Fw: [新聞] 不列顛大選,蘇格蘭政治板塊地震大變動

看板PublicIssue作者 (薩爾瓦多上士 >>>))時間9年前 (2015/05/08 17:07), 9年前編輯推噓3(305)
留言8則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1LJ7kKgU ] 作者: lorenzero (薩爾瓦多上士 >>>)) 看板: Gossiping 標題: [新聞] 蘇格蘭政治板塊大變動 時間: Fri May 8 17:02:08 2015 蘇格蘭共59選區,民調預測58,實際開票56。反對蘇獨的工黨更是由2010 的41席掉到只剩下1席! 有沒有台灣媒體一直報什麼鬼華裔議員當選啊? 我們是台灣人,中國人的後代關我們屁事?不如關心主張蘇格蘭獨立的蘇格蘭民族黨吧? 補上:蘇格蘭板塊變化圖http://0rz.tw/WtuTo 蘋果報導(內有不列顛國會板塊):http://0rz.tw/AnHy2 LAB=工黨 SNP=蘇格蘭民族黨 補充;香港媒體人陶傑對於"華裔"現象之針砭(只看血統不看政見投票才是被排擠的原因) http://0rz.tw/briWN 1.媒體來源: ※ 華盛頓郵報[m 2.完整新聞標題: ※ British election results produce seismic political shift in Scotland 3.完整新聞內文: ※ LONDON — The 2015 British election will be remembered for much more than which party ran first in the overall voting. It will be known at least as much as the election that produced a seismic political shift in Scotland that changed the face of British politics. Just eight months after - losing a referendum to declare Scotland’s independence from the United Kingdom, the Scottish National Party (SNP) was poised Thursday night to sweep the bulk of the region’s 59 parliamentary seats. A BBC exit poll released shortly after polling places closed projected that the party could end up with all but one of those seats. SNP leader - Nicola Sturgeon reacted cautiously, tweeting: “I’m hoping for a good night but I think 58 seats is unlikely.” In the end, the SNP ended up with 56. The SNP’s surge in the wake of its September defeat has been the biggest surprise of this spring’s election, a development that has rocked the Labor Party in what long has been a traditional stronghold. So powerful was the SNP tide that among those swept away was Douglas Alexander, - Labor’s shadow foreign secretary and campaign chief, who lost his seat to a 20-year-old student. Conceding defeat, Alexander said it is now Labor’s “responsibility to re-win the trust” that had obviously been lost. Later, Jim Murphy, the leader of the Labor Party in Scotland, also lost his seat to the SNP. And an incredible 35-point swing toward the SNP cost Labor the seat long held by former prime minister Gordon Brown, who had decided to retire. Britain’s unpredictable election View Photos Voters will decide if Conservative incumbent David Cameron or Labor challenger Ed Miliband will be prime minister. A confluence of events brought Scotland and the Labor Party to this moment, some reflecting long-standing problems within the party and others triggered by reaction in Scotland to the referendum campaign. Rather than contracting after losing the independence vote, the SNP was revitalized, with a sharply increased membership and an enthusiasm unmatched by the Labor Party. During the independence referendum campaign, Labor made what appears to have been a costly decision to join the Conservatives and others in a cross-party effort to preserve the United Kingdom and defeat the movement to break away. To voters who want a Labor Party devoted to Scotland, the decision looked like a betrayal — a party in league with London that was no longer authentically Scottish. “There was a feeling [in Scotland] of ‘they sold us out,’ ” said Peter Riddell, director of the - London-based - Institute for - Government. The second factor was the - neglect of the Labor Party in Scotland by its national leaders, a - disregard that has long stirred resentment. For years, talented Labor leaders from Scotland headed to London and the national government. The national party was looking to Scotland principally as a source of seats to buoy its strength in Parliament, rather than acting as an advocate for Scotland, analysts here said. Meanwhile, the party in Scotland was atrophying, with membership declining sharply and its local organizations weakened by complacency. By this spring, it was clear that Labor in Scotland was a hollowed-out - party with little muscle to wage an effective campaign. But that hollowing was two decades in the making. “We had a false result in 2010 where people voted for [former prime minister] Gordon Brown because he was a Scot,” said Paul Sinclair, a former Labor adviser. “While the SNP consistently modernized and became a very modern professional outfit, the Labor Party just withered on the vine.” The third factor has been the performance of SNP leader Sturgeon, who emerged as the undisputed star of the campaign this spring as she traveled around Scotland in a helicopter adorned with her photograph. She delivered strong performances in televised debates and forums. She also lacks the hard edges of former leader Alex Salmond, who was either loved or loathed. How Britain's election could turn out(1:13) Britain's 2015 election is one of the tightest in decades and could lead to potential government gridlock. The Post's Adam Taylor explains the possible outcomes, depending on which parties win the most seats in parliament. (Alice Li/The Washington Post) Sturgeon vowed to push Labor Party leader Ed Miliband to the left on issues such as spending on the - National Health Service and the future of the Trident nuclear program. Miliband insisted that he would not make a deal with the SNP, though he never ruled out using its votes to secure power. All that was put into question as the polls closed Thursday night. Now the issue is how the SNP would operate as the third-largest party in Parliament in a government led by the Tories, given sharply different views on Scottish independence and Britain’s membership in the European Union. What the SNP’s strength means for the future of the independence movement is another question. John Curtice, a professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde, observed on his blog Thursday that SNP success in the election does not constitute a significant rise in support for independence among the voters. On that issue, he said, opinions have not changed much since last fall. “If the SNP do well in the election,” he wrote, “it will tell us as much about the workings of the first-past-the-post electoral system as it does about the balance of public opinion on the independence debate.” 4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址): http://4fun.tw/tiQ3 5.備註: ※ 蘇格蘭共59選區,民調預測58,實際開票56。反對蘇獨的工黨更是由2010 的41席掉到只剩下1席!有沒有台灣媒體一直報什麼鬼華裔議員當選啊? 我們是台灣人,中國人的後代關我們屁事?不如關心主張蘇格蘭獨立的蘇格蘭民族黨吧? -- Hydrogen Iodine Phosphorous Hydrogen Oxygen Phosphorous That's called Hip Hop -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.109.55.239 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1431075732.A.A9E.html

05/08 17:02, , 1F
...原來如此 馬終於和小刀分手了
05/08 17:02, 1F

05/08 17:03, , 2F
蘇格蘭民族黨的女黨魁 好像很厲害
05/08 17:03, 2F

05/08 17:03, , 3F
頭香 這個該推
05/08 17:03, 3F

05/08 17:04, , 4F
工黨這敗象真像去年的KMT
05/08 17:04, 4F

05/08 17:04, , 5F
下雨了
05/08 17:04, 5F
※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:05:40 ※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:06:22

05/08 17:06, , 6F
可惜中國不是英國
05/08 17:06, 6F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:07:53

05/08 17:21, , 7F
是香港人,不過人家也說得很明他只注重他選區選民的利
05/08 17:21, 7F

05/08 17:21, , 8F
益,他並不注重香港華裔對他的看法 ( ′-`)y-~
05/08 17:21, 8F

05/08 17:24, , 9F
就是說啊 陶傑也講了要認真看政見而不是盲目相挺
05/08 17:24, 9F

05/08 17:26, , 10F
是說這次有趣的是得票數跟席次的比對表啊,可以附一下
05/08 17:26, 10F

05/08 17:26, , 11F
我都快為 英國獨立黨 哭泣了,一整個悲劇
05/08 17:26, 11F

05/08 17:40, , 12F
英國獨立黨拿了快400萬票 只有1席
05/08 17:40, 12F

05/08 17:41, , 13F
民主統一黨才18萬多票 就已經8席了~
05/08 17:41, 13F
※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:47:04 ※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:52:10 ※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 17:53:13 ※ 編輯: lorenzero (140.109.55.239), 05/08/2015 18:00:06

05/09 08:59, , 14F
好羨慕蘇格蘭
05/09 08:59, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1LJ7pgD3 (PublicIssue)