[請益] 盈再率的bug
相信有看過巴菲特選股魔法書
都知道盈再率吧!
盈再率的分子是
(長期投資4+固定資產4-長期投資0-長期投資0)
書中強調
分子求出來的值是公司又多花了多少錢
在資本支出上
但是，
這個定義感覺怪怪的....
大家覺得這個定義合理嗎?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my LGE LG-E988.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.142.246.36
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1443427642.A.027.html
推
09/28 16:23, , 1F
09/28 16:23, 1F
推
09/28 16:26, , 2F
09/28 16:26, 2F
推
09/28 16:39, , 3F
09/28 16:39, 3F
→
09/28 17:05, , 4F
09/28 17:05, 4F
→
09/28 17:06, , 5F
09/28 17:06, 5F
→
09/28 17:13, , 6F
09/28 17:13, 6F
推
09/28 18:02, , 7F
09/28 18:02, 7F
推
09/28 18:26, , 8F
09/28 18:26, 8F
推
09/28 18:31, , 9F
09/28 18:31, 9F
→
09/28 19:36, , 10F
09/28 19:36, 10F
→
09/28 19:37, , 11F
09/28 19:37, 11F
→
09/28 19:37, , 12F
09/28 19:37, 12F
推
09/28 23:20, , 13F
09/28 23:20, 13F
推
09/29 09:24, , 14F
09/29 09:24, 14F
→
09/29 09:24, , 15F
09/29 09:24, 15F
→
09/29 10:56, , 16F
09/29 10:56, 16F
推
10/01 01:38, , 17F
10/01 01:38, 17F