:18, , 111F
06/01 22:18, 111F
推
06/01 22:31, , 112F
06/01 22:31, 112F
推
06/01 22:53, , 113F
06/01 22:53, 113F
噓
06/01 23:02, , 114F
06/01 23:02, 114F
→
06/01 23:02, , 115F
06/01 23:02, 115F
→
06/01 23:02, , 116F
06/01 23:02, 116F
→
06/01 23:02, , 117F
06/01 23:02, 117F
→
06/01 23:02, , 118F
06/01 23:02, 118F
→
06/01 23:02, , 119F
06/01 23:02, 119F
噓
06/01 23:04, , 120F
06/01 23:04, 120F
→
06/01 23:04, , 121F
06/01 23:04, 121F
→
06/01 23:05, , 122F
06/01 23:05, 122F
→
06/01 23:06, , 123F
06/01 23:06, 123F
→
06/01 23:06, , 124F
06/01 23:06, 124F
推
06/01 23:12, , 125F
06/01 23:12, 125F
→
06/01 23:12, , 126F
06/01 23:12, 126F
→
06/01 23:12, , 127F
06/01 23:12, 127F
→
06/01 23:42, , 128F
06/01 23:42, 128F
→
06/01 23:42, , 129F
06/01 23:42, 129F
推
06/02 00:10, , 130F
06/02 00:10, 130F
→
06/02 00:12, , 131F
06/02 00:12, 131F
推
06/02 00:53, , 132F
06/02 00:53, 132F
推
06/02 04:10, , 133F
06/02 04:10, 133F
推
06/02 06:48, , 134F
06/02 06:48, 134F
→
06/02 06:48, , 135F
06/02 06:48, 135F
→
06/02 07:51, , 136F
06/02 07:51, 136F
噓
06/02 09:00, , 137F
06/02 09:00, 137F
→
06/02 09:19, , 138F
06/02 09:19, 138F
→
06/02 09:19, , 139F
06/02 09:19, 139F
→
06/02 09:19, , 140F
06/02 09:19, 140F
→
06/02 09:19, , 141F
06/02 09:19, 141F
→
06/02 09:19, , 142F
06/02 09:19, 142F
噓
06/02 09:49, , 143F
06/02 09:49, 143F
噓
06/02 14:09, , 144F
06/02 14:09, 144F
→
06/02 14:09, , 145F
06/02 14:09, 145F
推
06/02 19:07, , 146F
06/02 19:07, 146F
推
06/03 06:09, , 147F
06/03 06:09, 147F
→
06/03 06:09, , 148F
06/03 06:09, 148F
噓
06/04 00:59, , 149F
06/04 00:59, 149F
→
06/04 00:59, , 150F
06/04 00:59, 150F