[外電] SB★Nation之火箭隊季後賽特別報導(二)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SB★Nation之火箭隊季後賽特別報導(二)
Francisco Garcia will try to shoot the Rockets deep into the playoffs
By Patrick Harrel http://0rz.tw/iRgoz
At the trade deadline, the Rockets were nearly universally praised in landing
Thomas Robinson for just Patrick Patterson and friends, but most ignored
Francisco Garcia's inclusion into the deal.
After all, his presence in the trade seemed like nothing more than a salary
dump for the Maloofs and Garcia would be sitting behind Carlos Delfino
in the wing rotation.
A few weeks later, Garcia has emerged as a crucial bench cog for the Rockets
and his shooting has helped the Rockets more than once with Delfino and Parsons
on the bench with injuries. As the postseason approaches, what can Garcia bring?
The answer to that question will hopefully lie in this scouting report.
This article is the second in a series of ten where we look at each member of
the Rockets' rotation and evaluate them piece by piece.
The first piece can be found here, and we will be populating this page
(bookmark this!) with every article in the series.
Let's get started!
前言略,大意是說原本以為GARCIA是國王老闆MALOOFS所清出的爛約之一,
結果反倒是表現的比原先更被看好的T-ROB來的搶眼。
就讓我們來看看GARCIA到底有甚麼本是,以及能為火箭隊季後賽帶來些甚麼元素呢。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Offense *圖表一:http://0rz.tw/nfsjM
1) Knockdown Shooter with Bigtime Confidence and Bigtime Range
In short, Garcia is paid millions to shoot and he does it very well.
Garcia is not reckless by any stretch of the imagination with his shots,
but he is not afraid to put a shot up with a hand in his face.
In spot-up situations for the Rockets (short sample size alert),
Garcia is shooting over 45% from behind the arc, and he is shooting 42%
in shots that I charted as "well-contested."
Part of what makes Garcia such a threat is that though he has a propensity
to hit shots with hands in his face, he can also make them from anywhere
on the outside, hitting 37.7% or higher in every three point zone on the floor.
2) Almost Never Handles Ball or Turns Ball Over
As I said earlier, he's a shooter through and through, and doesn't try to do too much
with the ball. In some ways, this is what distinguishes Garcia from Carlos Delfino
who gets a bit overzealous at times, and Garcia's turnover rate reflects this.
He's top ten among shooting guards with just a 7.8% turnover rate.
In 310 possessions this season, Garcia has used just 13 for isolation plays and
16 for pick-and-rolls, both ranking extremely low in the NBA.
In short, he knows what he's good at, and he avoids trying too much.
On a team with ambitious young players, a wily old veteran who knows his limits
is pretty welcome.
進攻端
1) 擁有無範圍差別的關鍵時刻神射手
簡單來說,花了6M/Y的薪水請GARCIA來,
無疑就是要他的投射能力,而他也表現得很稱職。
GARCIA並不隨便輕易出手,但也並不懼怕在外線出手。
以定點跳投當統計基礎(在火箭隊的小樣品數)。
GARCIA有45%的外線出手來自於三分線,並有42%的命中率,
這顯示他是非常有競爭力的射手。
另一個造成GARCIA有如此威脅性的原因:
雖然他有外線出手的癖好,但恐怖的是他幾乎沒有攻擊死角。
最差的右邊45度角還有37.7%命中率,在其他角度甚至命中率更高!!
*圖表一:http://0rz.tw/nfsjM
2) 極少持球或者發生失誤的穩定性
理所當然的,一個射手並不需要持球過久。
但我們就拿隊上另一名功能性相同的DEFINO來做比較吧。
(DEFINO總是對於球權太過熱心 冏 )
以數據來看GARCIA他的失誤率TOV%只有7.8%,名列聯盟SG中前十佳。
(DEFINO"S TOV%:10.3%)
在本季310次進攻回合中,ISO只佔了13次,P&R只有16次,在聯盟排名都是極低的。
簡單來說,這名老將非常了解自己的優缺點,並盡量避免犯錯。
當一個充滿野心勃勃的少年仔的球隊中,
有一個經驗豐富,知道自己該做甚麼的老鳥很重要。
(DEFINO哥可以不要在帶球跟控球了嗎)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense
Defensively, I'm going to look at Garcia in a more broad sense than the
specific way I looked at Chandler Parsons yesterday, and that's because
his defense is not too difficult to describe.
Garcia is aging, and though he still has the basketball IQ that got him
a multimillion dollar contract a few years ago, his lateral movement
is fading.
Garcia struggles in isolation sets, giving up .9 PPP (points per possession)
on the season, good for 220th in the NBA, and is even worse in the pick-and-roll,
giving up 1.11 PPP, a figure which ranks 229th. He is however,
disciplined in help defense, with sharp rotations and quick recoveries,
allowing him to limit shooters while also playing good team defense.
For somebody who played most of his career in a tough environment in Sacramento,
that intelligence on the defensive side is fairly impressive.
防守端
在防守端上面,我會使用與檢視CP不同的,更廣義的角度來形容,因為那真的不難解釋。
GARCIA已經有點年紀了(32歲),但他仍有足夠的籃球智商讓他在幾年拿到6M/Y的合約
但他的橫向移動腳步已經漸漸地變的緩慢。
GARCIA的單防能力並不好,每一回合對手取得的分數 = PPP:0.9,僅列聯盟第220名。
而最糟糕的還在後頭,當他防守P&R時的失分PPP:1.11,聯盟第229名。
但他十分重視協防以及補位,讓他能夠限制住對方的射手,以及打好團隊防守。
以一名職業生涯長期待在NBA國王隊的他來說(如此惡劣的環境 好酸 冏),
他的防守智慧是非常讓人印象深刻的。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
Garcia is a weapon who teams will have to respect as he comes off the bench
in the playoffs for the Rockets.
He has a propensity to get hot from three point distance,
and will stabilize a bench offense full of young players.
He shoots consistently and judiciously, and tends to play within himself.
Defensively, he's not great in one-on-one situations,
but is great in a team scheme.
In short, he's a great bench player and he fills his role well.
As a throw-in in the trade deadline deal,
Garcia has done very well for the Rockets
and likely has earned himself a few bucks this summer.
結論
GARCIA擁有火箭隊在季後賽的板凳席上所重視的武器。
他有著火燙的三分外線手感與嗜好,又能夠帶著年輕的板凳群,穩定軍心與團隊防守。
或許他不是一個優秀的一對一防守者,但他絕對是一名傑出的團隊球員。
總而言之,他是一個GREAT板凳角色球員。
以交易截止日到現在的表現,他已給予火箭隊很大的幫助。(註:尤其CP跟DEFINO不在時)
或許他已經為自己在今年夏天贏得不錯的籌碼?! (有卦?!)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
編按:我個人很認同這篇文章,也非常喜歡這位老將(更甚於DEFINO)。
更穩定且範圍技的外線,知道自己該做甚麼不該做甚麼,
也跟DEFINO一樣打團隊籃球,常常激勵年輕的隊員。
現實面: 2013~2014
GARCIA 6.4M/Y
DEFINO 3M/Y
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
J.LIN#7 @ RedNation
Go Go ROCKETS!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.26.162.118
推
04/12 22:26, , 1F
04/12 22:26, 1F
推
04/12 22:26, , 2F
04/12 22:26, 2F
→
04/12 22:26, , 3F
04/12 22:26, 3F
→
04/12 22:29, , 4F
04/12 22:29, 4F
推
04/12 22:29, , 5F
04/12 22:29, 5F
→
04/12 22:30, , 6F
04/12 22:30, 6F
推
04/12 22:31, , 7F
04/12 22:31, 7F
推
04/12 22:33, , 8F
04/12 22:33, 8F
推
04/12 22:43, , 9F
04/12 22:43, 9F
→
04/12 22:43, , 10F
04/12 22:43, 10F
推
04/12 22:47, , 11F
04/12 22:47, 11F
推
04/12 22:56, , 12F
04/12 22:56, 12F
推
04/12 23:04, , 13F
04/12 23:04, 13F
推
04/12 23:08, , 14F
04/12 23:08, 14F
推
04/12 23:08, , 15F
04/12 23:08, 15F
→
04/12 23:09, , 16F
04/12 23:09, 16F
→
04/12 23:11, , 17F
04/12 23:11, 17F
推
04/12 23:12, , 18F
04/12 23:12, 18F
→
04/12 23:13, , 19F
04/12 23:13, 19F
推
04/12 23:20, , 20F
04/12 23:20, 20F
推
04/12 23:24, , 21F
04/12 23:24, 21F
推
04/12 23:26, , 22F
04/12 23:26, 22F
推
04/12 23:29, , 23F
04/12 23:29, 23F
→
04/12 23:35, , 24F
04/12 23:35, 24F
→
04/12 23:39, , 25F
04/12 23:39, 25F
→
04/12 23:57, , 26F
04/12 23:57, 26F
→
04/13 01:36, , 27F
04/13 01:36, 27F
推
04/13 05:38, , 28F
04/13 05:38, 28F
→
04/13 05:39, , 29F
04/13 05:39, 29F
→
04/13 05:39, , 30F
04/13 05:39, 30F
推
04/13 07:51, , 31F
04/13 07:51, 31F
推
04/13 08:04, , 32F
04/13 08:04, 32F
→
04/13 08:04, , 33F
04/13 08:04, 33F
→
04/13 08:05, , 34F
04/13 08:05, 34F
推
04/14 09:44, , 35F
04/14 09:44, 35F