Fw: [新聞] 沒賣金衛TDR 連勝文:開會通知單可證明已回收
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1K8bkZEk ]
作者: pagedown455 (pagedown455) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [新聞] 沒賣金衛TDR 連勝文:開會通知單可證明
時間: Wed Sep 24 13:50:24 2014
1.媒體來源: 蘋果
2.完整新聞標題/內文:
國民黨台北市長參選人連勝文承諾有賣任何一股金衛TDR就退選,還遭到網友「鍵盤辦案
」找出資料質疑。連陣營昨已否認,不過,連勝文上午在競選總部再度澄清,本來購買
540張金衛股票,去年年底參加現金增資,今年年初又獲得現金增資股票270張,加起來總
共810張,上周金衛公司召開股東公司開會通知,上面明明寫一清二楚就是810張,「沒有
變。」
連勝文表示,他當初負責的創投公司連續三年獲得國際評比組織評為「亞洲十大最佳基金
」,這不是他編出來的,是有根據的。他管理的公司分成基金與資產管理公司,資產管理
公司草創初期跟所有新創事業一樣不可能賺錢,但基金公司幫投資人獲得非常好的回報。
連解釋到最後突然笑著說「這樣講好像在賣基金,我在選市長,不好意思。」(陳培煌/
台北報導)
3.新聞連結:
http://ppt.cc/2Yrp
4.備註:
現在是有網軍進攻嗎?
一直置底轉移焦點的新聞
現在神豬都還沒解釋清楚金衛TDR勒
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.97.179
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1411537827.A.3AE.html
→
09/24 13:51, , 1F
09/24 13:51, 1F
→
09/24 13:51, , 2F
09/24 13:51, 2F
推
09/24 13:52, , 3F
09/24 13:52, 3F
→
09/24 13:52, , 4F
09/24 13:52, 4F
→
09/24 13:52, , 5F
09/24 13:52, 5F
推
09/24 13:52, , 6F
09/24 13:52, 6F
→
09/24 13:52, , 7F
09/24 13:52, 7F
推
09/24 13:52, , 8F
09/24 13:52, 8F
噓
09/24 13:52, , 9F
09/24 13:52, 9F
→
09/24 13:53, , 10F
09/24 13:53, 10F
推
09/24 13:53, , 11F
09/24 13:53, 11F
推
09/24 13:54, , 12F
09/24 13:54, 12F
推
09/24 13:54, , 13F
09/24 13:54, 13F
→
09/24 13:55, , 14F
09/24 13:55, 14F
推
09/24 13:55, , 15F
09/24 13:55, 15F
→
09/24 13:56, , 16F
09/24 13:56, 16F
→
09/24 13:56, , 17F
09/24 13:56, 17F
推
09/24 13:57, , 18F
09/24 13:57, 18F
→
09/24 13:57, , 19F
09/24 13:57, 19F
→
09/24 13:57, , 20F
09/24 13:57, 20F
推
09/24 13:58, , 21F
09/24 13:58, 21F
→
09/24 13:58, , 22F
09/24 13:58, 22F
推
09/24 13:58, , 23F
09/24 13:58, 23F
推
09/24 13:59, , 24F
09/24 13:59, 24F
推
09/24 14:00, , 25F
09/24 14:00, 25F
→
09/24 14:00, , 26F
09/24 14:00, 26F
→
09/24 14:01, , 27F
09/24 14:01, 27F
推
09/24 14:01, , 28F
09/24 14:01, 28F
→
09/24 14:03, , 29F
09/24 14:03, 29F
推
09/24 14:04, , 30F
09/24 14:04, 30F
→
09/24 14:05, , 31F
09/24 14:05, 31F
推
09/24 14:05, , 32F
09/24 14:05, 32F
→
09/24 14:05, , 33F
09/24 14:05, 33F
噓
09/24 14:05, , 34F
09/24 14:05, 34F
推
09/24 14:06, , 35F
09/24 14:06, 35F
推
09/24 14:06, , 36F
09/24 14:06, 36F
→
09/24 14:07, , 37F
09/24 14:07, 37F
→
09/24 14:08, , 38F
09/24 14:08, 38F
噓
09/24 14:09, , 39F
09/24 14:09, 39F
→
09/24 14:10, , 40F
09/24 14:10, 40F
噓
09/24 14:11, , 41F
09/24 14:11, 41F
→
09/24 14:11, , 42F
09/24 14:11, 42F
推
09/24 14:17, , 43F
09/24 14:17, 43F
噓
09/24 14:19, , 44F
09/24 14:19, 44F
→
09/24 14:21, , 45F
09/24 14:21, 45F
噓
09/24 14:22, , 46F
09/24 14:22, 46F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: mooto (211.23.86.187), 09/24/2014 14:22:42
→
09/24 14:23, , 47F
09/24 14:23, 47F
噓
09/24 14:28, , 48F
09/24 14:28, 48F
推
09/24 14:37, , 49F
09/24 14:37, 49F
噓
09/24 14:44, , 50F
09/24 14:44, 50F
→
09/24 14:44, , 51F
09/24 14:44, 51F
的確沒有人知道
股權分散表已經寫810張 這沒辦法證明就是他
理論上 他持有的540張也不一定要全部認購 除非他能證明這點(繳款書不要塗掉)
問題就在 認股率是1/2 就這麼剛好540+(540/2)=810 這數字太難湊巧對上
※ 編輯: mooto (211.23.86.187), 09/24/2014 14:54:19
→
09/24 14:58, , 52F
09/24 14:58, 52F
推
09/24 15:01, , 53F
09/24 15:01, 53F
推
09/24 15:11, , 54F
09/24 15:11, 54F
那時候股價6塊多 現增可以用3.84認 兩單位可以認一單位
今年股價最高來到9塊 最低也有6塊 你覺得邏輯在哪呢?
→
09/24 15:18, , 55F
09/24 15:18, 55F
→
09/24 15:18, , 56F
09/24 15:18, 56F
噓
09/24 15:34, , 57F
09/24 15:34, 57F
噓
09/24 15:41, , 58F
09/24 15:41, 58F
→
09/24 15:45, , 59F
09/24 15:45, 59F
噓
09/24 16:20, , 60F
09/24 16:20, 60F
※ 編輯: mooto (211.23.86.187), 09/24/2014 16:31:12
→
09/24 16:46, , 61F
09/24 16:46, 61F
→
09/24 18:23, , 62F
09/24 18:23, 62F
推
09/24 18:56, , 63F
09/24 18:56, 63F
推
09/24 20:06, , 64F
09/24 20:06, 64F
→
09/24 20:07, , 65F
09/24 20:07, 65F
推
09/24 20:10, , 66F
09/24 20:10, 66F
→
09/24 20:11, , 67F
09/24 20:11, 67F
推
09/24 21:52, , 68F
09/24 21:52, 68F
推
09/24 23:05, , 69F
09/24 23:05, 69F
推
09/25 18:28, , 70F
09/25 18:28, 70F