[請益] 請問做這行的是不是一定要有熱忱?
看板Soft_Job作者finland0715 (finland0715)時間13年前 (2012/12/12 09:51)推噓22(22推 0噓 51→)留言73則, 28人參與討論串1/6 (看更多)
想請問工程師是不是一定要有上進心才能勝任?
這陣子剛被一家公司給解雇,老闆認為我對公司沒有貢獻
依我的感覺來說,在資訊業科技業通常需要一直學習新的事物,
包括技術、工具都要一直學習,沒辦法說學完了就可以一招打天下,
光是這份工作就必須一直不斷學習新的東西很多年,我就覺得好無力也好累...
例如當個asp.net工程師,
必須要了解.net framework、html、javascript、css、ajax、xml、sql、database
以我的心態來說,大概是上班時候工作學習,不過下班之後就不想在自修學習,
假日也不會想進修一些相關的書籍,也不想加班,
我沒有什麼上進心或是熱忱,只求溫飽,可以的話存一點錢,
請問現在的我是不是的確不適合走資訊業或是科技業這一行?
會這麼問只是覺得資訊業或是科技業好像都是一些常常有上進心肯學習的人在走的,
像我這種人是無法在資訊業或是科技業生存,
想聽聽看各位前輩們是否也認同我的想法,謝謝收看~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.0.26
※ 編輯: finland0715 來自: 111.248.0.26 (12/12 09:56)
推
12/12 09:54, , 1F
12/12 09:54, 1F
→
12/12 09:55, , 2F
12/12 09:55, 2F
你說的對...以在台灣這種環境底下...22k已經很不錯了....~"~
※ 編輯: finland0715 來自: 111.248.0.26 (12/12 09:58)
推
12/12 09:59, , 3F
12/12 09:59, 3F
→
12/12 10:05, , 4F
12/12 10:05, 4F
→
12/12 10:32, , 5F
12/12 10:32, 5F
→
12/12 10:34, , 6F
12/12 10:34, 6F
推
12/12 10:55, , 7F
12/12 10:55, 7F
推
12/12 11:55, , 8F
12/12 11:55, 8F
→
12/12 11:55, , 9F
12/12 11:55, 9F
→
12/12 11:56, , 10F
12/12 11:56, 10F
推
12/12 12:04, , 11F
12/12 12:04, 11F
→
12/12 12:59, , 12F
12/12 12:59, 12F
→
12/12 13:00, , 13F
12/12 13:00, 13F
→
12/12 13:01, , 14F
12/12 13:01, 14F
→
12/12 13:02, , 15F
12/12 13:02, 15F
→
12/12 13:03, , 16F
12/12 13:03, 16F
→
12/12 13:04, , 17F
12/12 13:04, 17F
→
12/12 13:05, , 18F
12/12 13:05, 18F
→
12/12 13:06, , 19F
12/12 13:06, 19F
推
12/12 13:12, , 20F
12/12 13:12, 20F
→
12/12 13:13, , 21F
12/12 13:13, 21F
→
12/12 14:06, , 22F
12/12 14:06, 22F
推
12/12 14:27, , 23F
12/12 14:27, 23F
推
12/12 14:38, , 24F
12/12 14:38, 24F
→
12/12 14:39, , 25F
12/12 14:39, 25F
→
12/12 14:39, , 26F
12/12 14:39, 26F
→
12/12 14:39, , 27F
12/12 14:39, 27F
推
12/12 14:41, , 28F
12/12 14:41, 28F
→
12/12 14:42, , 29F
12/12 14:42, 29F
→
12/12 14:42, , 30F
12/12 14:42, 30F
→
12/12 14:43, , 31F
12/12 14:43, 31F
→
12/12 15:40, , 32F
12/12 15:40, 32F
推
12/12 16:43, , 33F
12/12 16:43, 33F
→
12/12 16:44, , 34F
12/12 16:44, 34F
→
12/12 16:44, , 35F
12/12 16:44, 35F
→
12/12 16:45, , 36F
12/12 16:45, 36F
推
12/12 17:18, , 37F
12/12 17:18, 37F
→
12/12 17:21, , 38F
12/12 17:21, 38F
→
12/12 17:21, , 39F
12/12 17:21, 39F
→
12/12 17:28, , 40F
12/12 17:28, 40F
→
12/12 17:28, , 41F
12/12 17:28, 41F
推
12/12 17:33, , 42F
12/12 17:33, 42F
→
12/12 19:22, , 43F
12/12 19:22, 43F
→
12/12 19:22, , 44F
12/12 19:22, 44F
推
12/12 20:26, , 45F
12/12 20:26, 45F
→
12/12 20:27, , 46F
12/12 20:27, 46F
推
12/12 20:48, , 47F
12/12 20:48, 47F
推
12/12 20:55, , 48F
12/12 20:55, 48F
推
12/12 22:40, , 49F
12/12 22:40, 49F
→
12/12 22:41, , 50F
12/12 22:41, 50F
→
12/12 22:53, , 51F
12/12 22:53, 51F
→
12/12 22:54, , 52F
12/12 22:54, 52F
→
12/12 22:55, , 53F
12/12 22:55, 53F
→
12/12 22:56, , 54F
12/12 22:56, 54F
→
12/12 22:57, , 55F
12/12 22:57, 55F
→
12/13 00:08, , 56F
12/13 00:08, 56F
推
12/13 00:13, , 57F
12/13 00:13, 57F
推
12/13 01:16, , 58F
12/13 01:16, 58F
推
12/13 12:44, , 59F
12/13 12:44, 59F
→
12/13 12:45, , 60F
12/13 12:45, 60F
→
12/13 12:45, , 61F
12/13 12:45, 61F
→
12/13 13:55, , 62F
12/13 13:55, 62F
→
12/13 13:57, , 63F
12/13 13:57, 63F
→
12/13 14:00, , 64F
12/13 14:00, 64F
→
12/13 14:07, , 65F
12/13 14:07, 65F
推
12/13 16:50, , 66F
12/13 16:50, 66F
推
12/13 22:24, , 67F
12/13 22:24, 67F
推
12/15 15:34, , 68F
12/15 15:34, 68F
→
12/15 15:35, , 69F
12/15 15:35, 69F
→
12/15 15:37, , 70F
12/15 15:37, 70F
→
12/15 15:39, , 71F
12/15 15:39, 71F
→
12/15 15:40, , 72F
12/15 15:40, 72F
→
12/15 15:42, , 73F
12/15 15:42, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):