[新聞] 奪思科大單?聯發科:媒體臆測
1.原文連結:
http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/3920964
2.原文內容:
1.事實發生日:106/09/14
2.公司名稱:聯發科技股份有限公司
3.與公司關係(請輸入本公司或子公司):本公司
4.相互持股比例:不適用
5.傳播媒體名稱:經濟日報
6.報導內容:”聯發科奪思科大單”
7.發生緣由:
該篇報導非本公司之新聞發佈,報導純屬媒體臆測及推論,聯發科技特此聲明。
8.因應措施:發佈重大訊息說明。
9.其他應敘明事項:無
3.心得/評論:
台灣股市真的不能碰,連經濟日報這種大報都敢出這種未向聯發科求證的消息。
合理懷疑這根本是有串通炒作的嫌疑。
現在被聯發科打臉了。金管會是不是應該出來管一管?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.139.186
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1505789352.A.5EF.html
→
09/19 10:55, , 1F
09/19 10:55, 1F
推
09/19 10:58, , 2F
09/19 10:58, 2F
→
09/19 10:58, , 3F
09/19 10:58, 3F
推
09/19 10:59, , 4F
09/19 10:59, 4F
→
09/19 10:59, , 5F
09/19 10:59, 5F
※ 編輯: wartwo (36.235.139.186), 09/19/2017 11:07:18
推
09/19 11:07, , 6F
09/19 11:07, 6F
→
09/19 11:07, , 7F
09/19 11:07, 7F
推
09/19 11:13, , 8F
09/19 11:13, 8F
推
09/19 11:20, , 9F
09/19 11:20, 9F
→
09/19 11:21, , 10F
09/19 11:21, 10F
推
09/19 11:24, , 11F
09/19 11:24, 11F
→
09/19 11:24, , 12F
09/19 11:24, 12F
→
09/19 11:24, , 13F
09/19 11:24, 13F
→
09/19 11:25, , 14F
09/19 11:25, 14F
→
09/19 11:25, , 15F
09/19 11:25, 15F
推
09/19 11:28, , 16F
09/19 11:28, 16F
→
09/19 11:28, , 17F
09/19 11:28, 17F
→
09/19 11:32, , 18F
09/19 11:32, 18F
→
09/19 11:32, , 19F
09/19 11:32, 19F
→
09/19 11:33, , 20F
09/19 11:33, 20F
推
09/19 11:34, , 21F
09/19 11:34, 21F
推
09/19 11:34, , 22F
09/19 11:34, 22F
→
09/19 11:34, , 23F
09/19 11:34, 23F
→
09/19 11:35, , 24F
09/19 11:35, 24F
→
09/19 11:35, , 25F
09/19 11:35, 25F
→
09/19 11:35, , 26F
09/19 11:35, 26F
→
09/19 11:35, , 27F
09/19 11:35, 27F
→
09/19 11:36, , 28F
09/19 11:36, 28F
→
09/19 11:36, , 29F
09/19 11:36, 29F
→
09/19 11:36, , 30F
09/19 11:36, 30F
推
09/19 11:43, , 31F
09/19 11:43, 31F
→
09/19 11:43, , 32F
09/19 11:43, 32F
推
09/19 11:47, , 33F
09/19 11:47, 33F
推
09/19 11:47, , 34F
09/19 11:47, 34F
推
09/19 11:50, , 35F
09/19 11:50, 35F
推
09/19 11:50, , 36F
09/19 11:50, 36F
→
09/19 11:51, , 37F
09/19 11:51, 37F
→
09/19 11:51, , 38F
09/19 11:51, 38F
推
09/19 11:51, , 39F
09/19 11:51, 39F
推
09/19 11:52, , 40F
09/19 11:52, 40F
→
09/19 11:53, , 41F
09/19 11:53, 41F
→
09/19 11:53, , 42F
09/19 11:53, 42F
推
09/19 11:57, , 43F
09/19 11:57, 43F
推
09/19 11:57, , 44F
09/19 11:57, 44F
以現實面看,除非有新產品發酵,不然MTK明年一定是不好。
※ 編輯: wartwo (36.235.139.186), 09/19/2017 11:59:25
→
09/19 11:58, , 45F
09/19 11:58, 45F
→
09/19 11:59, , 46F
09/19 11:59, 46F
→
09/19 12:01, , 47F
09/19 12:01, 47F
推
09/19 12:02, , 48F
09/19 12:02, 48F
→
09/19 12:02, , 49F
09/19 12:02, 49F
推
09/19 12:13, , 50F
09/19 12:13, 50F
推
09/19 12:14, , 51F
09/19 12:14, 51F
→
09/19 12:15, , 52F
09/19 12:15, 52F
推
09/19 12:23, , 53F
09/19 12:23, 53F
→
09/19 12:23, , 54F
09/19 12:23, 54F
→
09/19 12:23, , 55F
09/19 12:23, 55F
→
09/19 12:25, , 56F
09/19 12:25, 56F
推
09/19 13:57, , 57F
09/19 13:57, 57F
推
09/19 14:10, , 58F
09/19 14:10, 58F
→
09/19 17:26, , 59F
09/19 17:26, 59F
→
09/19 17:27, , 60F
09/19 17:27, 60F
→
09/19 17:28, , 61F
09/19 17:28, 61F
→
09/19 17:29, , 62F
09/19 17:29, 62F
而且是高很多,高通的技術本來就比MTK強很多,又用領先一代的製程製造,成本會比MTK低非常多。
→
09/19 17:29, , 63F
09/19 17:29, 63F
→
09/19 17:30, , 64F
09/19 17:30, 64F
→
09/19 17:31, , 65F
09/19 17:31, 65F
→
09/19 17:31, , 66F
09/19 17:31, 66F
→
09/19 17:33, , 67F
09/19 17:33, 67F
→
09/19 17:33, , 68F
09/19 17:33, 68F
※ 編輯: wartwo (36.235.139.186), 09/19/2017 17:56:25
推
09/19 19:04, , 69F
09/19 19:04, 69F
→
09/19 19:06, , 70F
09/19 19:06, 70F
推
09/19 19:19, , 71F
09/19 19:19, 71F
推
09/19 19:32, , 72F
09/19 19:32, 72F
是10nm不是7nm. 只要量大,就能打消光罩成本。而目前高通技術領先很多。
沒有問題。
※ 編輯: wartwo (36.235.139.186), 09/19/2017 19:47:56
噓
09/19 20:25, , 73F
09/19 20:25, 73F
→
09/19 20:25, , 74F
09/19 20:25, 74F
噓
09/19 20:28, , 75F
09/19 20:28, 75F
→
09/19 20:28, , 76F
09/19 20:28, 76F
→
09/19 20:28, , 77F
09/19 20:28, 77F
→
09/19 20:28, , 78F
09/19 20:28, 78F
上不上400,我不敢講,但MTK走下坡是跑不掉的,記得上400趕快賣光。
※ 編輯: wartwo (36.235.139.186), 09/19/2017 20:53:32
推
09/19 20:53, , 79F
09/19 20:53, 79F
推
09/19 22:44, , 80F
09/19 22:44, 80F