[新聞] The Buchholz Dilemma

看板RedSox作者 ( )時間17年前 (2007/09/06 17:35), 編輯推噓2(207)
留言9則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The Buchholz Dilemma It is strange to see a pitcher be sent to the bullpen after throwing a no-hitter, but that's exactly what has happened with Clay Buchholz. Tim Wakefield will be able to make his next start, so Buchholz's next appearance will be in relief. Well, that's not really the reason. In a perfect world, Francona would love for him to start every fifth day for the next four weeks. However, it is clear that Boston has their priorities straight in terms of protecting their best prospect's right arm (from FanHouse)" "It's been proven with young pitchers if you're increasing their (yearly) increments too much, you're putting them unnecessarily at risk," [Terry] Francona said. "We don't want to do that." Last year, at the age of 21, Buchholz threw 119 innings over 24 starts in A ball. Here's his line so far this year.(數據請看原文網頁) So that's 141 innings so far this year, 22 more than '06. Now another Francona quote from this Yahoo article: "What we'll do with Clay is try to get him on structured innings and out of the bullpen. That doesn't mean he won't start a game again. (It's) because of organizational philosophy, caring about innings, developmental innings, major league innings." The Red Sox have to do what they're doing right now. You can't be putting more innings on this kid's arm with a six game lead and 99.988% chance of making the playoffs. That wouldn't make any sense. But October is a whole different animal. The difference between advancing and getting eliminated is so tiny, teams can't afford to hold anything back. And if they don't have Buchholz in their rotation, the Red Sox would be doing exactly that. From Nate Silver's fascinating Unfiltered post on BP: "Skipping a bunch of math, and assuming that Buchholz or Wakefield would be slotted in as the #4 starter — #4 starters generally make about 17% of their team’s playoff starts — the way this translates is that the Red Sox increase their chances of winning a 5-game series against a .600 opponent from .581 to .641 if Buchholz starts instead of Wakefield, and their chances of winning a 7-game series from .608 to .644. Accordingly, they increase their chance of winning the World Series from .215 to .255 — about a 4% jump." Silver goes on to explain just how significant a 4% jump is- it's the equivalent of adding a five win player for two season, which would probably cost a team about $25MM. Looking at it in this light, it seems like it would be insane for the Red Sox to not start Buchholz in October just to save a few innings from his arm. It seems like a risk they have to take. And maybe they will. Regardless of what their plans are for October, this is what they would have done. Either way, it's not a good risk to have Buchholz starting games in September for a team with a comfortable lead. But taking advantage of an asset like Buchholz in the playoffs is a necessity. Hopefully, Theo Epstein has been reading BP (entirely possible), and we'll get to see Buchholz's encore about four weeks from now. Stats taken from Baseball-Reference (now with minor league stats!). Pictures taken from here and here. Posted by Vegas Watch at 12:18 AM Labels: Buchholz, Francona, Red Sox From:http://vegaswatch.blogspot.com/2007/09/buchholz-dilemma.html -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.230.21.183

09/06 18:08, , 1F
it seems like it would be insane for the
09/06 18:08, 1F

09/06 18:08, , 2F
Red Sox to not start Buchholz in October
09/06 18:08, 2F

09/06 18:09, , 3F
嘖嘖~
09/06 18:09, 3F

09/06 18:09, , 4F
2002天使的K-Rod嗎? 哈哈~
09/06 18:09, 4F

09/06 20:33, , 5F
保護 Buchholz 的手臂 比增加那一點
09/06 20:33, 5F

09/06 20:34, , 6F
季後賽贏球的勝率 我覺得前者重要
09/06 20:34, 6F

09/06 20:35, , 7F
再者老魏今年一直都是個稱職 #4
09/06 20:35, 7F

09/06 20:36, , 8F
所以雖然粉柯南常常腦殘 這點我會支持
09/06 20:36, 8F

09/06 20:37, , 9F
把 Buchholz 放到牛棚
09/06 20:37, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #16tydbQQ (RedSox)