Re: [問題] 關於台清交碩班
我再講一次這篇的論點
基本上同一間大學 研究所比大學好考 這不用爭辯 的確是如此
這邊要說的是中央 海大 逢甲電機 都沒差 都會上台清交
事實是如此嗎?不要因為一個逢甲電機上了台大電機就說電機好考
這就好像你說中國海專可以出郭台銘所以要當老闆讀哪都沒差嗎?
真的要比較就去比較應屆逢甲電機上台大研究所的比例才對
而不是在那裡打高空說台大很好洗 請別誤導高中生好嗎?
就算選補習班你也會去看幾個上台大對吧!
※ 引述《niutse (波加波加)》之銘言:
: 看到版上有人在問
: 如果是2類理工
: 讀台清交以外的學校的選擇
: 很多版有都會說
: "沒差啦反正以後都會上台清交碩班"
: 小弟是一類組所以不清楚 只知道台大的管院碩班超難考
: 想問台清交2類碩班真的有這麼好考嗎?
: 隨便一個學校
: 我看到有中央 海大 甚至到上面的逢甲電機
: 都說沒差反正碩班都會上台清交
: 真的每個學校的2類都考的上台清交碩班
: 那其他學校2類碩班是誰會去讀啊
: 請問台清交的2類說碩班真的有那麼好考嗎?
: 還是就跟大家多益都900以上等又是鄉民在嘴砲?
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.17.208.7
推
08/13 15:34, , 1F
08/13 15:34, 1F
→
08/13 15:57, , 2F
08/13 15:57, 2F
→
08/13 15:58, , 3F
08/13 15:58, 3F
→
08/13 16:00, , 4F
08/13 16:00, 4F
→
08/13 16:38, , 5F
08/13 16:38, 5F
推
08/13 17:12, , 6F
08/13 17:12, 6F
→
08/13 17:34, , 7F
08/13 17:34, 7F
推
08/13 18:16, , 8F
08/13 18:16, 8F
→
08/13 20:19, , 9F
08/13 20:19, 9F
→
08/13 20:20, , 10F
08/13 20:20, 10F
→
08/13 20:30, , 11F
08/13 20:30, 11F
→
08/13 20:31, , 12F
08/13 20:31, 12F
推
08/13 20:31, , 13F
08/13 20:31, 13F
→
08/13 20:32, , 14F
08/13 20:32, 14F
→
08/13 20:48, , 15F
08/13 20:48, 15F
→
08/13 20:49, , 16F
08/13 20:49, 16F
→
08/13 20:50, , 17F
08/13 20:50, 17F
→
08/13 20:52, , 18F
08/13 20:52, 18F
→
08/13 20:53, , 19F
08/13 20:53, 19F
推
08/13 21:10, , 20F
08/13 21:10, 20F
→
08/13 21:15, , 21F
08/13 21:15, 21F
→
08/13 21:16, , 22F
08/13 21:16, 22F
→
08/13 21:16, , 23F
08/13 21:16, 23F
→
08/13 22:19, , 24F
08/13 22:19, 24F
→
08/13 22:20, , 25F
08/13 22:20, 25F
→
08/13 22:22, , 26F
08/13 22:22, 26F
→
08/13 22:22, , 27F
08/13 22:22, 27F
→
08/13 22:23, , 28F
08/13 22:23, 28F
→
08/13 22:25, , 29F
08/13 22:25, 29F
→
08/13 22:26, , 30F
08/13 22:26, 30F
→
08/13 22:27, , 31F
08/13 22:27, 31F
→
08/13 23:02, , 32F
08/13 23:02, 32F
→
08/13 23:04, , 33F
08/13 23:04, 33F
→
08/13 23:04, , 34F
08/13 23:04, 34F
推
08/13 23:10, , 35F
08/13 23:10, 35F
→
08/13 23:11, , 36F
08/13 23:11, 36F
→
08/13 23:19, , 37F
08/13 23:19, 37F
→
08/13 23:20, , 38F
08/13 23:20, 38F
推
08/13 23:21, , 39F
08/13 23:21, 39F
推
08/14 00:34, , 40F
08/14 00:34, 40F
→
08/14 00:38, , 41F
08/14 00:38, 41F
推
08/14 00:42, , 42F
08/14 00:42, 42F
→
08/14 00:43, , 43F
08/14 00:43, 43F
→
08/14 03:52, , 44F
08/14 03:52, 44F
推
08/14 04:28, , 45F
08/14 04:28, 45F
推
08/14 11:44, , 46F
08/14 11:44, 46F
→
08/14 11:45, , 47F
08/14 11:45, 47F
→
08/14 11:46, , 48F
08/14 11:46, 48F
→
08/14 11:47, , 49F
08/14 11:47, 49F
→
08/14 12:52, , 50F
08/14 12:52, 50F
→
08/14 13:43, , 51F
08/14 13:43, 51F
推
08/14 15:28, , 52F
08/14 15:28, 52F
→
08/14 15:29, , 53F
08/14 15:29, 53F
→
08/14 15:29, , 54F
08/14 15:29, 54F
推
08/14 21:28, , 55F
08/14 21:28, 55F
推
11/10 19:24, , 56F
11/10 19:24, 56F
→
11/10 19:24, , 57F
11/10 19:24, 57F
→
11/10 19:30, , 58F
11/10 19:30, 58F
→
08/08 19:42, , 59F
08/08 19:42, 59F
→
09/11 13:12, , 60F
09/11 13:12, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
39
159
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
29
88
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 29 篇):
問題
8
12
問題
20
65
問題
28
45
問題
10
24
問題
1
9
問題
-9
72
問題
23
101
問題
9
32
問題
5
20
問題
1
1