[問題] 妖術該重視MATK否?
會這樣想是因為看貓窩公式..幾個三轉大法都是固定倍率+INT乘算
完全沒有MATK的部份在內
例如超自然波:
MATK倍率:( 350+INT*3 )%*(baseLv/100)。
以baseLv150,INT150為例,7HIT總8400%。
那麼武器選擇上以單手高I為主就好?..像是克羅杖就沒用處?
不過貓窩魔法傷害計算機MATK還是會有影響..so請教實際妖術玩家解答
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.36.239.138
推
05/01 17:02, , 1F
05/01 17:02, 1F
推
05/01 17:02, , 2F
05/01 17:02, 2F
推
05/01 17:09, , 3F
05/01 17:09, 3F
→
05/01 17:20, , 4F
05/01 17:20, 4F
→
05/01 17:22, , 5F
05/01 17:22, 5F
→
05/01 17:23, , 6F
05/01 17:23, 6F
→
05/01 17:34, , 7F
05/01 17:34, 7F
→
05/01 17:40, , 8F
05/01 17:40, 8F
推
05/01 17:41, , 9F
05/01 17:41, 9F
→
05/01 17:42, , 10F
05/01 17:42, 10F
→
05/01 17:43, , 11F
05/01 17:43, 11F
→
05/01 17:46, , 12F
05/01 17:46, 12F
→
05/01 17:47, , 13F
05/01 17:47, 13F
→
05/01 17:47, , 14F
05/01 17:47, 14F
推
05/01 17:57, , 15F
05/01 17:57, 15F
→
05/01 17:59, , 16F
05/01 17:59, 16F
→
05/01 18:02, , 17F
05/01 18:02, 17F
推
05/01 19:02, , 18F
05/01 19:02, 18F
推
05/01 20:12, , 19F
05/01 20:12, 19F
→
05/01 20:12, , 20F
05/01 20:12, 20F
推
05/01 20:49, , 21F
05/01 20:49, 21F
→
05/01 21:12, , 22F
05/01 21:12, 22F
推
05/01 21:14, , 23F
05/01 21:14, 23F
推
05/01 21:17, , 24F
05/01 21:17, 24F
→
05/01 21:17, , 25F
05/01 21:17, 25F
→
05/01 21:19, , 26F
05/01 21:19, 26F
推
05/01 21:20, , 27F
05/01 21:20, 27F
→
05/01 21:20, , 28F
05/01 21:20, 28F
→
05/01 21:27, , 29F
05/01 21:27, 29F
推
05/01 21:32, , 30F
05/01 21:32, 30F
→
05/01 21:35, , 31F
05/01 21:35, 31F
→
05/01 21:38, , 32F
05/01 21:38, 32F
→
05/01 21:38, , 33F
05/01 21:38, 33F
推
05/01 21:52, , 34F
05/01 21:52, 34F
推
05/01 21:52, , 35F
05/01 21:52, 35F
推
05/01 21:53, , 36F
05/01 21:53, 36F
推
05/01 21:53, , 37F
05/01 21:53, 37F
推
05/01 21:53, , 38F
05/01 21:53, 38F
推
05/01 21:54, , 39F
05/01 21:54, 39F
→
05/01 21:54, , 40F
05/01 21:54, 40F
推
05/01 22:07, , 41F
05/01 22:07, 41F
推
05/01 22:09, , 42F
05/01 22:09, 42F
→
05/01 22:11, , 43F
05/01 22:11, 43F
→
05/01 22:12, , 44F
05/01 22:12, 44F
推
05/01 22:15, , 45F
05/01 22:15, 45F
→
05/01 22:16, , 46F
05/01 22:16, 46F
→
05/01 22:18, , 47F
05/01 22:18, 47F
→
05/01 22:20, , 48F
05/01 22:20, 48F
→
05/01 22:26, , 49F
05/01 22:26, 49F
→
05/02 00:08, , 50F
05/02 00:08, 50F
推
05/02 10:09, , 51F
05/02 10:09, 51F
→
05/02 10:10, , 52F
05/02 10:10, 52F
推
05/02 10:15, , 53F
05/02 10:15, 53F