[請益] 閱讀TPO14:Children and Advertising

看板TOEFL_iBT作者 (力)時間13年前 (2010/10/05 11:59), 編輯推噓1(103)
留言4則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
各位板友好 想請問一題 原文: Certainly, rational appeals in advertising aimed at children are limited, as most advertisements use emotional and indirect appeals to psychological states or associations. 8. Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage? (A) Rational appeals in advertising are certainly limited by children's emotional immaturity and the indirect nature of their associations. (B) Indirect appeals to children's psychological states or associations can limit the effectiveness of rational appeals in advertising. (C) Rational appeals play a much smaller role in advertisements for children than emotional appeals and psychological associations do. (D) Rational appeals in advertising aimed at children should certainly be limited until the children are emotionally and psychologically ready. 答案是(C) 看了答案之後還是覺得怪怪的 我對原文的理解是 因為rational appeals 有限制,所以才要用emotional appeals。 所以我感覺不出來有比較的意思(還是我搞錯意思了@@) 而且其實我不懂原文第二句的 as 是什麼意思? 可以麻煩板上的高手幫忙解答一下嗎? 感恩~!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.43.142

10/05 12:10, , 1F
我覺得他是說rational是少數 大部分的廣告還是emotional
10/05 12:10, 1F

10/05 12:44, , 2F
as就是等同...rational limits = emotional appeals
10/05 12:44, 2F

10/05 13:35, , 3F
agree with littlegreen.
10/05 13:35, 3F

10/07 00:56, , 4F
感謝解答~
10/07 00:56, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #1CggAyU3 (TOEFL_iBT)