[情報] Teixeira’s Potential Impact on the Red Sox
I’ve already stated my support for the Red Sox going after Mark Teixeira
based mainly on the fact that Boston has a bunch payroll room and he’s one
of the top players on the market. But with Mike Lowell, Kevin Youkilis, and
David Ortiz already on the team, it’s hard to figure how Teixeira will make
sense financially. With that question in mind, I took a quick and dirty look
at one possible scenario (the most likely one in my mind)--Teixeira is being
brought in to replace Mike Lowell. Here’s what I found.
Without, Teixeira, Youkilis would presumably play 1B and assuming he’s
healthy, Lowell would play 3B. Their values break down like this (values from
Fangraphs, projections on offense are an average of Bill James and Marcel,
defense is Fangraphs’ UZR with a 3/2/1 + 2 parts regression to the mean,
adjusted for playing time and aging a bit too, positional adjustments are
Tango’s):
Youk at 1B: +20 wRAA, +4 UZR, - 12.5 positional adjustment, +20 (above
replacement level) = 31.5 runs above replacement
Lowell at 3B (~130 g): +2.6 wRAA, +7 UZR, +2 positional adjustment, +17
(above replacement level) = 28.6 runs above replacement
Total: ~60 Runs above replacement
Now here’s now it looks with Tex coming in to play 1B and Youk moving to 3B:
Teixeira at 1B: +33 wRAA, +1 UZR, - 12.5 positional adjustment, +20 (above
replacement level) = 41.5 runs above replacement
Youk at 3B: +20 wRAA, +9 UZR, +2.5 positional adjustment, +20 (above
replacement level) = 51.5 runs above replacement
Total: ~93 Runs above replacement
Total improvement: ~33 runs
Looking at these numbers, the Red Sox gain a good chunk by replacing Lowell
with a superior player in Teixeira. But that’s not the only effect. They
also magically turn Youkilis from a very good player into a great
one--another Mark Teixeira, only better! I guess great players really do make
others around them better! Much of this improvement stems from the positional
adjustment of 15 runs, but if you look at the bolded #s, UZR also grades
Youkilis better as a 3B than as a 1B, even though you’d normally expect the
opposite. The 3B numbers are based on only 450 innings over the past 3 years,
an extremely small sample, but it should be noted that in almost 1100 career
innings at 3B, Youk is at +13.9/150 UZR.
Assuming that the Youkilis numbers are correct, the Red Sox gain about 3.3
wins in 2009 by adding Teixeira (and presumably similar amounts in the years
that follow as he, Lowell, and Youkilis age). The $20 mil/year that Tex is
expected to receive is a steep price for 3.3 wins in a market where wins
usually go for ~$4.6 mil each. But--there are a few “buts” to consider.
1) The Red Sox have room in their payroll and there aren’t a ton of other
areas in which they could improve. Paying $6 mil/win is not a bad result
for them.
2) There’s a strong possibility that Lowell’s injury knocks a good chunk
off his expected production, particularly on defense. That could easily
make Tex a 4 win improvement on this team.
3) If Lowell is healthy, he could be traded, with the Red Sox not having to
pay is full salary. If they even unload half of his salary, that’s
$6 mil/year, making the cost of replacing him with Teixeira, closer to
$14 mi/year for 3.3 wins--a very reasonable $4.2 mil/win.
All of these add up to the Teixeira deal making a good bit of sense for the
Red Sox, whether Mike Lowell is healthy or injured. He’s an extremely good
player, and although it seems weird to be paying a 1B that much, he appears
to be worth it.
PS. Happy holidays and please nobody tell Youkilis how valuable he is as a
3B. I’d like him to sign a cheap 3-4 year deal with the Sox.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.70.127
→
12/20 12:19, , 1F
12/20 12:19, 1F
→
12/20 12:21, , 2F
12/20 12:21, 2F
→
12/20 12:23, , 3F
12/20 12:23, 3F
→
12/20 12:24, , 4F
12/20 12:24, 4F
→
12/20 12:26, , 5F
12/20 12:26, 5F
→
12/20 12:33, , 6F
12/20 12:33, 6F
→
12/20 12:35, , 7F
12/20 12:35, 7F
推
12/20 13:22, , 8F
12/20 13:22, 8F
推
12/20 13:22, , 9F
12/20 13:22, 9F
推
12/20 15:18, , 10F
12/20 15:18, 10F
推
12/20 16:42, , 11F
12/20 16:42, 11F
推
12/20 18:20, , 12F
12/20 18:20, 12F
→
12/20 18:27, , 13F
12/20 18:27, 13F
推
12/20 18:28, , 14F
12/20 18:28, 14F
→
12/20 18:31, , 15F
12/20 18:31, 15F
推
12/20 19:34, , 16F
12/20 19:34, 16F
推
12/20 22:09, , 17F
12/20 22:09, 17F
推
12/20 22:30, , 18F
12/20 22:30, 18F
→
12/20 22:32, , 19F
12/20 22:32, 19F
推
12/20 22:34, , 20F
12/20 22:34, 20F
推
12/20 23:59, , 21F
12/20 23:59, 21F
→
12/21 00:00, , 22F
12/21 00:00, 22F
推
12/21 00:09, , 23F
12/21 00:09, 23F
→
12/21 00:10, , 24F
12/21 00:10, 24F
→
12/21 00:34, , 25F
12/21 00:34, 25F
→
12/21 00:35, , 26F
12/21 00:35, 26F
推
12/21 01:54, , 27F
12/21 01:54, 27F
→
12/21 01:55, , 28F
12/21 01:55, 28F
→
12/21 08:31, , 29F
12/21 08:31, 29F
→
12/21 08:32, , 30F
12/21 08:32, 30F
→
12/21 12:43, , 31F
12/21 12:43, 31F
→
12/28 20:27,
5年前
, 32F
12/28 20:27, 32F