[討論] 台灣人力市場很矛盾的一些現象...
資方總是說:
哀哟~都開了很好的待遇啦,也真的需要不少人力開出不少缺啊~可是都沒有人要來!!
(然後就開始順便嫌年輕人眼高手低草莓族之類的...)
那這樣講代表台灣的勞動就業市場普遍應是供不應求,對吧?
而近年的少子化、高齡化社會等等社會統計,數據上也證實台灣的可用勞動力的確在減少
可是呢~又很常聽到公司的人資部門、10X/1XX1奴隸銀行等、和審履歷的主管等在說:
一個職缺都好多人應徵,第一階段就要砍十分之一,第二階段再砍到剩下三分之一...
BLABLA的,一副"大家搶著做"的樣子,老闆fire人的時候也常嗆
"你不爽做後面一堆人等著做" -----> 但這又顯示勞動力供過於求?
怎麼可能一個小小島國人力市場,會有兩種狀況? 所以一定是有其中一方在說謊吧?
到底是哪一方的主張是膨風吹牛的?? 目前台灣現況到底是事求人做、還是人求事做?
若是前者,那X老闆們就算不願提高待遇求才留才,又為何還要維持過高的徵人篩汰比率?
若是後者,職缺釋出時搶破頭的現象屬實,那就表示本國人力就很夠用了,
光靠本勞彼此間的過度惡性競爭,自砍薪水價碼就足夠降下可觀的成本,甚至抵過用外勞
那為何又整天吵著要政府開放外勞勒?
我怎麼想都覺得... 一定有一方的論述是假的是在說謊吧,不然根本不合理
大家覺得呢?
--
推
01/04 00:43,
01/04 00:43
推
01/04 00:44,
01/04 00:44
→
01/04 00:44,
01/04 00:44
→
01/04 00:44,
01/04 00:44
推
01/04 00:44,
01/04 00:44
→
01/04 00:44,
01/04 00:44
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.26.174.10
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1441896914.A.C39.html
※ 編輯: GzuegeLiang (114.26.174.10), 09/10/2015 22:57:45
→
09/11 00:09, , 1F
09/11 00:09, 1F
→
09/11 00:09, , 2F
09/11 00:09, 2F
→
09/11 00:09, , 3F
09/11 00:09, 3F
→
09/11 00:10, , 4F
09/11 00:10, 4F
→
09/11 00:32, , 5F
09/11 00:32, 5F
我主要是想問
台灣整體產業界的平均狀況
→
09/11 01:00, , 6F
09/11 01:00, 6F
→
09/11 01:01, , 7F
09/11 01:01, 7F
※ 編輯: GzuegeLiang (114.26.174.10), 09/11/2015 01:02:20
→
09/11 01:10, , 8F
09/11 01:10, 8F
→
09/11 01:10, , 9F
09/11 01:10, 9F
→
09/11 01:11, , 10F
09/11 01:11, 10F
→
09/11 01:12, , 11F
09/11 01:12, 11F
→
09/11 01:13, , 12F
09/11 01:13, 12F
→
09/11 01:13, , 13F
09/11 01:13, 13F
→
09/11 01:13, , 14F
09/11 01:13, 14F
→
09/11 01:14, , 15F
09/11 01:14, 15F
→
09/11 01:15, , 16F
09/11 01:15, 16F
→
09/11 01:16, , 17F
09/11 01:16, 17F
→
09/11 01:17, , 18F
09/11 01:17, 18F
→
09/11 01:17, , 19F
09/11 01:17, 19F
→
09/11 01:18, , 20F
09/11 01:18, 20F
→
09/11 01:18, , 21F
09/11 01:18, 21F
→
09/11 01:18, , 22F
09/11 01:18, 22F
→
09/11 01:19, , 23F
09/11 01:19, 23F
→
09/11 01:20, , 24F
09/11 01:20, 24F
→
09/11 01:22, , 25F
09/11 01:22, 25F
→
09/11 01:22, , 26F
09/11 01:22, 26F
→
09/11 01:22, , 27F
09/11 01:22, 27F
→
09/11 01:24, , 28F
09/11 01:24, 28F
→
09/11 01:24, , 29F
09/11 01:24, 29F
→
09/11 01:25, , 30F
09/11 01:25, 30F
→
09/11 01:25, , 31F
09/11 01:25, 31F
→
09/11 01:26, , 32F
09/11 01:26, 32F
→
09/11 01:26, , 33F
09/11 01:26, 33F
→
09/11 01:27, , 34F
09/11 01:27, 34F
→
09/11 01:27, , 35F
09/11 01:27, 35F
→
09/11 01:28, , 36F
09/11 01:28, 36F
→
09/11 01:29, , 37F
09/11 01:29, 37F
→
09/11 01:29, , 38F
09/11 01:29, 38F
→
09/11 01:29, , 39F
09/11 01:29, 39F
→
09/11 01:30, , 40F
09/11 01:30, 40F
→
09/11 01:31, , 41F
09/11 01:31, 41F
→
09/11 01:32, , 42F
09/11 01:32, 42F
→
09/11 01:32, , 43F
09/11 01:32, 43F
推
09/11 01:34, , 44F
09/11 01:34, 44F
→
09/11 01:35, , 45F
09/11 01:35, 45F
→
09/11 01:35, , 46F
09/11 01:35, 46F
→
09/11 01:37, , 47F
09/11 01:37, 47F
推
09/11 01:38, , 48F
09/11 01:38, 48F
→
09/11 01:38, , 49F
09/11 01:38, 49F
→
09/11 01:40, , 50F
09/11 01:40, 50F
→
09/11 01:40, , 51F
09/11 01:40, 51F
→
09/11 01:40, , 52F
09/11 01:40, 52F
→
09/11 01:41, , 53F
09/11 01:41, 53F
→
09/11 01:41, , 54F
09/11 01:41, 54F
→
09/11 01:42, , 55F
09/11 01:42, 55F
→
09/11 01:42, , 56F
09/11 01:42, 56F
→
09/11 01:43, , 57F
09/11 01:43, 57F
推
09/11 01:44, , 58F
09/11 01:44, 58F
→
09/11 01:44, , 59F
09/11 01:44, 59F
→
09/11 01:44, , 60F
09/11 01:44, 60F
→
09/11 02:11, , 61F
09/11 02:11, 61F
→
09/11 02:11, , 62F
09/11 02:11, 62F
→
09/11 02:15, , 63F
09/11 02:15, 63F
→
09/11 02:41, , 64F
09/11 02:41, 64F
→
09/11 02:59, , 65F
09/11 02:59, 65F
→
09/11 23:53, , 66F
09/11 23:53, 66F