[新聞] A Look at the Red Sox Payroll in 2010
By Alex Speier
On Friday, Red Sox CEO Larry Lucchino sounded a note of some defiance about
his team's commitment to the 2010 season. He insisted their financial
investment in winning would remain undiminished in the coming season.
執行長 Larry Lucchino 強調紅襪在未來球季的財務投資不會縮水
“Our payroll has not gone down the last two years. The newspapers may report
that our payroll has gone down the last two years, but that is just not
accurate. And our payroll will be higher this year,” Lucchino said on the
Dennis & Callahan Show.
「我們的 payroll 過去兩年並未下降。可能有報導指出這兩年來是下降,這並不準確。
而且今年球季 payroll 將會更高」
“We don't discuss publicly what our payroll is, because we think there's a
competitive disadvantage in telling the other teams in our division and our
league what we're going to spend and not spend because they may be able to
do some guesses and calculations about how active we'll be in the market.
We're always pleased when other teams announce that they're payroll will be X
or Y, and we just sit quietly and don't say anything. But it is inaccurate
to say our payroll has gone down, and our payroll will go up this year.”
「我們不會公開討論 payroll 是多少,告知同分區和同聯盟的其他球隊我們的還有
多少金額可以花用是競爭的不利因素,因為對方可以猜測、估算我們在市場的動作。
我們總是樂意聽到其他球隊宣佈他們的 payroll 是多少,但我們不透漏任何訊息。
但這也說不準我們的 payroll 會是增加或是減少。」
(編按:這兩段是在自打嘴巴嗎...)
總經理 Theo Epstein 在冬季會議上表示
“There's some things we want to do this winter,” said Epstein,
“and we don't have a ton of room under the [competitive balance tax].”
這冬天要有所動作,但也得考慮豪華稅,而今年 CBT 門檻從 $162M 上升到 $170M。
經由一些實際數字,預期紅襪今年 offseason 後 Payroll 會衝上這門檻。
要先留意到一個誤解:
2009 的 Payroll 算出來是 $122M,與 CBT 門檻距離甚遠。這表示用開季時的
roster 名單計算的薪資無法反應出實際開銷,像是 Smoltz、Saito 的激勵獎金
或是季中交易來的 Martinez、Martinez 和 Wagner。
所以 2009 年紅襪的 Payroll 遠高於 $122M,根據一個大聯盟消息來源:超過 $150M
在簽下 Marco Scutaro、Mike Cameron 和 John Lackey 之後,已經很接近這門檻
基於非正式的 40 人名單薪資估算,紅襪 2010 的 CBT Payroll 大約在 $165-170M
這已經表示紅襪明年將會是大聯盟史上最貴的球隊 - 洋基除外。
如果現在紅襪簽了 Adrian Beltre 一年 $10-12M,將付出額外 $2M 的豪華稅
但這也不表示紅襪這個冬天就不再有動作,相反地,球隊顯示出以往沒有過的購買慾
(編按:其實我也沒有很懂...有錯請指正)
Red Sox 2010 Payroll (Calculated for Luxury Tax Purposes)
http://www.weei.com/sites/default/files/pictures/121509_2010payroll2.jpg

Also known as the luxury tax, its meant by Major League Baseball as a
deterrent to spending. The Collective Bargaining Agreement between the
Players Association and MLB owners defines a payroll level beyond which teams
will be taxed for their spending.
In 2010, the CBT threshold increases from $162 million to $170 million. As a
result of that substantial number, many anticipated the Sox might go berserk
in dispensing cash this offseason.
This perception was based in part on a misunderstanding: the Sox have been
portrayed as having carried a $122 million payroll in 2009, and so the idea
that the team would near the CBT threshold seemed outlandish. But that $122
million figure had nothing to do with the Sox’ payroll as calculated for CBT
purposes.
Instead, it represented the combined Opening Day base salaries of the 25-man
roster (and players on the disabled list). It failed to reflect millions in
incentives that would be earned by the likes of John Smoltz and Takashi
Saito, or millions more spent on mid-season acquisitions such as Victor
Martinez, Alex Gonzalez and Billy Wagner. Nor did that figure account for the
roughly $10 million that teams must spend every year on benefits.
So, the 2009 Red Sox payroll was far greater than the $122 million figure.
For CBT purposes, the Sox, according to one major-league source, had a
payroll in excess of $150 million.
Now, the Sox have already been big players in the offseason market. But their
one major move for Lackey and two complementary moves for Marco Scutaro and
Mike Cameron have already pushed the Sox near the CBT threshold that Epstein
suggested the Sox were approaching with caution.
Right now, the Red Sox CBT payroll for next season — based on informal
projections of salaries for players on the 40-man roster whose salaries are
not yet set — seems likely to check in around $165-170 million.
That would already mean that next year's Red Sox will represent the most
expensive assemblage of talent by a non-Yankees team in big-league history.
The previous mark was owned by the Sox' World Series winning team of 2007,
which had a $163.1 million payroll (as calculated for CBT purposes). That
season, the team was hit with a luxury tax of roughly $6 million for clearing
that year’s $148 million CBT threshold.
Now, with the big-ticket free-agent signings of Lackey and Cameron, the Sox
are at or near the point at which they’ll start to be penalized for any
further spending on players. That prospect, in turn, has implications for
anything else the Sox might do this offseason.
The Sox, after not having paid the luxury tax the last two years, would be
subject to a 22.5 percent penalty for payroll over $170 million in 2010. As
such, the cost of any further acquisitions would become steeper. Were the Sox
to sign a player like Adrian Beltre for $10-12 million a year, they’d have
to pay more than $2 million extra in luxury tax.
That is not a guarantee that the Sox are done with their moves this
offseason. But, the tax that will be assessed on any additional signings this
offseason will at least give the Sox pause before making more moves.
If nothing else, the current franchise-record commitments give a sense of why
the Sox might bristle at suggestions that they have scaled back. To the
contrary, the team appears to be spending like never before.
http://tinyurl.com/y9ah7oe
--
t a ╭◢ ═ ◣╮ ╭ ◣ ═══◢◆ ════ ◢█◣ ◢█◣ theanswer3
h n ║█ █ ╰═════╯ █ ● █ ● ◢█◣ █ █ █◥█ ◢╱◥╴║
e s ║█◣ █▌◢█◣ ◢ ◢ █◢◤ ◣ █ ◣ ◥◣◥ ◢◤ █ █ ∠\▋▆ ║
w ║◥██ ◤█▌█ █◢█ ██◣ █ █ █ ◣◥◣ ◢◤ █◣█ ║
e ║ █▌ ◥█◤ ◥◤◥ █ ◥ ◥ █ ◥ ◥█◤ ███ ◥█◤ << ║
r 3╰═◢ ◤════════◥ ═══◆◤════════════════╯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.67.90
推
12/16 16:40, , 1F
12/16 16:40, 1F
推
12/16 17:01, , 2F
12/16 17:01, 2F
→
12/16 17:06, , 3F
12/16 17:06, 3F
→
12/16 17:27, , 4F
12/16 17:27, 4F
推
12/16 18:26, , 5F
12/16 18:26, 5F
推
12/16 18:55, , 6F
12/16 18:55, 6F
推
12/16 19:03, , 7F
12/16 19:03, 7F
→
12/16 19:04, , 8F
12/16 19:04, 8F
→
12/16 19:05, , 9F
12/16 19:05, 9F
→
12/16 19:08, , 10F
12/16 19:08, 10F
推
12/16 19:14, , 11F
12/16 19:14, 11F
推
12/16 20:09, , 12F
12/16 20:09, 12F
→
12/16 20:10, , 13F
12/16 20:10, 13F
推
12/16 20:29, , 14F
12/16 20:29, 14F
推
12/16 20:44, , 15F
12/16 20:44, 15F
→
12/16 20:58, , 16F
12/16 20:58, 16F
推
12/16 21:29, , 17F
12/16 21:29, 17F
→
12/16 21:30, , 18F
12/16 21:30, 18F
→
12/16 21:32, , 19F
12/16 21:32, 19F
推
12/16 22:07, , 20F
12/16 22:07, 20F
推
12/16 22:13, , 21F
12/16 22:13, 21F
推
12/17 02:41, , 22F
12/17 02:41, 22F
→
12/17 02:41, , 23F
12/17 02:41, 23F
推
12/17 23:13, , 24F
12/17 23:13, 24F
※ 編輯: Belladonaa 來自: 118.160.70.225 (12/19 01:32)