[新聞] 三歲女童遭性侵喊不要 最高院:無法證實違意願
2010-09-01 新聞速報 轉載自 【中時電子報/綜合報導】
又是一起引發爭議的判例。一名被告涉嫌性侵三歲女童,一、二審法
官都以當時女童高喊「不要」,認定違反女童意願予以重判,不料最高法
院竟然以女童「無法證明違反其意願」為由,將全案撤銷發回更審。不滿
民眾大罵,「難道法官期待三歲小孩說:我不要『被性侵』嗎?」
這起爭議案件發生在2006年,一名吳姓男子將友人家的女童載回住處
後就伸出魔爪,女童哭喊「不要」,卻因年幼仍遭性侵得逞。事後女童母
親發現孩子下體紅腫,女童又指證歷歷,憤怒報警。
檢警表示,吳姓男子否認性侵,但未通過測謊,高雄地院及高分院都
認定吳男違反女童意願性侵,二審重判吳姓男子七年兩個月徒刑,並且要
其接受強制治療。
不料全案到了最高法院,法官認為女童的證詞,「無法證明被告違反
其意願」,因此將全案撤銷,發回更審,並要二審酌量輕判。
這項判例傳出後,引發網友痛批,認為法官的判例,等於變相鼓勵性
侵幼童,實在令人無法接受,法理情的爭議風暴,又再浮現。
○ 因為前篇筆戰過多...另行再PO文...當作新聞看看吧!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.127.110.119
→
09/14 09:51, , 1F
09/14 09:51, 1F
推
09/14 10:42, , 2F
09/14 10:42, 2F
推
09/14 10:57, , 3F
09/14 10:57, 3F
→
09/14 12:46, , 4F
09/14 12:46, 4F
推
09/14 13:31, , 5F
09/14 13:31, 5F
推
09/14 14:19, , 6F
09/14 14:19, 6F
→
09/14 15:59, , 7F
09/14 15:59, 7F
推
09/14 16:10, , 8F
09/14 16:10, 8F
→
09/14 16:12, , 9F
09/14 16:12, 9F
→
09/14 16:52, , 10F
09/14 16:52, 10F
→
09/14 16:53, , 11F
09/14 16:53, 11F
→
09/14 17:02, , 12F
09/14 17:02, 12F
→
09/14 17:32, , 13F
09/14 17:32, 13F
→
09/14 17:33, , 14F
09/14 17:33, 14F
→
09/14 20:01, , 15F
09/14 20:01, 15F
→
09/14 20:09, , 16F
09/14 20:09, 16F
→
09/14 20:10, , 17F
09/14 20:10, 17F
→
09/14 20:43, , 18F
09/14 20:43, 18F
→
09/14 20:47, , 19F
09/14 20:47, 19F
推
09/14 20:54, , 20F
09/14 20:54, 20F
→
09/14 20:55, , 21F
09/14 20:55, 21F
→
09/14 20:55, , 22F
09/14 20:55, 22F
→
09/14 20:56, , 23F
09/14 20:56, 23F
→
09/14 20:56, , 24F
09/14 20:56, 24F
推
09/14 20:57, , 25F
09/14 20:57, 25F
→
09/14 20:58, , 26F
09/14 20:58, 26F
→
09/14 20:59, , 27F
09/14 20:59, 27F
→
09/14 21:00, , 28F
09/14 21:00, 28F
→
09/14 21:01, , 29F
09/14 21:01, 29F
→
09/14 21:01, , 30F
09/14 21:01, 30F
→
09/14 22:07, , 31F
09/14 22:07, 31F
推
09/14 23:09, , 32F
09/14 23:09, 32F
推
09/15 13:11, , 33F
09/15 13:11, 33F