[外電] 四方交易評論 By Kelly Dwyer

看板Rockets作者small2th ("We Are Red Nation")時間14年前 (2010/08/17 23:11)推噓8(9推 1噓 6→)

留言16則, 11人參與討論串1/1

A look at each side of the Hornets/Rockets/Nets/Pacers deal By Kelly Dwyer 原文：http://tinyurl.com/2bjef2r （這篇是Yahoo!一個專家對四方交易的評論，我只翻拿到Ariza的黃蜂部分和火箭部分）黃蜂部分 I don't like this deal for New Orleans. At all. 我真的不喜歡黃蜂做的這筆交易。 I appreciate the way Demps and the Hornets quieted the Paul noise very effectively. The Monty Williams hire was appropriate enough, the Jeff Bower firing (and usual embarrassing noise you get from ownership and front office types that I'm not going to even deign to name) was business as usual for fans that deserve so much more. And Demps seemed like a good, young guy to run with. 我很欣賞Demps這麼有效率就消除了CP3的不滿聲。請Monty Williams這教練也很適當。炒掉Jeff Bower（黃蜂老闆＆管理階層）也讓球迷很開心。Demps看起來很棒，未來無可限量。 But Ariza just isn't as nearly as good as teams keep making him out to be. There's a reason Houston was ready to dump the guy with only the suddenly-looking-much-older Shane Battier(notes) in reserve at small forward along with Chase Budinger(notes), only picking up a shooting guard that will have to find spot minutes behind Kevin Martin(notes). There's a reason Mitch Kupchak told Ariza to stick it, following his agent's laughable attempt at playing hardball with the Lakers last summer. 但隨著多隊都選擇讓Ariza離隊，Ariza看起來似乎沒那麼好。火箭的小前鋒只剩越來越老的八爺和二年級生布丁狗，在這情況下卻選擇交易Ariza換來一個KM的替補。Mitch去年夏天放掉放任經紀人玩把戲的Ariza，這些應該都有原因。 He's a great defender and purely a spot-up shooter that has shot 32 percent from long range over his career, 33 percent last year, 32 percent the year before that, and (wait for it) 47. 6 percent from behind the three-point during the 2009 playoffs; the lasting image before his free agent turn. Ariza is a fantastic athlete that can finish on the break, but he can't dribble, can't set up a good shot from inside the arc, and didn't really seem to understand this last season. Ariza是一個很棒的防守者，也是個定點射手，他生涯的三分命中率有32%，上季有33%，再上一季是32%。2009年的季後賽有47.6%。他有很棒的體能，可以完成快攻，但他不會運球，中距離也不好，而且似乎在上季還沒有明白這些。 I'm having a hard time thinking of a person whose shot selection was as poor as Ariza's last year. Maybe Kobe Bryant(notes), for some bad stretches, but then Kobe more than made up for that during the other 75 percent of the time by being Kobe. Ariza just shot and shot and shot and shot and never seemed to realize that players shooting a below-average 33.4 percent from deep shouldn't be taking 5.7 attempts a game, and players shooting 39.4 percent from the field shouldn't be shooting nearly 14 times a game. 我想了很久還是沒有想到在去年哪個人的出手選擇像 Ariza一樣差。或許在一些不好狀態時的Kobe算吧，但Kobe在大部分時間就是那個Kobe。而Ariza就是射阿射，射阿射，似乎從來不瞭解那些平均三分33.4%命中率以下的球員不應該出手每場出手5.7次，而投籃命中率 39.4%的球員也不應該每場出手快14次。 Which is why the Rockets had no issues dumping the guy for merely the relief of getting out from his contract; one that will pay him about $28 million total over the next four years. 這就是為什麼火箭沒有猶豫的就把Airza交易走藉此擺脫他的合約，一份剩餘4年約28M的合約。 And Demps traded Darren Collison for the rights to acquire this guy? This is absurdity. 而Demps為了這傢伙而送走了Darren Collison？這真是太荒謬了。 I had Collison ranked as the league's third-best rookie last year. We have no idea how the scoring-starved Hornets could work with Collison and Paul out there for long stretches of play under Williams (who paired Andre Miller(notes) and Steve Blake(notes) quite effectively last season), and in a worst-case scenario, Collison is a nice fallback option, rife with leverage, should Paul push this trade "demand" to even more ridiculous lengths. 我把Collison排在去年新秀裡第三優。我們還不知道在Williams手下會如何安排他跟CP3 的調度。但最差的狀況發生的話--CP3轉隊的事更加不可阻擋時，至少Collison是很好的備胎。 Really, all I'm ranking Ariza as is a sound upgrade over James Posey, who the Hornets also traded, at this point. He can start, and you have to look forward to a perimeter attack featuring Paul, Marcus Thornton(notes), and Ariza; but at this price? Such a diamond in the rough in Collison, and this is all you're getting for him? 說真的，我對於Ariza只看做是加強版的James Posey，他可以先發，跟CP3和Thornton組成很棒的外線攻擊連線。但花了這些代價？Collison這種剛磨亮的鑽石換走就只得到他？ Clearly, it bothers me. Mainly because I want Paul to work in New Orleans, and I want the Hornets to win in spite of their ownership. 這很顯然困擾了我。主要是因為我希望Paul留在紐澳良，我希望黃蜂可以有一番作為。 Trades in August and September? Those are the ones you talk yourselves into. Usually uncalled for, and nothing that wouldn't be worth waiting to February for. I've no doubt that Dell Demps figured out more about running an NBA team in his few years with San Antonio than I'll ever learn in a lifetime, but I can't help but feel that he stormed out of the gate with a big, fat miss. 你還告訴自己八月和九月還會有交易？我想在二月前大概都不會有動作。Demps在馬刺學到的或許比我這輩子學到的還多，但我還是忍不住覺得他捅了個大簍子。 *** 火箭部分 If 2009 was all about the plaudits, and 2009-10 was all about a plucky team of his creation keeping it competitive despite losing the services of their two highest-paid players, then the summer of 2010 has been all about admitting to mistakes for Rockets GM Daryl Morey. 如果2009年值得不斷讚揚，09-10年在少了隊上薪水最高的兩個球員還打的有聲有色，那 2010的夏天Morey所做的動作都顯示他承認錯誤。 Not huge mistakes - both David Andersen(notes) and Trevor Ariza contributed to a team that stayed tough all season without a healthy Yao Ming(notes) or Tracy McGrady(notes) around to help - and the Rockets weren't really put out to pasture asset-wise in pulling in Andersen and Ariza. Andersen came cheap, for picks, and played cheaply. Ariza essentially filled in the mid-level role Ron Artest(notes) used to work in. But if either remained on the roster beyond this year, than they would have spiraled into bigger mistakes. Both had to split. 也不是什麼大錯啦--就是送走了在MM缺陣下貢獻良多的D.Andersen和Ariza，而火箭在當時弄來這兩人也沒花到多大的代價。DA很便宜的用選秀權就換到了，而Ariza就用中產就填補了阿泰原來的角色。但要是繼續持有他們，這兩人就會變成更大的錯誤，所以兩個都要處理。 And this week, Ariza split. For New Orleans, and as a result of Houston's role in the four-team deal, the Rockets get Courtney Lee(notes) from New Jersey as a result. And, again, the downturn in talent from Ariza to Lee is all about making up for a mistake. 而這禮拜Ariza就在四方交易中換去黃蜂，得到了Lee。不惜讓天分下降就只為了消除掉錯誤。 Because Lee just isn't a starter at this level, and the point of this transaction was to clear Ariza's shot-happy ways from the Houston rotation, and clear off the guaranteed $28 million and four years Trevor has left on his contract. If the Rockets aren't quite smitten with Lee's game, they could just have him around for the last guaranteed year of his rookie contract, paying him over $1.3 million this year before letting the former Magic and Net defender go. Lee還不是先發的水準，所以重點在於可以讓Ariza的爽爽浪投不要再出現在休士頓，並清掉他那有保障的28M四年約。如果火箭覺得Lee打的很爛，他可以直接處理掉他的新人約。 More than likely, though, they'll keep him around for 2011-12 with a team option at over $2.25 million, and take in good-enough production for that rate. He's a defender who can back up Kevin Martin, while occasionally hitting the outside shot. Lee is going to be 25 this fall, so he is what he is despite it just being his third year in the NBA; and it's a nice asset to have in a deal that was all about losing Ariza's contract. 更可能的是，他們執行11-12的球隊選項，2.25M是很超值的。他是一個可以支援KM的好防守者，也有不錯的外線，他在這個秋天就是個25歲的三年級生，可以說Ariza的合約換來不錯的資產。 Not an easy move to dump a starting small forward, especially with Shane Battier looking every bit of his 31 years last season (he turns 32 next month). But in Martin, Battier, Lee and Chase Budinger the Rockets have a good wing rotation, alongside a scoring point in Aaron Brooks(notes) and what will at times look like (though it won't consistently be) the best center and power forward tandem in the NBA next season. 要做出送走先發小前鋒的決定並不容易，特別在八爺又要老一歲的情況下。不過看看有 KM、八爺、Lee和布丁狗，加上小AB和明年「看起來」是最佳的PF和C搭檔，下一季火箭擁有很優質的輪替。 The Rockets are lucky to get out of Ariza's deal before he shoots himself into every other team finally realizing what sort of player he actually is, but it should be noted they needed a little of what he brought last year. As bad as Ariza's shots were, they needed someone to put those shots up and send people to the glass last year, and while this sounds like damning with faint praise, understand just what a weird year that was for Houston last year; going from a 7-6 to 6-6 center and wondering just how in the hell they were going to get to 75 points on some nights (or stop other teams from scoring 175 on others). 火箭很幸運的在Ariza「名不符實」的身手還沒在聯盟傳開的情況下就脫手他了，但他們去年的確需要Ariza。既然他的投籃這麼差，他們就應該找個可以拉下那些籃板再把他們放回去的人。這聽起來有點風涼話啦，但要瞭解到上季火箭是多麼奇特的一年：中鋒從7-6變成6-6，有些晚上不知道在幹嘛的只拿到75分（或是被得個175分...） Houston dodged a bullet with Ariza, so they save a little face in this situation. Artest-to-Ariza-to-Lee isn't exactly selling high, but the Rockets are still full of assets and Lee will fit in. 休士頓當時因為Ariza而算躲過一劫，所以他們能夠保留一些顏面。從阿泰到Ariza再到 Lee，火箭不算賺，但火箭還是擁有充足的資產，而Lee也將融入其中。 Ariza's contract is a poor deal, to be sure, because he failed to realize his limitations and shot away like a franchise player. But Houston got rid of him before the Hornets got wise, and they should at least be credited for that. 確定的是，Ariza的合約是個爛約，因為他無法理解自己的極限，仍舊打法像是個一哥。但火箭在黃蜂變的聰明前就把他丟給黃蜂了，至少他們應該為此被稱讚。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.173.136.127

推

youngstory

08/17 23:32, , 1^F

08/17 23:32, 1^F

推

Websphere

08/18 00:20, , 2^F

08/18 00:20, 2^F

推

tamataco

08/18 01:30, , 3^F

08/18 01:30, 3^F