[討論] 茉莉的CWB強度評級
JMA(10min) 95 kts/50m/s 935hPa
JTWC(1min) 115 kts/59m/s 937hPa
CMA(2 min) 52m/s 935hPa
HKO(10min) 165km/h/46m/s
CWB(10min) 40m/s 950hPa
我到底有沒有看錯啊?!看起來也不像是「保守」估計啊,
CWB滯後成這樣真的沒道理啊......
--
推
08/28 23:47,
08/28 23:47
推
08/28 23:58,
08/28 23:58
推
08/28 23:59,
08/28 23:59
示意圖:(〒︿〒)つ⑩ ㄟ(・∀・) 教育部反霸凌專線:
天秤學弟 納莉學姐 0800-200-885
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.43.251.132
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TY_Research/M.1450100552.A.6EE.html
推
12/14 21:52, , 1F
12/14 21:52, 1F
推
12/14 22:11, , 2F
12/14 22:11, 2F
北薩馬省聖羅克一度測得957.1hPa
推
12/14 22:30, , 3F
12/14 22:30, 3F
→
12/14 22:31, , 4F
12/14 22:31, 4F
推
12/14 22:36, , 5F
12/14 22:36, 5F
推
12/14 22:48, , 6F
12/14 22:48, 6F
推
12/14 22:49, , 7F
12/14 22:49, 7F
→
12/14 22:50, , 8F
12/14 22:50, 8F
→
12/14 22:51, , 9F
12/14 22:51, 9F
推
12/14 22:52, , 10F
12/14 22:52, 10F
推
12/14 22:52, , 11F
12/14 22:52, 11F
推
12/14 22:58, , 12F
12/14 22:58, 12F
推
12/14 23:01, , 13F
12/14 23:01, 13F
→
12/14 23:01, , 14F
12/14 23:01, 14F
環流超級細小,根據JMA數據表示,
15m/s以上半徑範圍,北面220km,南面170km,
25m/s以上半徑範圍,全域只有70km,
相當於2011年南瑪都這麼大而已。
我想這會不會是其中一個原因?
推
12/14 23:05, , 15F
12/14 23:05, 15F
推
12/14 23:09, , 16F
12/14 23:09, 16F
推
12/14 23:09, , 17F
12/14 23:09, 17F
→
12/14 23:10, , 18F
12/14 23:10, 18F
→
12/14 23:10, , 19F
12/14 23:10, 19F
今年強度遭CWB低估的颱風還不少:紅霞、昌鴻、蘇迪勒(登臺前)、天鵝、彩虹、薔琵
推
12/14 23:19, , 20F
12/14 23:19, 20F
→
12/14 23:19, , 21F
12/14 23:19, 21F
→
12/14 23:19, , 22F
12/14 23:19, 22F
我漏打了抱歉,是「侵襲琉球群島」時的天鵝,CWB當時只評40m/s,
另外如果真如閣下所言,CWB應該要好好檢討才是。
推
12/14 23:21, , 23F
12/14 23:21, 23F
其實我覺得茉莉的IR型態也不錯啊(相信不少人都這麼想),
那擺在CWB面前也只評40m/s,我都有點懷疑他們德法到底是怎麼對應的......
→
12/14 23:22, , 24F
12/14 23:22, 24F
推
12/14 23:24, , 25F
12/14 23:24, 25F
推
12/14 23:31, , 26F
12/14 23:31, 26F
→
12/14 23:32, , 27F
12/14 23:32, 27F
推
12/14 23:32, , 28F
12/14 23:32, 28F
我忍不住吐槽一下,請問鬼島記者懂強度評級?
推
12/14 23:38, , 29F
12/14 23:38, 29F
→
12/14 23:39, , 30F
12/14 23:39, 30F
推
12/14 23:41, , 31F
12/14 23:41, 31F
→
12/14 23:43, , 32F
12/14 23:43, 32F
推
12/14 23:59, , 33F
12/14 23:59, 33F
→
12/15 00:00, , 34F
12/15 00:00, 34F
→
12/15 00:04, , 35F
12/15 00:04, 35F
推
12/15 00:23, , 36F
12/15 00:23, 36F
→
12/15 00:23, , 37F
12/15 00:23, 37F
推
12/15 07:03, , 38F
12/15 07:03, 38F
→
12/15 07:03, , 39F
12/15 07:03, 39F
→
12/15 07:03, , 40F
12/15 07:03, 40F
→
12/15 07:04, , 41F
12/15 07:04, 41F
→
12/15 07:05, , 42F
12/15 07:05, 42F
我是認為強度數據不能亂評,BST也很重要,這才是負責任的表現。
HKO都如此重視,CWB到底在幹嘛啊?
推
12/15 07:21, , 43F
12/15 07:21, 43F
推
12/15 08:38, , 44F
12/15 08:38, 44F
→
12/15 08:39, , 45F
12/15 08:39, 45F
推
12/15 08:45, , 46F
12/15 08:45, 46F
→
12/15 08:45, , 47F
12/15 08:45, 47F
推
12/15 09:15, , 48F
12/15 09:15, 48F
推
12/15 10:15, , 49F
12/15 10:15, 49F
推
12/15 10:29, , 50F
12/15 10:29, 50F
推
12/15 10:40, , 51F
12/15 10:40, 51F
推
12/15 10:44, , 52F
12/15 10:44, 52F
其實我喜歡茉莉>寶發,
但我的眼鏡因為茉莉,已經不知道摔了幾副了......
推
12/15 10:47, , 53F
12/15 10:47, 53F
推
12/15 14:01, , 54F
12/15 14:01, 54F
人家茉莉很厲害又堅強啊,我超喜歡這種颱風的wwwww
※ 編輯: TenbeensWu (118.160.208.171), 12/15/2015 22:41:08


