Re: [請益] 黃金29篇 Electricity from Wind 第13, …

看板TOEFL_iBT作者 (bnbnbn)時間14年前 (2010/08/02 14:23), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 13→)
留言15則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ 引述《xacross (xacross)》之銘言： : (1) : 請問像下面這種填句子的類型該怎麼解才對？ : Paragraph 1: Since 1980, the use of wind to produce electricity has been growing rapidly. : █In 1994 there were nearly 20,000 wind turbines worldwide, most grouped in clusters called : wind farms that collectively produced 3,000 megawatts of electricity. █Most were in : Denmark (which got 3 percent of its electricity from wind turbines) and California (where : 17,000 machines produced 1 percent of the state’s electricity, enough to meet the : residential needs of a city as large as San Francisco). █In principle, all the power : needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting the wind potential of just : three states—North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas. █ : 題目要填入的句子是： : Some companies in the power industry are aware of this wider possibility and are : planning sizable wind-farm projects in states other than California. : 我選的是 3 ，答案是 4，該怎麼找邏輯才對？ : (2) : 第14題的第4個選項 : The wind energy produced by just a small number of states could supply all of the power needs of the United States. : 在第一段就有提到 : In principle, all the power needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting the wind potential of just three states—North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas. : 為什麼答案沒有這個選項？ : 麻煩高手解惑了，謝謝 12 Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the author’s opinion about wind energy? 請問文中12題的答案 雖然答案給的是2(The advantages of wind energy outweigh the disadvantages.) 但是4(Wind energy will eventually supply many countries with most of their electricity. )感覺似乎沒這麼果斷況且文末也的確 提到..In theory, Argentina, Canada, Chile, China, Russia, and the United Kingdom could use wind to meet all of their energy needs.. 想請問4是錯在哪裡 謝謝各位高手的想法 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.248.201.66 ※ 編輯: mde 來自: 60.248.201.66 (08/02 14:25)
推
08/02 14:57, , 1F
沒看內文，直覺4只是trivial factor，沒有"accurately"
08/02 14:57, 1F
→
08/02 14:57, , 2F
reflect 這種題真的很哭邀= ="
08/02 14:57, 2F
推
08/02 19:15, , 3F
因為內文只有:In theory, Argentina, Canada, Chile, ...
08/02 19:15, 3F
→
08/02 19:15, , 4F
could use wind to meet all of their energy needs.
08/02 19:15, 4F
→
08/02 19:16, , 5F
"理論上，這些國家可以使用風力來滿足全部的能源需求。"
08/02 19:16, 5F
→
08/02 19:16, , 6F
但是最後會不會這麼作...不一定。
08/02 19:16, 6F
→
08/02 19:17, , 7F
而你把第五段跟第六段放在一起看的話，第五段在講風力
08/02 19:17, 7F
→
08/02 19:18, , 8F
造成的disadvantage沒那麼嚴重，第六段推廣跟講優點。
08/02 19:18, 8F
→
08/02 19:18, , 9F
答案二比較好
08/02 19:18, 9F
→
08/02 19:19, , 10F
如果題目有"according to paragraph 6"，那就另當別論
08/02 19:19, 10F
→
08/02 19:32, , 11F
most of表要超過一半以上 文中只有提部分幾個國家
08/02 19:32, 11F
→
08/02 19:33, , 12F
此外 第六段最後一句有提到more than 10% 也沒超過半數
08/02 19:33, 12F
→
08/02 20:07, , 13F
答案4是 "most of their electricity."
08/02 20:07, 13F
→
08/02 20:07, , 14F
文章是 "...meet all of their energy needs."
08/02 20:07, 14F
→
08/02 20:07, , 15F
most of不是指國家數 :)
08/02 20:07, 15F
‣ 更多 mde 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CLcHl1P (TOEFL_iBT)