[認真] 三行且滿30字以上的必要?
剛剛po文,我自認不是廢文
但似乎因為字數過於短,然後就被砍了
我了解規定是這樣規定
所以我下次會注意。
只是問題是
滿三行且滿30字的意義在哪?
我認為,文字短和不滿三行的規定,並不具備被砍文的必要性
我只是提出我的想法和大家分享一下
順便請問大家有推薦的眼鏡行嗎??
便宜尤佳!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.34.178.199
推
06/02 20:06, , 1F
06/02 20:06, 1F
→
06/02 20:10, , 2F
06/02 20:10, 2F
→
06/02 20:14, , 3F
06/02 20:14, 3F
推
06/02 20:14, , 4F
06/02 20:14, 4F
→
06/02 20:14, , 5F
06/02 20:14, 5F
→
06/02 20:15, , 6F
06/02 20:15, 6F
→
06/02 20:17, , 7F
06/02 20:17, 7F
→
06/02 20:17, , 8F
06/02 20:17, 8F
→
06/02 20:18, , 9F
06/02 20:18, 9F
→
06/02 20:18, , 10F
06/02 20:18, 10F
→
06/02 20:19, , 11F
06/02 20:19, 11F
→
06/02 20:20, , 12F
06/02 20:20, 12F
不過我也只是想了解一下別人對這項規定的看法,我既然在這PO文,我還是會守規矩。
我只是想了解手這樣規矩的意義在哪? 如果短文不等於廢文的話
※ 編輯: makabc135 來自: 114.34.178.199 (06/02 20:23)
→
06/02 20:29, , 13F
06/02 20:29, 13F
→
06/02 20:30, , 14F
06/02 20:30, 14F
→
06/02 20:34, , 15F
06/02 20:34, 15F
推
06/02 20:45, , 16F
06/02 20:45, 16F
→
06/02 20:45, , 17F
06/02 20:45, 17F
→
06/02 20:49, , 18F
06/02 20:49, 18F
→
06/02 20:49, , 19F
06/02 20:49, 19F
推
06/02 20:49, , 20F
06/02 20:49, 20F
→
06/02 20:50, , 21F
06/02 20:50, 21F
→
06/02 20:51, , 22F
06/02 20:51, 22F
→
06/02 20:52, , 23F
06/02 20:52, 23F
→
06/02 20:52, , 24F
06/02 20:52, 24F
推
06/02 21:14, , 25F
06/02 21:14, 25F
推
06/02 21:16, , 26F
06/02 21:16, 26F
推
06/02 21:28, , 27F
06/02 21:28, 27F
→
06/02 21:29, , 28F
06/02 21:29, 28F
→
06/02 21:29, , 29F
06/02 21:29, 29F
推
06/02 21:35, , 30F
06/02 21:35, 30F
推
06/02 22:55, , 31F
06/02 22:55, 31F
推
06/03 00:32, , 32F
06/03 00:32, 32F
→
06/03 00:47, , 33F
06/03 00:47, 33F
推
06/03 01:34, , 34F
06/03 01:34, 34F
推
06/04 08:28, , 35F
06/04 08:28, 35F
→
06/04 11:25, , 36F
06/04 11:25, 36F
→
08/10 22:51, , 37F
08/10 22:51, 37F
→
09/12 10:35, , 38F
09/12 10:35, 38F